High expectations
Download
1 / 65

High Expectations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 384 Views
  • Uploaded on

High Expectations. Addressing the needs of high poverty, minority kids. Based on the work of Ruby Payne, the TESA study and program, Lauren Resnick, Carol Dwek and others. The greatest single factor affecting student achievement is the teacher in the classroom. Robert Marzano. Questions?.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'High Expectations' - arleen


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
High expectations

High Expectations

Addressing the needs of high poverty, minority kids.

Based on the work of Ruby Payne, the TESA study and program, Lauren Resnick, Carol Dwek and others


The greatest single factor affecting student achievement is the teacher in the classroom. Robert Marzano


Questions
Questions? the teacher in the classroom. Robert Marzano

Can ALL students achieve at the levels that we want them to?

Can students get “smarter”?


Summary
Summary the teacher in the classroom. Robert Marzano

Many of our students TODAY fit the model of what we only used to see in urban (Inner-city) schools

They can learn . . .

But we must learn first!


The certainties
The Certainties the teacher in the classroom. Robert Marzano

  • You want to reach more of your students.

  • You want all of your students to be successful.

  • You will not let who your students are todaykeep you from helping them become who they can be tomorrow.


The learning goals
The Learning Goals the teacher in the classroom. Robert Marzano

  • I will understand that High Expectations produce Achievement, regardless of the intelligence of the student.

  • I will learn how to address the needs of my students by understanding how to interact with them.


Teacher Expectations Student Achievement the teacher in the classroom. Robert Marzano

The Self-fulfilling Prophecy

Expectations

Reinforcement

1

3

Fulfillment

New

Behavior

2

Robert K. Merton, 1948


A Self-fulfilling prophecy is said to occur when one’s belief concerning the occurrence of some future event … makes one behave in a manner …that increases the likelihood that the expected event will occur…. Eden, 1990


It is expectancy in the sense of that which what the expecter, or “prophet,”believes is likely to occur, rather than that which a person believes ought to occur, that leads to the behavior that fulfills the prophecy.


Your students need expecter, or YOU to become the prophet of their success!


The expecter, or reality of our existence is based upon our ideas about ourselves, our circumstances, and our prospects for the future. Other people play an important role in the development of our internal and external reality.


Discuss with a partner
Discuss with a partner. . . expecter, or

  • What role does student’s belief about her ability to achieve affect her ability to achieve?



Parent Expectations expecter, or

Teacher Expectations

Performance

Self Expectations

Coach Expectations


Rosenthal [1973] suggests four mediating factors in this inter personal expectancy:• socioemotional climate• feedback• input• output


Socioemotional inter personal expectancy: climate: is defined as behaviors that are nonverbal and mostly subconscious, that convey positive or negative feelings.

Are we “telling” our students that they are successes or failures without telling them anything?


Feedback is an indispensable ingredient to any learning process
Feedback inter personal expectancy: is an indispensable ingredient to any learning process.

People give more feedback and more varied feedback to people of whom they expect more.


Input in the form of teaching more challenging material is provided to those expected to do well
Input inter personal expectancy:, in the form of teaching more challenging material, is provided to those expected to do well.

We should not let our compassion for students interfere with our mission to educated them. Communicating high expectations is our most important task with our low performing students.


Output is defined as producing a learning result as in answering a question in class
Output inter personal expectancy: is defined as producing a learning result as in answering a question in class.

Teachers give pupils opportunities for producing output by assigning them challenging projects or by calling upon them to do something extra, beyond the minimal requirements.


Teacher expectations student achievement
Teacher expectations inter personal expectancy:Student achievement


Reflection
Reflection inter personal expectancy:

Discuss with a partner. . . .

What effect do teacher expectations have on student achievement?


Principles of teaching and learning
Principles of Teaching and Learning inter personal expectancy:

  • Effort produces achievement

  • Learning is about making connections

  • We learn with and through others

  • Learning takes time

  • Motivation matters


Aptitude v effort
Aptitude v. Effort inter personal expectancy:

  • Lauren Resnick and Megan Hall studying the research of social psychologist and cognitive scientist found that effort is “just as, or more important than aptitude.”

  • In addition they found that effort can improve intelligence!

  • Intelligence is “learnable”!


So how can you do that
So how can you do that? inter personal expectancy:

Please state the following out loud:

So how can you do that?


Building a growth mindset
Building a “Growth Mindset” inter personal expectancy:

  • Dr. Carol Dweck, “Mindset”, 2006

  • Fixed Mindset v. Growth Mindset

  • Fixed Mindset - Belief that you have innate intelligence that does not change

  • Growth Mindset – Belief that with effort you can “grow” and get “smarter”


Fixed mindset
Fixed Mindset inter personal expectancy:

  • This has been the standard belief of many educators for over 100 years.

  • Partially (and improperly) attributed to Alfred Binet.

  • “A few modern philosophers. . .assert that an individual’s intelligence is a fixed quantity, a quantity which can not be increased. We protest and react against this pessimism…”


Fixed mindset smart attributes
Fixed Mindset – “Smart” Attributes inter personal expectancy:

  • Children believe they are smart and will not attempt work that is challenging for them.

  • Children do not handle failure well because they have been told that they are smart.


Fixed mindset dumb attributes
Fixed Mindset – “Dumb” Attributes inter personal expectancy:

  • Children believe they are not smart AND do not believe that they can achieve so effort is low.

  • They see no point in challenging themselves because they are “dumb” and always will be.

  • Children do not handle failure well because they see it as proof of their low ability.


Fixed mindset how do i get it
Fixed Mindset – How do I get it? inter personal expectancy:

So who tells them they are “smart” or “dumb”?

  • Parents

  • Teachers

  • Schools

  • Assessment


Growth mindset
Growth Mindset inter personal expectancy:

  • The growth mindset happens when students believe that effort and hard work will get them where they want to go academically and non-academically.

  • It affects, achievement, self-esteem, relationships, etc.


Growth mindset1
Growth Mindset inter personal expectancy:

  • When students have a growth mindset they look at failure as a challenge to improve.

  • Students (people) with a growth mindset believe that their intelligence is tied to their ability to improve who they are, both personally and academically.


High poverty minority kids
High poverty, minority kids inter personal expectancy:

  • Which category do they fit in and why?

  • Fixed Mindset (Smart)

  • Fixed Mindset (Dumb)

  • Growth Mindset

    Discuss with a partner where your students are.

Where do we want them to be?


How do we promote the building of the growth mindset
How do we Promote the Building of the Growth Mindset? inter personal expectancy:

Stakeholders in the student’s life need to promote it and build it?

  • Parents

  • Teachers

  • Schools

  • Assessment


How do we promote the building of the growth mindset1
How do we Promote the Building of the Growth Mindset? inter personal expectancy:

  • Teachers need to believe and act upon the understanding that EFFORT produces ACHIEVMENT.

  • Teachers need to believe and act upon the understanding that EFFORT can improve INTELLIGENCE.

  • Teachers need to believe and act upon the understanding that HIGH EXPECTATIONS can GREATLY increase EFFORT in students.


How do we promote the building of the growth mindset2
How do we Promote the Building of the Growth Mindset? inter personal expectancy:

  • When students BELIEVE that they can ACHIEVE then the self fulfilling prophecy becomes reality.

  • Teachers need to modify their behavior so that all students believe that they can achieve at higher levels through hard work.


Processing
Processing. . . inter personal expectancy:

  • Based on your role in your school district what actions do you need to take to help support the building of a growth mindset in ALL of your students?

  • Once we set the –POSSITIVE self fulfilling prophecy in motion we need to build the Growth Mindset to to allow the student to internalize and perpetuate the belief.


Teacher behaviors that affect student behaviors

Teacher Behaviors that Affect Student Behaviors inter personal expectancy:

Teacher Expectations

=

Student Achievement


1 equitable distribution beating the t
1. Equitable Distribution: inter personal expectancy:Beating the “T”

  • Teachers tend to call more often on students who sit in the front row and middle seats in the classroom (the T) and ignore students outside the T seating pattern.

  • Students in the back corners have the least likelihood of being asked to answer a question.

  • Moreover, by the middle grades, many students learn the strategy of distribution and sit themselves, given the choice, according to their desire to participate or not participate.

  • High performers go to the T, low performers to the corners.


1 equitable distribution beating the t1
1. Equitable Distribution: Beating the “T” inter personal expectancy:

  • How to “Beat” the “T”

  • Teachers need to make a conscious effort to direct their questions to the corners and the back of the room.

  • When put into effect, the strategy puts students on notice of the expectation that all students, regardless of seating, would have an equal chance to be called on.


1 equitable distribution beating the t2
1. Equitable Distribution: Beating the “T” inter personal expectancy:

  • Other implications-

  • What other ways do students who do not wish to participate at high levels behave in a classroom?


2 feedback and guidance
2. Feedback and Guidance inter personal expectancy:

  • Teachers give less accurate and less detailed feedback to students they perceive as low achievers. Good (1970, Rowe 2004)

  • Teachers give students perceived as high achievers more detailed and more accurate feedback.


2 feedback and guidance1
2. Feedback and Guidance inter personal expectancy:

Who needs the detailed feedback more…

Low achievers or high achievers?


Feedback and guidance
Feedback and Guidance inter personal expectancy:

  • Anglo students are more likely to get accurate and detailed feedback than African-American or Hispanic students. Rubovits and Maehr (1973), David (2006)

  • 22 classrooms of mixed race students confirmed that this is still an issue

  • Very teacher dependent


Feedback and guidance1
Feedback and Guidance inter personal expectancy:

Teachers should make accurate comments about eachstudent's response. The feedback should note that an answer was correct or incorrect and, in the best circumstances, would explain "why.“

Good feedback/questioning would ask the student to explain why?


3 proximity
3. Proximity inter personal expectancy:

  • A teacher's physical closeness to a student affects time on task. (Payne, Brophy)

  • Many of our “best” teachers use proximity to address discipline problems, yet not academic problems.


3 proximity1
3. Proximity inter personal expectancy:

Teachers need to think about how to reseat students, how to rearrange seating for easier access, and how to move closer to students who are off task.


4 individual help
4. Individual Help inter personal expectancy:

  • Sadker and Sadker (1985) noticed how the assertiveness of high-achieving students, especially males, resulted from more individual help from the teacher.

  • David (2006) confirmed this in his district

  • Note: Students who act out/call out in class also get more attention


4 individual help1
4. Individual Help inter personal expectancy:

Teachers should identify the two or three students who received the least amount of attention, even when they called for help in a proper manner, and then make a conscious effort to assist these students in a non-threatening way.


5 praise
5. Praise inter personal expectancy:

  • Teachers are less likely to praise perceived low achievers for academic performance and more likely to praise perceived high achievers. Rosenshine (1971) and Good (1987)

  • Moreover, researchers noted that teachers tended to protect low achievers from criticism about wrong answers.


5 praise1
5. Praise inter personal expectancy:

Teachers should give energetic, positive feedback and rewards to all students, with a special concentration of attention for the perceived low performers.


5 praise2
5. Praise inter personal expectancy:

IMPORTANT: The praise should directed toward the growth of learning and not the level or measure of learning.

Students need to know that it is their effort and growth that counts and not whether or not they make “A’s”.

“Straight A” students are not being challenged enough”. (Wise)


6 effective questioning
6. Effective Questioning inter personal expectancy:

  • Question Sequencing

  • Scaffolding of questions

  • Wait Time

  • All students MUST answer ALL questions asked of them


6 effective questioning higher level questions
6. Effective Questioning -Higher-Level Questions inter personal expectancy:

  • Teachers asked a predominance of lower level questions to low performing students. There was little or no scaffolding in a class period or throughout the year. (TESA)

  • Proper questioning strategies and scaffolding of questions is essential.


6 effective questioning higher level questions1
6. Effective Questioning- Higher-Level Questions inter personal expectancy:

Teachers should be familiar with Bloom’s question levels and stem choices and use them with scaffolding to challenge students to think at higher levels. In this way, teachers would communicate that all students were expected to perform complex thinking tasks.


7 courtesy
7. Courtesy inter personal expectancy:

  • Some research has shown that many teachers were discourteous and disrespectful toward "low-status students" yet demanded that those students show respect to them as teachers. (A number of researchers, including Brophy, Good, Hillar, Sadker and Sadker, and Rist)

  • Even some minority teachers showed less respect and had lower expectations of low income students.


7 courtesy1
7. Courtesy inter personal expectancy:

  • More often than not, high-status students, those who received the most attention from the teacher, copied the teacher's behavior toward the low-status students.

  • This included interrupting answers of the low-status students, greater use of put-downs, and sarcasm.

  • The high-status group members were mostly white males; minority females were the lowest status group.


7 courtesy2
7. Courtesy inter personal expectancy:

Teachers should be conscious of how they respond to high and low-status groups by the way they give attention to these students.

Teachers should respond to students with courteous statements such as "thank you" and "please," and avoid the use of sarcastic tones and belittling phrases.


8 personal regard
8. Personal Regard inter personal expectancy:

  • Teachers pay less attention in academic and social situations to the socioeconomically disadvantaged students. Brophy (1986)

  • The more advantaged students received more smiles, more eye contact, more questions that asked them to connect academic content to personal experiences, and more positive responses to personal examples.

  • Outside of class (as in the lunchroom or on the playground), teachers gave less time and attention to the personal well-being and interest of disadvantaged students.


8 personal regard and relevance
8. Personal Regard and Relevance inter personal expectancy:

  • Teachers should develop content-related questions that are connected to what they know might be of interest to a student.

  • For instance, a social studies teacher might ask Juan to compare the means of transportation used in his native Guatemala to the means used in Dallas.

  • The teacher should not limit these interest-connected questions to select students.

  • The teacher's challenge with these questions and other displays of personal regard is to promote equitable distribution.


9 delving
9. Delving inter personal expectancy:

  • Low achievers were asked fewer and easier questions than high achievers. Brophy (1986)

  • If the low achiever showed signs of bewilderment, the teacher more readily turned to another student or answered the question.

  • When high achievers were questioned, the teacher more readily gave clues, probed for evidence or reasons, or encouraged a more extensive response.


9 delving1
9. Delving inter personal expectancy:

Teachers should push all students to expand on their answers, to ask all students a second or third follow-up question that forces them to delve more deeply into course content, and to provide clues that would help all students, especially the lowest performers, to give a full response.


10 listening
10. Listening inter personal expectancy:

  • Teachers spent more time talking TO low-status students and less to the high achievers. (Flanders)

  • In contrast, perceived high achievers spent more time sharing ideas, conversing with the teacher, and engaging in activities that required student interaction.


10 listening1
10. Listening inter personal expectancy:

Allow for and structure time for low achievers to discuss content and delve deeper.


If we believe, inter personal expectancy:

they will achieve!


Teacher expectations student achievement tesa
Teacher Expectations Student Achievement (TESA) inter personal expectancy:

For more information please contact:

John L. David

Social Studies Consultant

Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD

[email protected]


ad