Framework for empowering pathology in the electronic health record
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 23

Framework for Empowering Pathology in the Electronic Health Record PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 68 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Framework for Empowering Pathology in the Electronic Health Record. Walter H. Henricks, MD, FCAP, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Jodi G. Daniel, JD, MPH, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Walter H. Henricks, MD, FCAP

Download Presentation

Framework for Empowering Pathology in the Electronic Health Record

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Framework for empowering pathology in the electronic health record

Framework for Empowering Pathology in the Electronic Health Record


Framework for empowering pathology in the electronic health record

  • Walter H. Henricks, MD, FCAP, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

  • Jodi G. Daniel, JD, MPH, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology


Walter h henricks md fcap framework for empowering pathology in the ehr may 8 2012

Walter H. Henricks, MD, FCAP

Framework for Empowering Pathology in the EHR

May 8, 2012


Objectives

Objectives

  • Review HIT Regulatory Framework

  • Discuss Two Regulatory Challenges & Policy Solutions

  • Note What CAP Can Do & What You Can Do


Regulatory framework arra

Regulatory Framework: ARRA


Pathology s two challenges

Pathology’s Two Challenges


Challenge 1

Challenge #1

  • Suboptimal management of laboratory information in EHRs

  • CPOE design and configurationissues

  • Potential patient safety issues

  • Hidden costs


Suboptimal lab data handling in ehr

This EHR report is garbled, I need to call the lab

Suboptimal Lab Data Handling in EHR

We don’t control the EHR, you’ll have to call IT


Example garbled pap report in ehr

Example: Garbled PAP report in EHR

  • Example of unpublicized “nonstandard” view of Pap smear result in EHR – garbled text

  • Not widely used; was not known to lab at time of interface validation


Lab data problem symptoms

Lab Data Problem Symptoms

  • Reference ranges, comments, footnotes

  • Abnormal result flags, preliminary reporting and updates

  • Improper handling of:

    • Corrected results

    • Unsolicited results

    • Reflex tests

    • Performing lab name & address


Poor cpoe symptoms

Poor CPOE Symptoms

  • Incorrect, incomplete, inappropriate test orders

  • Inefficient lab/provider operations

  • Billing & compliance problems

  • Pitfalls – future orders, duplicate handling, canceled orders


Policy initiatives cap

Policy Initiatives – CAP…

  • Has submitted extensive comments on ONC Stage 2 (2014) Standards & Certification Proposed rule

    • Need for FULL testing of pending laboratory reporting guide before implementation

    • Need for laboratory data/vocabulary integrity as it moves throughout healthcare system

  • Is working for pathologist role as laboratory data stewards in EHR environment

    • Developing white paper

  • Desires to partner with ONC and others on solutions

    • e.g. domain expertise for standards and/or certification criteria


Challenge 2

Challenge #2

  • Pathologists are “non-hospital based” (per CMS definition) eligible providers (EPs) for MU incentives and penalties

  • Challenged by MU requirements to:

    • Use certified EHRs

    • Report specified objectives

    • Report clinical quality measures (CQMs)


Incentive penalty rule challenges

Incentive/Penalty Rule Challenges

  • Certified EHRs: Pathologists do not practice in EHRs

  • Report certain objectives: Objectives not applicable to pathology practice (written for office-based providers)

  • CQMs: Not applicable to pathology practice


Regulatory relief possible

Regulatory Relief Possible

  • CMS considering criteria for relief from penalties for eligible providers that:

    • Lack face-to-face/telemedicine interaction with patients

    • Lack follow-up with patients

    • Lack control over availability of certified EHRs at their practices


Legislative solution on the table

Legislative Solution on the Table

  • H.R. 4066, “The Health Information Technology Reform Act” introduced by Rep. Tom Price MD (R-GA-6)

    • Removes pathologists from eligibility for MU incentives or payment adjustments

    • Penalty relief would be permanent


What cap is doing

What CAP is Doing

  • Advocating for regulatory relief

  • Seeking passage of H.R. 4066

  • Developing white paper on best practices for lab data/transmission


Partner with stakeholders

Partner with Stakeholders


What you can do at home

What You Can Do at Home

  • Advocate for patients’ laboratory information in EHR

  • Develop some expertise:

    • Intradepartmental

    • Institutional

  • Raise awareness and provide domain expertise at institutional level


What you can do here

What You Can Do Here

  • When you visit your Senators/Congressmen….

  • Ask them to support H.R. 4066!


Summary

Summary

  • ARRA hastening EHR adoption

  • CAP working to advance HIT and protect pathologists

  • You have a role in DC and at home

  • Constructive dialogue with policymakers & other stakeholders to continue


  • Login