1 / 33

Blueprint for Tomorrow

Blueprint for Tomorrow. Fairhope City Council February 9, 2008. Eastern Shore Public Transit Study. Gresham Smith & Partners McDonald Transit Associates 2008. Purpose of the Study.

sibyl
Download Presentation

Blueprint for Tomorrow

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Blueprint for Tomorrow Fairhope City Council February 9, 2008

  2. Eastern ShorePublic Transit Study Gresham Smith & Partners McDonald Transit Associates 2008

  3. Purpose of the Study • Identify transportation needs for residents, employers, and visitors in the cities of Daphne, Fairhope, and Spanish Fort • Develop financially feasible recommendations to meet those needs

  4. Background • County population projected to increase by 29% • In the three cities: • 35% increase in population over 10 years • 35% increase in traffic congestion over 10 years • Traffic and population growing at 3% each year

  5. Projected County Population

  6. Population Growth

  7. EmploymentConcentrations

  8. AutoOwnership % of Households with <1 available automobile

  9. Commute Patterns

  10. Public Meetings • 65 attendees at 3 meetings • Generally supportive of public transit • Need good marketing efforts • Need to change people’s mindsets to get them to ride • Service would need to be all day, not just 8 to 5 • Must engage employers

  11. Service Options • Based on analysis and input develop list of possible services • Take an evolving approach • Be specific enough now to engage public in next round of meetings • Present in unbiased way

  12. ROUTE 1 • Highway 98 Spanish Fort to Fairhope • 30 minute frequency • 6:00 am to 8:00 pm • Monday through Saturday • Timed transfers at Thomas Hospital

  13. ROUTE 3 • Fairhope East West Resort • Marriot Grand - downtown Fairhope – Thomas Hospital • Sixty minute frequency • 6:00 am to 8:00 pm • Monday through Saturday • Positive connection at hospital – Route 1 and 4

  14. ROUTE 4 • Fairhope – North South Local • Sixty minute frequency • 6:00 am to 8:00 pm • Monday through Saturday • Positive connection at hospital – Route 1 and 4

  15. OPTION A • Enhance BRATS • Increase number of vehicles serving area • Add more trips to Baylinc • Maintain demand response and subscription basis of service

  16. OPTION B • Enhance BRATS • Add carpool and vanpool program • Work through SARPC • Carpool matching first • Vanpools as demand warrants • Work closely with employers

  17. OPTION C • Enhance BRATS • Add carpool and vanpool program • Add bus routes • Six days a week to start • At least 12 hours per day • Full size bus on Route 1 • Small buses on all other routes

  18. BRATS • Demand-response based system • Provides fixed route service from specific sites with timed transfers to other parts of county • Monday through Friday 6 a.m.-6 p.m. • Special contract service on weekends • Efficient mode for large employer transportation (drop off at one location)

  19. Public Meetings • Need connectivity; emphasis on sidewalks and bicycle access • Roads need to be safer for pedestrians and bicyclists • Discussion about various funding ideas • Need service for commuters to Mobile, Pensacola • Need ferry service across bay • Must be reasonably priced

  20. Stakeholder Interviews • Few of the transportation needs are being met today • Service not available all day or in evenings • There is a need for transit service because of: • Aging population • Cost of fuel • Congestion • Tourism

  21. Stakeholder Interviews • Most do not see enough support for a local tax to fund transit service • Need for public transit services will increase

  22. Next Steps – for BFT - Add carpool and vanpool program • Work through SARPC • Carpool matching first • Emergi-ride program for commuters • Pull major employers together – match large areas of needs • Vanpools through BRATS as demand warrants • Communication of benefits of utilizing mass transit

  23. EASTERN SHORETECHNOLOGY ANDResearchPARK Fall, 2008 Presented by: Vern George George Henry George Partners Charles Dilks DilksConsulting

  24. PURPOSE OF THE EFFORT • PREPARE A STRATEGY TO ACHIEVE A STRONG TECHNOLOGY SECTOR IN THE EASTERN SHORE ECONOMY 27

  25. FOCUS OF THE CONSULTANT WORK • CAN WE DO IT? Yes, we can • Is the resource base sufficient? • WHAT CAN IT BE? • Achievable job and related growth • HOW DO WE DO IT • Strategies and actions required 28

  26. HOW DOWE DO IT? • Marketing to Existing Technology Companies • Creating a Joint College University Center • Developing a Technology and Research Park • Enhancing Entrepreneurial Services with state of the art Incubator • Efficient Organization for Implementing the Strategy 29

  27. WHAT WILL IT CREATE? • Impressive Total Ten Year Tech Growth of 1,100 to 2,300 Jobs • Increased Governmental and Private Business Revenues 30

  28. WHAT IS NEXT for BFT timeline? • Combined forces with BCEDA’s Energy Innovation effort. • Hire a professional to organize and begin efforts • Formulate Governance Structure 31

  29. Technology Innovation Center IMPLEMENTING A PRIVATE/PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP TO REDUCE DEPENDANCE ON PETROLEUM

  30. G-H-G Recommended Strategies • Market to existing technology companies • Create a joint college/university center • Develop technology/business parks • Enhance entrepreneurial services • Create a special purpose entity • Identify startup funding • Hire a permanent Executive Director

More Related