1 / 19

Group A. CME acceleration / deceleration

iSWWS-2013@NCU, Taiwan. Group A. CME acceleration / deceleration. Tomoya Iju (Nagoya University, Japan) Nai Hwa Chen (National Central University, Taiwan). Group Presentation. 1. Our Work. Understanding the rapid acceleration and subsequent deceleration of CME.

shyla
Download Presentation

Group A. CME acceleration / deceleration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. iSWWS-2013@NCU, Taiwan Group A. CME acceleration /deceleration Tomoya Iju (Nagoya University, Japan) Nai Hwa Chen (National Central University, Taiwan) Group Presentation

  2. 1. Our Work • Understanding the rapid acceleration and subsequent deceleration of CME. • We attempt to draw a complete height-time and distance-velocity profiles of CME from the lower solar corona to the Earth. • In this work, we use data of Wind/WAVES radio experiment, SOHO/LASCO coronagraph, interplanetary scintillation (IPS), STEREO/HI heliospheric camera, and in-situ measurements. • We search the CME event detected by all of the above methods, and then find an event.

  3. Feb. 15, 2011 CME (X2.2 flare in AR 11158) SOHO/LASCO C2 and SDO/AIA

  4. Interplanetary Part of Feb. 15, 2011 CME 02/15, 03:54 02/15, 15:29 02/16, 20:09 STEREO-A/COR2, HI-1, and HI-2

  5. Feb. 15, 2011 CME associated type-II and type-III radio burst X2.2 flare occur at 01:55 Wind/WAVES Type-II burst

  6. IPS observation allow us to probe into the inner heliosphere with a cadence of 24 hours. 2.CME Observation using Interplanetary Scintillation (IPS) ↑Solar Wind Imaging Facility (SWIFT) in Toyokawa city ↑ KISO Radio Telescope

  7. 3. Solar Wind Disturbance Factor ‘g-value’ • For each radio source, the g-value is defined as the ratio of observed index ‘m’ to mean value ’my’: quiet:g~1 disturbed:g>1

  8. The approximation that a large fraction of scintillation is given by the radio wave scattering at the P-point on a line-of-sight (Hewish, Scott, and Wills, 1964). A sky-map of enhanced g-values, ‘g-map’, provides information on the spatial distribution of CME between 0.2 and 1 AU.

  9. 4. Identification of ICME Detected by LASCO, IPS, and in-situ Observations • We assumed that • (1) An CME caused a disturbance event day • (2) An CME lie in a region of enhanced g-values in the g-map • The criterion for observation date SOHO/LASCO → IPS → In-situ observation (ACE, etc) ( DED ) In-situ CME detection

  10. Reference distances R1,2and velocities V1,2 5. Calculation of CME Velocity in IPS SOHO-IPS: Here, tSOHOis CME appearance time, dSOHO is Minimum radius of LASCOC2 F.O.V, P-point distance dIPSand observation time tIPS for a g≧1.5 radio source, tACE is CME detection time at ACE, and dACE~1AU IPS-ACE:

  11. 6. Estimation of CME Velocity from Type-II Radio Burst • 5 fold Saito model (1970, 1977). • Using this relation, we can estimate the associated height and velocity from the radio frequency measurements.

  12. 7. Estimation of CME Velocity from in-situ Observations • We identify the near-Earth part of Feb. 15, 2011 CME ourselves using data of solar wind charge states obtained by the ACE/SWICS, and criteria of near-Earth CME identification, i.e., the abruptly increase of charge states for Fe and of O7/O6 ratio during the passing of a CME (Richardson and Cane, 2010). • We define that the velocity of near-Earth CME is the average flow speed during the charge stateenhancement.

  13. 8-1. Result: Height-Time Profile

  14. 8-2. Result: Distance-Velocity Profile

  15. Distance-Velocity Profile of Feb. 15, 2011 CME

  16. 9. Question • We can fit not only data points for the LASCO, IPS, and in-situ observations but also those for the type-II radio burst by a straight line in a logarithmic height-time plot. • Why different slopes of lines for the type-II radio burst and the other observations? • Whether kilometric type-II burst reflects dynamics of CME or not? • We confirm that the CME velocity derived from the IPS, HI-1 and 2 shows the similar value in the range of ~400km/s to ~600km/s.

  17. 10. Discussion • the CME velocity derived from the IPS, HI-1 and 2 indicates that the Feb. 15, 2011 CME rapidly decelerate by the interaction with the solar wind. • The starting timing of type II radio burst is 9 minutes before the CMEs front shown in LASCO C2. the X class flare occurs at 01:55. • We speculate that the shock front of CME generating the type II burst is in LASCO C2 FOV before appearance of CME’s leading edge. • We need further study for the relationship between CME and type-II burst.

  18. Top right: Fast CME (V-Vbg) > 500 km/s Bottom right: Moderate CME 0 km/s ≦ (V-Vbg) ≦500 km/s Bottom left: Slow CME 0 km/s < (V-Vbg)

  19. Conclusion • We draw a height-time and distance-velocity profiles of Feb. 15, 2011 CME from the solar corona to the Earth. • The distance-velocity profile derived from the type-II radio burst shows the rapid acceleration, and the CME velocity derived from the IPS, HI-1 and 2 exhibits the similar value in the range of ~400km/s to ~600km/s. This indicate rapid decelerate of CME by the interaction with the solar wind.

More Related