1 / 14

Teaching intercultural competence - the complementarity of training and education

Teaching intercultural competence - the complementarity of training and education. Michael Byram University of Durham m.s.byram@dur.ac.uk. About purpose and means. Concepts and language Whorfian/Humboldtian hypotheses – weak form. Education and training.

shiela
Download Presentation

Teaching intercultural competence - the complementarity of training and education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Teaching intercultural competence - the complementarity of training and education Michael Byram University of Durham m.s.byram@dur.ac.uk

  2. About purpose and means • Concepts and language • Whorfian/Humboldtian hypotheses – weak form

  3. Education and training • “Education = ‘values’” versus “training = ‘behaviour’” • Becoming interculturally competent through education and training (Feng, Byram and Fleming eds. – Multilingual Matters) • Introduction – Fleming

  4. Competence • Competence in training • Repetition and reflection • Competence in education • Reflection and criticality e.g. ‘critical cultural awareness’/’savoir s’engager’

  5. Fleming diagram Surface ………………………………… Training Depth …………………………………… Education

  6. Intercultural competence • Greeting and leave-taking – surface • Compare pronunciation and identity • Symbolic competence (Kramsch) – depth • -- Not which words, but whose words are those? Whose discourse? Whose interests are being served by this text? • -- What made these words possible, and others impossible? • -- How does the speaker position him/herself? • -- How does he/she frame the events talked about? • -- What prior discourses does he/she draw on?

  7. Symbolic competence for post-modern society - California Seen from California in 2010, culture today is associated with ideologies, attitudes and beliefs, created and manipulated by the discourse of the media, the Internet, the marketing industry, Hollywood and other mind-shaping interest groups. It is seen less as a world of institutions and historical traditions, or even as identifiable communities of practice, than as a mental toolkit of subjective metaphors, affectivities, historical memories, contextualisations and transcontextualisation of experience, with which we make meaning of the world around us and share that meaning with others.

  8. Transcultural and intercultural (Bredella) • Transcultural – ‘is’ and ‘ought’ • No identification with national etc groups • Intercultural • Reinforces boundaries – racist • BUT – transcultural does not exist and is not feasible • Intercultural includes ability to understand otherness in its variations within (national and other) groups

  9. Internationalism and cosmopolitanism (Holbaard) Internationalism may be described as the ideology of international bonding. However, the bonds that link states, nations and groups of individuals and make up the multidimensional international society of the modern world are of several kinds and join together broad variety of parties.

  10. Internationalism, it follows, is distinct from cosmopolitanism, which does not in its essence pertain to international society. Proclaiming a worldwide society of individuals that overrides states, nations and groups of people, it tends to disregard all kinds of international relations and to consider the society of human beings en masse.

  11. Internationalism/interculturality and cosmopolitanism/transculturality • Cosmopolitanism as ideal • Internationalism as feasible

  12. Characteristics of internationalism in education • opportunities for students to create and cooperate in groups of several nationalities, forming ‘bonded’ international groups • teaching and learning which include critical thinking as intended outcome • teaching and learning which leads to learners becoming aware of the presuppositions they hold and the national basis of many of these • a change of allegiance among students towards the idealism of a cosmopolitan society and a fair and democratic world.

  13. Foreign language teaching and internationalism • Intercultural competence as a basis for successful cooperation and ‘bonding’ • Project work e.g. internet • Temporary ‘bonding’ and reflection on own identifications

  14. Summary • Complementarity of education and training – includes all kinds of competences • Intercultural competence includes both surface and depth competences • Interculturality and internationalism (feasible) AND transculturality and cosmopolitanism (ideal) • FLT contributes intercultural competence to international bonding/cooperation

More Related