1 / 22

Chapter 7: Gathering Evidence for Practice

Chapter 7: Gathering Evidence for Practice. Chapter Highlights. Epidemiologic research defined Descriptive versus analytical research Strengths and limitations of epidemiologic research methodology Applying epidemiologic research to practice. Question.

shayj
Download Presentation

Chapter 7: Gathering Evidence for Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 7: Gathering Evidence for Practice

  2. Chapter Highlights • Epidemiologic research defined • Descriptive versus analytical research • Strengths and limitations of epidemiologic research methodology • Applying epidemiologic research to practice

  3. Question Is the following statement True or False? In descriptive studies, the researcher relies on comparisons between groups to determine the role of various risk factors in causing the problem.

  4. Answer False Rationale: In analytical studies, the researcher relies on comparisons between groups to determine the role of various risk factors in causing the problem. In descriptive studies, the researcher collects information to characterize and summarize the health event or problem.

  5. Epidemiologic Research • Identify community/public health problems • Describe natural history and etiology of diseases

  6. Observational Studies • In descriptive studies, the researcher collects information to characterize and summarize the health event or problem. • In analytical studies, the researcher relies on comparisons between groups to determine the role of various risk factors in causing the problem.

  7. Question Is the following statement True or False? Cohort studies involve an in-depth analysis of an individual, group, or social institution.

  8. Answer False Rationale: Case studies involve an in-depth analysis of an individual, group, or social institution. Cohort studies, sometimes referred to as prospective studies,are longitudinal studies, which monitor subjects over time to find associations between risk factors and health outcomes.

  9. Types of Descriptive Studies • Case studies involve an in-depth analysis of an individual, group, or social institution • Cross sectional studies are those in which a sample of persons from a population is enrolled and their exposures and health outcomes are measured simultaneously.

  10. Question Is the following statement True or False? Case–control studies, also known as prospective studies, work backward from the effect to the suspected cause.

  11. Answer False Rationale: Case–control studies, also known as retrospective studies, work backward from the effect to the suspected cause. Cohort studies, sometimes referred to as prospective studies, are longitudinal studies, monitor subjects over time to find associations between risk factors and health outcomes.

  12. Types of Analytical Studies • Cohort studies, sometimes referred to as prospective studies, are longitudinal studies, which monitor subjects over time to find associations between risk factors and health outcomes. RR = Incidence rate of people exposed Incidence rate of people not exposed Causality—relationship between two variables in which the presence or absence of one variable (the “cause”) determines the presence or absence of the other (the “effect”)

  13. Types of Analytical Studies (cont.) • Case–control studies, also known as retrospective studies, work backward from the effect to the suspected cause. • Subjects are selected on the basis of the presence or absence of the disease or outcome in question—one group of people (case-subjects) with the health problem and another group without the health problem (controls) • The relationship between exposure and outcome in a case-control study is quantified by calculating the odds ratio (OR). The OR is an estimate of RR that is interpreted in the same manner as RR.

  14. Advantages of Case–Control Studies • Allow for the examination of multiple exposures for a single outcome • Are suitable for studying rare diseases and those with long latency periods • Require fewer case-subjects • Are generally quicker and less expensive to conduct than cohort studies, making them well suited for an outbreak investigation

  15. Disadvantages of Case–Control Studies • They are not appropriate for studying rare exposures. • They are subject to bias because of the method used to select controls. • They do not allow the direct measure of the incidence of disease.

  16. Question Is the following statement True or False? Intervention study is the epidemiologic investigation designed to test a hypothesized relationship by modifying an identified factor in a population. The study is preventive.

  17. Answer False Rationale:Intervention study is the epidemiologic investigation designed to test a hypothesized relationship by modifying an identified factor in a population. Studies may be therapeutic (clinical) or preventive.

  18. Intervention (Experimental) Studies • Intervention study—epidemiologic investigation designed to test a hypothesized relationship by modifying an identified factor in a population. • Preventive trial—study where the investigator provides a specific preventive measure to the group under study and follows the group to determine the effects of the intervention • Therapeutic trial—clinical trial where the investigator provides a specific treatment (therapy) to the group under study and follows the group to determine the effects of the treatment

  19. Statistics • P value, generally at .05, to ensure that the study results are not due to chance alone and to avoid committing a type I error. • A type I error occurs when the null hypothesis (H0, a theory that has been put forward, either because it is believed to be true or because it is to be used as a basis for argument) is rejected when it is true. • A type II error occurs when one rejects the alternative hypothesis (Ha) (fails to reject the null hypothesis) when the alternative hypothesis is true.

  20. Question Is the following statement True or False? The “gold standard” for research design is the randomized, experimental group design.

  21. Answer False Rationale: The “gold standard” for research design is the randomized, control group design.

  22. Community Health Nurses • Consumers of health-related research, which is used to inform and educate the public • Having a basic understanding of research methods allows nurses to interpret and critically analyze studies described in newspapers, magazines, and scientific journals, as well as on the Internet • Allows nurses to generate research questions related to problems identified in their practice

More Related