1 / 44

Economic Complexity and Economic Development

Economic Complexity and Economic Development. Cesar A. Hidalgo Center for International Development, and Harvard Kennedy School Harvard University. Hidalgo CA, Hausmann R, PNAS 2009 Hidalgo CA et al., Science, 2007. Essentialist. Population Thinker. Variation. Unique. Variation.

Download Presentation

Economic Complexity and Economic Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Economic Complexity and Economic Development Cesar A. Hidalgo Center for International Development, and Harvard Kennedy School Harvard University Hidalgo CA, Hausmann R, PNAS 2009 Hidalgo CA et al., Science, 2007

  2. Essentialist Population Thinker Variation Unique Variation Unique Essence Abstraction Variation Unique Charles Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace Jean-Baptiste Lamarck and Carl Linnaeus

  3. To make a product you need more than Capital and Labor Public Inputs Tradable Inputs Certifying Body Roads Trade Agreements Leather Technical Education Tanner Ports Power Labor Skills Leather Cutters Tax Regulation Norms Leather Pressers trust Sawing teamwork Sole Making Manufacturing & Management Certifications Shapers Private Inputs

  4. Capabilities and Products

  5. COUNTRIESand capabilities

  6. Countries Capabilities Products

  7. Countries Products

  8. Here I will show that within this view it is possible to: -Understand and measurethe complexity of countries economies (understood as the relative number of economic activities that exist within it). -Demonstrate that economic complexity is a fundamental determinant of income. -Describe how a country’s economy developand show that this evolution is compatible only with a disaggregate view of the world. -Rephrase the question of economic integration as a question of learning in a world in which economic development is path dependent, complementing conceptualizations of trade that only emphasize gains in efficiency coming from reassignment of production /tasks. MEASURE UNDERSTAND DESCRIBE/STRATEGIZE RE-THINK INTEGRATION

  9. 1 Measure (the relative number of capabilities in a country)

  10. Intuition

  11. 1.- A Country 3.- Can make many products 2.- with a greatdiversity of Legos(capabilities)

  12. BUT…

  13. then..

  14. In Network Language Simple and and and and Complex = =

  15. kc,0 kc,1 kc,2 Simple Complex

  16. (Year 2000) Data by Feenstra 129 countries 772 products (SITC-4) How common are those Lego models(Average Ubiquity of a Country’s Products/average Number of countries that alse makes the products you make ) kc,1 kc,0 Number of Lego Models That You Make (Diversification of a country/Number of Products a country makes) Hidalgo, Hausmann (2009)PNAS 106(26):10570-10575

  17. 2 understand

  18. kc,0 kc,1 kc,2 Simple Complex Hidalgo, Hausmann (2009) PNAS

  19. Countries approach a level of income which is determined by the complexity of their economies!!! Complexity in 1985 (Controlling for GDP per capita at ppp) Hidalgo, Hausmann (2009) PNAS 106(26):10570-10575

  20. 2.5 connect(with current matters…)

  21. Countries before the Financial Crisis Countries with an Income that “cannot” be sustained by the complexity of their economies R2=64% Countries with ample room to grow Data for 2005, Source Bacii Dataset from Cepii. Products disaggregated in HS-6 (5109 product categories)

  22. 3 describe How do countries accumulate capabilities?

  23. The Product Space

  24. CA Hidalgo, B Klinger, A-L Barabasi, R Hausmann.Science (2007)

  25. Hidalgo et a. Science (2007) Patterns of Comparative Advantage

  26. Malaysia 1975

  27. Malaysia 1980

  28. Malaysia 1985

  29. Malaysia 1990

  30. Malaysia 1995

  31. Malaysia 2000

  32. If I am a country: If I am a firm

  33. 4 re-think growth

  34. Why is trade/oppennes beneficial? Gains from trade If we can all do everything, but we are not equally good at doing each individual thing… then we will always benefit from trading… But, what if we do not know how to do everything? What If it is not justa problem of more efficiently redistributing work?!!!! If the problem of development is that of accumulating capabilities.. And production depends on the existence of a diverse set of complementary economic activities .. Then how does a country acquire this individual capabilities, and their complements? Can countries learn from their trade partners?… Do countries learn from their neighbors? Could the .. Gains from Trade come from Learning,rather than redistributive gains in efficiency?

  35. FACT: Countriestend to have productive Structure that are Similar to that of their neighbors Can this be explained by induction? Do capabilities spread Geographically? Two predictions of induction are: 1.- Geographical range of production will form clusters that will grow at the borders. 2.- Similarity between countries will grow with integration.

  36. EVIDENCE 1: The production of some products tends to diffuse geographically!!! Dresses of woven textile fabrics Exported product in 1970’s Started exporting 1980’s Started exporting in 1990’s

  37. EVIDENCE 1: The production of some products tends to diffuse geographically!!! Sesame Seeds Exported product in 1970’s Started exporting 1980’s Started exporting in 1990’s

  38. SIMILARITY INDEX IN EUROPEAN UNION IN 1970

  39. BUT 35 YEARS AFTERWARDS…

  40. LITHUANIA ENTERED THE EU IN 2004 Similarity between LTU and DEU

  41. Over Time the productive structures of JAPAN AND KOREA have grown to be very similar Similarity between JPN and KOR

  42. Good with added value Material 2 Process 2 Capability Expansion  Good with more added value Process 1 Good with added value Material 2 Input-Output Expansion  Finish Wood

  43. from the: Center for International DevelopmentCID, Harvard Univeristy Thanks!(info @ www.chidalgo.com,or google “cesar hidalgo”)Hidalgo et al. Science (2007)Hidalgo Hausmann, Development Alternatives (2008)Hidalgo Hausmann, PNAS (2009) Cesar A. Hidalgo, Research Fellow, Center for International Development, Harvard UniversityAdjunct Lecturer in Public Policy, Harvard Kennedy School Ricardo Hausmann, Director, Center for International Development, Harvard UniversityProfessor of the Practice of Economic Development, Harvard Kennedy School

More Related