Sheila cryan and rania spyropoulou eea
Download
1 / 28

Sheila Cryan and Rania Spyropoulou EEA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 155 Views
  • Uploaded on

Data issues and outreach BIODIVERITY Clearing house meeting INSPIRE thematic group on protected sites CDDA- nationally designated areas Article 17-Reporting conservation status. Sheila Cryan and Rania Spyropoulou EEA.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Sheila Cryan and Rania Spyropoulou EEA' - selma-terrell


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Sheila cryan and rania spyropoulou eea

Data issues and outreach BIODIVERITY Clearing house meetingINSPIRE thematic group on protected sitesCDDA- nationally designated areasArticle 17-Reporting conservation status

Sheila Cryan and Rania Spyropoulou

EEA


The Biodiversity Clearing House Mechanisms in Europe: Challenges for the next 3 years, 15-16 September 2008

  • http://biodiversity-chm.eea.europa.eu/About/chm-meeting-biodiversity-clearing-house/meeting-agenda


Challenges for the next 3 years
Challenges for the next 3 years Challenges for the next 3 years, 15-16 September 2008

  • Session I : Introduction and Framing

  • Session II : The forum of national CHM managers

  • Session III: Development of strategy and action plan for a European CHM

  • Session  IV : The forum of EC CHM users

  • Session  V: Joint session with GBIF European nodes on sharing biodiversity data and information


Biodiversity clearing house mechanism http biodiversity chm eea europa eu seis next developments
Biodiversity Clearing House Mechanism: Challenges for the next 3 years, 15-16 September 2008http://biodiversity-chm.eea.europa.eu/SEIS- Next developments

  • Enable multilingual search on terms related to the Convention of Biological Diversity and European headline indicators in the CHM network ----- GLOSSARY

  • Promote syndication as the assessment of headline indicators for the 2010 target, to be harvested at the European and national CHMs --Really Simple Syndication

  • Harvesting quality controlled information among CHM portals and other national portals for 2010!---PORTAL COLLABORATION

  • Enable database management from the CHM portal thus linking to biodiversity reporting and databases such as GIBF--CAMPAINGS


Bring the message home
BRING THE MESSAGE HOME! Challenges for the next 3 years, 15-16 September 2008

  • Harvesting quality controlled information among CHM portals and other national portals for 2010!---PORTAL COLLABORATION

  • Making things work


Inspire annex one themes thematic working group on protected sites
INSPIRE – ANNEX ONE THEMES- Challenges for the next 3 years, 15-16 September 2008Thematic Working group on protected sites

The Thematic Working Group

  • Thematic experts:

    Rania Spyropoulou and Franz Daffner (EEA), Dirk Hinterlang (Germany),

    Keith Porter and Andrew Newman (England)

  • Contact person of EC: JRC, Vanda de Lima

  • Editor: Kristin Stock

  • Facilitator: Markus Seifert


Definition of protected sites
Definition of “Protected Sites” Challenges for the next 3 years, 15-16 September 2008

  • In the INSPIRE Annex I context a protected site is: An area of land and/or sea especially dedicated to the protection and maintenance of biological diversity, and of natural and associated cultural resources, and managed through legal or other effective means.

  • Under the INSPIRE directive protected sites are spatial objects, that need to have distinct boundaries of their own, rather than being a mere specific category of some other spatial object type (e.g. cadastral parcels).


Project schedule
Project schedule Challenges for the next 3 years, 15-16 September 2008

  • Kick-off meeting: 14.02.2008, Ispra, Italy

  • TWG Meetings: 23./24.04.2008, Munich, Germany

  • 25.06.2008, Maribor, Slovenia

  • 18./19.08.2008, Nottingham, England

  • Deadline for submitting the Data Prodict Specification (DPS):

  • 30.09.2008

  • Telconferences had been held biweekly.


The INSPIRE Protected Sites Data Product Specification. Challenges for the next 3 years, 15-16 September 2008 All INSPIRE-compliant data sets must use one of these profiles and must specify which is used

  • The profiles are as follows:

  • Simple (Core): The simple profile contains a very limited set of fundamental attributes, including geometry, identifier, name, designation type, legal foundation date and document reference. Only current Protected Areas are included. The Simple Profile is a subset of the Full Profile.

  • Full: The full model including all attributes and historical as well as current Protected Areas, but with most attributes being optional, so values be omitted.

  • Natura2000: The full model with all attributes and historical as well as current Protected Areas, and with mandatory attributes required for updating and maintaining of Natura2000 site data by Member States. Member States may use this profile to provide Natura2000 site data. The Natura2000 Profile is the same as the Full Profile but applies additional constraints.


Next steps
Next steps: Challenges for the next 3 years, 15-16 September 2008

  • Internal consultation on the first draft of DPS: 15.10.2008

  • Second draft of DPS: 28.11.2008

  • SDIC/LMO Review: 30.01.2009

  • Final specification 31.03.2009

  • During the review phase there will be an implementation test by SDICs and LMOs.


1997 2007 10 years of work on nationally designated areas
1997-2007 :10 years of work on Nationally designated areas Challenges for the next 3 years, 15-16 September 2008

  • The 2007 Expert review of the ECDDA national data flow was taken up and the users as well as the data managers have given their assessments

    Aiming at

  • Improving its usability

  • Improving its cost effectiveness


1997 2007 10 years of work on nationally designated areas1
1997-2007 :10 years of work on Nationally designated areas Challenges for the next 3 years, 15-16 September 2008

  • EEA Quality control is automated since 2007 for all countries

  • Attribute Size provided for 98% of sites (2007, EEA countries)

  • Attribute Boundaries provided for 92% of sites (2007, EEA countries)

  • Attribute IUCN category provided for 84% of sites (2007, EEA countries)


A synchronised full update of our protected areas products on Data Service. These products together comprise a first package of the European Common Database on Designated areas (national and Eu designations).

  • List of products and links to Eea Data Service :

  • - an updated nationally designated areas (CDDA) dataset for EEA member coutries - tabular data and site boundary data plus the overall quality control report and the countries reports http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/dataservice/metadetails.asp?id=1047

  • - the updated CDDA site distribution map for EEA member countries

  • http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/atlas/viewdata/viewpub.asp?id=3685

  • - the updated CDDA site boundary map for EEA member countries

  • http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/atlas/viewdata/viewpub.asp?id=3686

  • -the updated Natura 2000 sites map ( version July 2008)

  • http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/atlas/viewdata/viewpub.asp?id=3689&EditForm=no


1997 2007 10 years of work on nationally designated areas2
1997-2007 :10 years of work on Nationally designated areas on Data Service. These products together comprise a first package of the European Common Database on Designated areas (national and Eu designations).

  • Can we calculate total area of sites?

  • Can wecalculate overlaps with Natura 2000 sites?

  • Can we distinguish and show correctly marine sites?

  • Have we good quality coverage of neighbouring areas (e.g. ECCA countries)

  • New!Only size (area) and boundaries have been used so far in assessments.

  • There are some problems to solve!


Version 7 5 of cdda is out and ready
Version 7.5 of CDDA is out and ready on Data Service. These products together comprise a first package of the European Common Database on Designated areas (national and Eu designations).

  • A few countries were invited to resubmit

  • Most of them met the deadline

  • Barcelona- World Conservation Congress : an EEA side event on 7th October featuring the EIONET and CDDA- will send information


The next reporting round cdda national
The next reporting round-CDDA national on Data Service. These products together comprise a first package of the European Common Database on Designated areas (national and Eu designations).

  • Letter to be send out by November

  • Deadline March 2009

  • Input to SOER

  • PLEASE LOOK AT YOUR COUNTRYs FEEDBACK REPORT- some countries have issues to ressolve


Parameters used in the assessment of the conservation status of a species or habitat type in Article 17 reporting


ad