1 / 28

ESC 2011

ESC 2011. Nick Collins September 2011. What’s Hot… Lining up Enormous > 30, 000 delegates Guidelines ESC TAVI Refreshing Oral anticoagulation Focus Chocolate Crepes. What’s Not…. Foie Gras Too rich Almangac Too much burning of oral mucosa Prasugrel Ticagrelor Clopidogrel

saul
Download Presentation

ESC 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ESC 2011 Nick Collins September 2011

  2. What’s Hot… • Lining up • Enormous • > 30, 000 delegates • Guidelines • ESC • TAVI • Refreshing • Oral anticoagulation • Focus • Chocolate Crepes • What’s Not…. • Foie Gras • Too rich • Almangac • Too much burning of oral mucosa • Prasugrel • Ticagrelor • Clopidogrel • Warfarin

  3. Outline • Overview • Not reviewed paper • Simultaneously published • Summary • Pique interest • Details lacking • Jonathan…..

  4. ARISTOTLE • Seminal paper • Most interest • Apixiban • Factor Xa inhibitor • Differs to dabigatran • ROCKET AF • Rivaroxaban • Potency • Reflection dose • Dosing wars • Double blind • Non inferior compared to warfarin

  5. ARISTOTLE • NEJM • Background • AVERROES • Aspirin vsapixaban • AF/risk factor • 40% discontinued warfarin/60% “ineligible” • CHADS2 2.1 • Terminated – superiority apixaban • APPRAISE • ACS • DAPT • Terminated • Lack of efficacy • Excess bleeding

  6. Randomised non inferiority • 18,201 patients • 1034 in 39 countries • Apixaban 5mg bdvswarfarin (INR 2-3) • AF plus one risk factor • 70% excreted faeces • Issue renal impairment • Dagibatran

  7. ARISTOTLE • Median follow up 1.8 years • Primary outcome • Stroke/systemic embolisation • 1.27% vs 1.6% • HR 0.79; p<0.001 for non inferiority • Death • 3.52% vs 3.94%; p=ns • Haemorrhagic stroke • 0.24% vs 0.47% • HR 0.51; p<0.001 • Ischaemic stroke • 0.97% vs 1.05%; p=ns

  8. ARISTOTLE • Major bleeding • 327 apixabanvs 462 warfarin • Conclusion • 1000 patients treated • Prevent six strokes • 15 major bleeds • 8 deaths

  9. ENGAGE AF • Satellite symposia • 90 minutes….. • Edoxaban • Completed enrollment • Event driven trial • Two doses • Ability to adjust according to change in weight/Cr • Incorporate

  10. Beyond AF • Factor Xa inhibitors • Rivaroxaban ACS • RUBY 1 • Darexaban • EHJ • Multicentre, double blind phase II dose finding study • Stabilised ACS • 1279 patients • One of six doses • Bleeding end point • Dose dependent increase in bleeding compared to placebo • No difference secondary end point – incorporating death/MI

  11. CORP • Colchicinevs placebo • Annals Internal Medicine • ESC Guidelines Class I • Four Italian centres • 120 patients recurrent pericarditis • Conventional treatment (Aspirin/NSAIDs) vs conventional treatment and colchicine (1-2mg daily for 24 hours then 0.5-1mg daily for six months)

  12. CORP • 18 months • Recurrence • 24% colchicine group vs 55% placebo • Symptom persistence at 72 hours • 23.3% vs 53.3% • No safety differences/drug withdrawal • Small • Reinforces previously published data (CORE/COPE)

  13. Angry (Cardiologists)…. • Abstract • Pisa, Italy • 228 patients post MI • Complete questionaires • Anger • Cattells Sixteen Personality Factors Questionaire • Stress related disturbance • Psy-inventory scales • Followed for median 97 months

  14. Subjects with high anger scores • 2.3 fold risk of new event • High stress scores • 1.9 fold higher risk • As a prognostic determinant, anger measures outweigh LVEF, lipids and heart rate variability • Ongoing research • Treatment to learn self management for behavioural change

  15. SHIFT Echo Substudy • SHIFT ESC 2010 • 6500 patients • LVEF <35%/clinical heart failure • Ivabradine 5mg bd or placebo to usual treatment with elevated heart rates • 18% RRR for combined end point CV death/hospitalisation • Substudy • EHJ • Echo • Quality of life • 611 patients • 304 ivabradine

  16. SHIFT Echo Substudy • Primary end point • Change in LVESVi between baseline and eight months • LVESVi reduced by 13mL vs no change in placebo • Improvements LVEF noted • Advantage • Biventricular pacing • Sinus rhythm

  17. RESET • Fascinating….. • All comers trial • Japan • Angiographic substudy • SES vs EES • Pointless • Xience V – worldwide…. • 3197 patients • SES 1567 vs EES 1600 • TLR • 571 substudy • Angiography 8 months • In segment late loss/angiographic restenosis

  18. RESET • TLR • Low • 4.3% vs 5.0% (p<0.0001 non inferiority) • In segment loss/in stent – No difference • Clinical subgroups • Age • Haemodialysis • Diabetic • Insulin • Trend….x2 • EES • Subgroup - SYNTAX

  19. More EES Action… • Alleviate concerns….. • Frightfully worried about loss of SES • Bern-Rotterdam cohort study • Superior EES • Address VLST (ie > 12 months post implantation) • Total 12339 • 4212 EES vs 3819 SES vs 4308 PES • Follow up >95% • Cumulative follow up – four years • 0.6% EES vs 1.6% SES vs 2.4% PES • Benefit greater (ie curves diverge) after one year

  20. PRODIGY • Duration DAPT after PCI • Six months vs 24 months • Guidelines 12 months • Ferrara, Italy • Multicentre study • 2000 patients • Elective/emergent PCI • Complex randomisation process…

  21. PRODIGY • EES vs ZES vs PES vs BMS • 30 days • Randomised to 6 vs 24 months clopidogrel • Primary end point • Death/MI or stroke • 10.1% (24month) vs 10% (6 month) • Bleeding • BARC classification • HR 2.17

  22. CRISP AMI • Nonsense • Randomised study IABP vs usual therapy in acute anterior AMI • Animal data prior IABP reduces infarct size/myocardial salvage • Before….. • Door to balloon/aspiration? • Surgeons hoarding….

  23. CRISP AMI • IABP 161 vs Standard 176 • Mean infarct size • %LV mass by MRI • 42.1% IABP vs 37.5% • No difference bleeding/vascular complications/ need for transfusion at 30 days • Not routine • Small • Safety

  24. Chocolate Meta Analysis • BMJ • Possible benefits chocolate consumption • Antioxidant/inflammatory/hypertensive/ thrombotic • Endothelial function • Insulin sensitivity • Seven studies • 100,000 participants • Compared high vs low consumption

  25. Chocolate Meta Analysis • Results • 37% decrease in CVD • 29% decrease risk stroke • No association heart failure • Importantly • No differentiation between chocolate type • Caution re caloric intake

  26. OAT • Two OAT related notes • Practice • US Data • No change in practice • Guilty • “I don’t want to believe” • Late follow up • Unable to publish • OAT NEJM • TOSCA – II - Circulation • No change in survival • DES better vs BMS

  27. ASCOT • EHJ • Follow up lipid lowering arm ASCOT study • Completed 8 years ago • All cause mortality lower in treatment group • Most on statins • Non CV death • Hypothesis • Death from infection • “Hypothesis that there remains a longer term legacy effect”

  28. In Summary • Excellent meeting • Superb food, wine and company • Long flight • Oral anticoagulation landscape • Changing • Incorporate new data/agents • Interest

More Related