1 / 29

Recovery Services in the Era of Health Care Reform: Federal and State Perspectives

Recovery Services in the Era of Health Care Reform: Federal and State Perspectives. Susan Brandau, Director, Bureau of Recovery SusanBrandau@oasas.ny.gov. “ Behavioral Health”: SAMHSA. State of mental/emotional being and/or choices and actions that affect wellness ;

sanne
Download Presentation

Recovery Services in the Era of Health Care Reform: Federal and State Perspectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recovery Services in the Era of Health Care Reform: Federal and State Perspectives Susan Brandau, Director, Bureau of Recovery SusanBrandau@oasas.ny.gov

  2. “Behavioral Health”: SAMHSA • State of mental/emotional being and/or choices and actions that affect wellness; • Includes substance use, misuse, abuse, addiction; SPD; suicide, mental and substance use disorders; • Range of problems- unhealthy stress to diagnosable, chronic diseases (treatable and recovery-oriented) • Systems: emotional health promotion; prevention, treatment and recovery support

  3. The Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act: Four Interlocking Strategies • Insurance Reform (parity) • Coverage Expansion (30 million; 1 million in NY) • Delivery System Redesign • Payment Reform (P4P; Value-based purchasing; episodes of care)

  4. PCMHs; HHs; ACOsWhat Are They? • The Triple Aim: Better Health; Better Quality; Reduced Costs • Movement from a specialty-driven, FFS, volume-driven system to a primary care, managed system • Reconnect the mind and the body • Improve the overall health of the nation; the effectiveness of the care delivered; at reduced cost (right service at the right time at the right price)

  5. Patient-Centered Medical Home The center of the health care delivery system reform: • Integrates pts. as active participants • Personal physician team leader (not the MD’s team– the patient’s team) • Coordinates all aspects of preventive, acute and chronic care • Whole person-oriented care • Pt. satisfaction & experience of care • Quality of care/metrics • Payment reform (incentivizing PCPs) • Integrated Clinical Information Systems (HIT) • https://inetshop01.pub.ncqa.org/publications/product.asp?dept_id=2&pf_id=30004-301-11.

  6. Health Homes • Target: one chronic health condition and at least at risk for another (SMI exception) • A longitudinal home; inter-disciplinary array of medical, behavioral health care and community-based social services • 90% FMAP for HH services for two years • 12 states approved SPAs by CMS • 5 states include SMI eligibility • 3 states include SUD eligibility (plus one other chronic condition; NY; OR;MO) • http://www.health.ny.gov/health_care/medicaid/program/medicaid_health_homes/meetings_webinars.htm

  7. HH Services Networks provide: • Comprehensive care management • Coordination and Health Promotion • Transitional Care • Referral to social services and community supports • Use of HIT

  8. Health and Recovery Plans (HARPs) • Premiums include all MA State Plan services. • Specialized, integrated MC product for individuals with significant BH needs • Enhanced benefit package of medical, behavioral and social benefits • Enhanced access and care coordination standards • RFI—October/November; Final RFQ– Feb. 2014; NYC HARP—Jan. 2015; ROS HARP– July 2015 • Statewide 140,000 HARP eligible; ~37,000 SUD • Eligibility initially based on UR

  9. Behavioral Health Organizations (BHOs) in New York • 2011: Introduced managed care operations to MA FFS IP settings (but eventually all BH care settings) • Originally: no UR; no pre-admission review • Discharge planning; concurrent review; provider profiling • 2014: risk-bearing for all BH services

  10. 1915(i) Like Services • Part of the 1115 SPA– final submission to CMS in December • Rehabilitation & Habilitation • Crisis Intervention • Educational Support • Support Services • CM; Fam Support.; Training for Unpaid Caregivers; Non-Medical Transportation • Employment Services • Peer Support • Self-Directed Services • Eligibility based on Functional Needs Assessment

  11. SUD 1915(i) Like Peer Services (perhaps) MH Administered by trained individual Personal experience of a MH dx. Assist in the recovery process Psychosocial clubs For individuals engaged or not engaged in treatment? Administered by a trained (certified?) individual personal experience of SUD dx. Recovery coaches? Recovery center settings? For individuals not engaged in treatment

  12. Peer Services (APGs) • Face- to- face service provided by a peer advocate to an active patient of an outpatient clinic. Peer support services are clinic-based services for the purpose of connecting patients to community based recovery supports consistent with the treatment / recovery plan. • Under rehab option, peer services can be delivered off-site for those in treatment.

  13. What Does It All Mean For BH Providers? • Threats and Opportunities • PCMH Opportunity: Outstationing a BH specialist for SBI; the RT function • New business lines • Care management/case management • Behavioral interventions: adherence • SBIRT • Integrated BH and PC services • Peer-based Services • MAT • Clinical & Fiscal Accountability • Performance on Medical as well as Behavioral Metrics • Supervision • EBPs • Risk Sharing? • Mergers and Consolidations • Digital World • HIT Infrastructure

  14. ATR as a Prototype for Recovery Support Services • Four year, $13 million CSAT grant • Brooklyn, Rochester, Delaware/Otsego • Co-location with RCCs • Recent expansion: Bronx, Queens, Manhattan • 7,000 participants served to date • Monthly recovery care mgt + access to recovery supports

  15. Bringing Recovery Supports to Scale (BRSS) Policy Academy • OASAS, OMH, DOH, Peers, MH & SUD Providers, Managed Care , Housing Providers • Focus: Peer Integration • Four Community Forums • Peer Leadership Training • Mini-grants: Community and Provider

  16. Peer Certification • Florida Certification Board • ASAP + FOR-NY • Role Delineation Study-Core Competencies and Skills • January, 2014 • Deeming of Recovery Coaches

  17. Peer Integration • Building capacity now to integrate peers • Fixsen’s Implementation Stages: Exploration Activities • Engagement and Retention Challenges • Culture Changes • Job Descriptions and Pay Scales • Supervision & Monitoring • Value of Alumni Associations

  18. Client/Participant Surveys • Essential Component of Health Reform • How do we know those we serve are getting what they want and need? • Routine surveys-perception of care linked to CQI • https://www.oasas.ny.gov/poc/index.cfm

  19. OASAS’ Adaptation of the SAHMSA-sponsored Modular Survey • 5 Domains : Rating Scales • A. Access and Quality (7 items) • B. Perceived Outcome (6 items) • C. Social Connectedness (7 items) • D. Readiness for Change (2 items) • E. Program Recommendation (2 items) • Open-ended Items (write-ins) • What is the program doing right? • What can be done to improve the program? • Is there anything that annoys you?

  20. Content of Survey (Continued) • Best Practices • Patient / Client Rights • Nicotine Replacement Therapy • Medication Supported Recovery • Other Items • Time in Program (months) • Age, Gender, Ethnicity / Race • Presenting Problem (SA, MH, or both) • Prior Treatment • Criminal Justice Mandate • Employment / School Enrollment Status

  21. A: Access and Quality 1. When I needed services right away, I was able to see someone as soon as I wanted. 2. This program helped me develop a plan for when I feel stressed, anxious or unsafe 3. The people I went to for services spent enough time with me. 4. I helped to develop my service/treatment goals. 5. The people I went to for services were sensitive to my cultural background (race, religion, language, sexual orientation). 6. I was given information about different services that were available to me. 7. I was given enough information to effectively handle my problems.

  22. B: Perceived Outcome As a result of the services (treatment) I have received ... 8. I am less bothered by my symptoms 9. I am better able to cope when things go wrong. 10. I am better able to accomplish the things I want to do. 11. I am not likely to use alcohol and/or other drugs. 12. I am doing better at work/school. (If this does not apply to you, please leave it blank.) 13. I get along with my teachers/boss. (If this does not apply to you, please leave it blank.)

  23. C: Social Connectedness 14. There is someone who cares about whether I am doing better. 15. I have someone who will help when I have a problem. 16. I have people in my life who are a positive influence. 17. The people I care about are supportive of my recovery. 18. People count on me to help them when they have a problem. 19. I have friends who are clean and sober. 20. I have someone who will listen to me when I need to talk.

  24. D: Readiness for Change • Using alcohol and/or drugs is a problem for me. • I need to work on my problems with alcohol and/or drugs.

  25. E: Program Recommendation (Satisfaction) • I would return to this program if I need help in the future • 24. I would recommend this program to a friend or family member.

  26. Survey Reports • The Survey System will compile a report based on the most current data; and includes the date on which the report was generated • Reports can be generated at any time during or after data collection • It is important to assure that interim reports do not get confused with reports after data collection is complete. • The report provides tabulations and graphics for each survey item • Refer to the PoCUser Guide section “Interpreting Reports” for examples of reports and tabulations

  27. Interpreting Reports

  28. Interpreting Reports

  29. Acknowledgement • Frank McCorry-graciously allowed some of his slides to be shared-thank you Frank!

More Related