Health care reform is it for real this time around l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 64

Health Care Reform: Is it for real this time around? PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Health Care Reform: Is it for real this time around? Bob Doherty Senior Vice President, Governmental Affairs and Public Policy American College of Physicians Alaska Chapter June 25 , 2009 Questions What do the voters want? Why has Obama made it a priority?

Download Presentation

Health Care Reform: Is it for real this time around?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Health care reform is it for real this time around l.jpg

Health Care Reform: Is it for real this time around?

Bob Doherty

Senior Vice President, Governmental Affairs and Public Policy

American College of Physicians

Alaska Chapter

June 25 , 2009


Questions l.jpg

Questions

  • What do the voters want?

  • Why has Obama made it a priority?

  • How is health care reform occurring?

  • What are the key issues for ACP?


Slide3 l.jpg

Voters express a strong desire for change in our health care system, with over two-thirds saying we need a complete overhaul or major reform.

Does our health care system need complete overhaul, major reform, minor reform or no reform at all?

69%

3


Slide4 l.jpg

Voters’ greatest dissatisfaction is with the rising cost of health care and the lack of coverage for everyone. While they trust their doctors’ training and the quality of care, over one-third are dissatisfied with prevention of medical errors.

Now I am going to read you some different aspects of the health care system in the U.S. For each one, tell me how SATISFIED you are with that aspect of our health care system – VERY satisfied, SOMEWHAT satisfied, SOMEWHAT unsatisfied, or VERY unsatisfied.

81%

29%

62%

33%

38%

52%

72%

16%

78%

4


Slide5 l.jpg

Support for reform is strong across all the important political groups, with the strongest support among Democrats and Independents, and with over half of Republican voters on board.

Initial Reform Ballot


Slide6 l.jpg

While opposition messages raise some doubts for voters, they are much weaker than supporting messages. Interfering with the doctor is the strongest concept in opposition messages.

Now I am going to read you a series of statements people have made in opposition to some of these health system changes. Please tell me whether each raises serious doubts, some doubts, minor doubts, or no real doubts in your own mind about reforms to the health care system. If you are not sure how you feel about a particular item, please say so.

In a head-to-head contest, even after hearing opposition arguments, support for health system reform remains strong, with a +29 point margin favoring reform (56% support, 27% oppose).


Slide7 l.jpg

The broad consensus in support of health system reforms remains robust – even after hearing opposition arguments.

Final Reform Ballot


Health care reform is top obama priority l.jpg

Health care reform is top Obama priority

“Health care reform cannot wait, it must not wait, and it will not wait another year.”

President Obama, WH Summit on Health Reform, March 5, 2009


Why because obama believes current system is not sustainable l.jpg

Why? Because Obama believes current system is not sustainable

  • For individuals and families

  • For the economy

  • For the federal budget


Not sustainable for individuals l.jpg

Not sustainable for individuals

  • “Wages earned by American households will become too small a donkey to carry the load of the family’s spending on health care.”

    • A family who today has a gross wage base of $60,000 might see it grow by 3 percent per year over the next decade, to $80,600 by 2017

    • For the same family, total health spending might grow by 8 percent per year over the same time frame, to $33,700 by 2017.

    • For this worker, 41 percent of the family’s gross wage base would be taken up by health care alone, before any deductions for taxes or fringe benefits.

      Economist Uwe Reinhardt, accessed November 10 at http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/the-health-care-challenge-sailing-into-a-perfect-storm


Not sustainable for the federal budget l.jpg

Not sustainable for the federal budget

  • “Slowing the growth rate of health care costs will prevent disastrous increases in the Federal budget deficit.”

  • “Medicare and Medicaid expenditures are projected to rise from the current 6 percent of GDP to 15 percent in 2040. Only about one-quarter of this rise is due to the projected demographic shifts in the population … remaining three-quarters is due to the fact that health care costs are projected to increase faster than GDP.”

    The Economic Case for Health Reform, Council of Economic Advisors, accessed June 2 2009 at www.whitehouse.gov/assets/documents/CEA_Health_Care_Report.pdf


Total outlays in billions l.jpg

Total outlays in billions

Not sustainable for government and taxpayers:

Projected Medicare Outlays, 2008-2018

16% 16% 16% 17% 17% 18% 18% 19% 20% 20% 20%

3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4%

Share of:

Federal Budget

Gross Domestic Product

NOTE: Numbers have been rounded to nearest whole number. SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation, based on Congressional Budget Office, The Budget and Economic Outlook: An Update, January 2008.


Medicare beneficiaries and the number of workers per beneficiary l.jpg

Medicare Beneficiaries and The Number of Workers Per Beneficiary

Number of workers per beneficiary

Millions of beneficiaries

SOURCE: Kaiser Family Foundation, based on 2001 and 2008 Annual Reports of the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Funds.


How will health care reform occur l.jpg

How will health care reform occur?

  • First stages:

    • Re-authorization of SCHIP

    • Stimulus legislation (“down payment” on health reform)

    • Budget

  • Now:

    • Comprehensive health care reform legislation in both chambers before August recess


Acp priorities for health reform l.jpg

ACP priorities for health reform

  • Affordable coverage for all

  • Reverse shortage of primary care physicians

    • Medical education and financing

    • Payment reform


Reason for concern usmd pc preferences and practice l.jpg

Reason for Concern: USMD PC Preferences and Practice

Our analysis shows that declining interest in primary care is leading to a decline in supply

Practice following preferences

Preferences equal to the all-time low

Sources: AAMC Graduation Questionnaire (preferences), AMA Masterfile (practice), Altarum analysis (forecast)


Why does it matter l.jpg

Why does it matter?

  • Demand for primary care is increasing

  • Primary care is associated with better outcomes and lower costs


Acp review of impact of primary care on outcomes and costs l.jpg

ACP review of impact of primary care on outcomes and costs

  • States with higher ratios of primary care physicians to population have better health outcomes, including mortality from cancer, heart disease or stroke

  • An increase of just one primary care physician is associated with 1.44 fewer deaths per 10,000 persons

    How is a Shortage of Primary Care Physicians Affecting the Cost and Quality of Medical Care: A Comprehensive Literature Review, ACP, 2008


Acp review of impact of primary care on outcomes and costs19 l.jpg

ACP review of impact of primary care on outcomes and costs

  • During the year 2000, an estimated 5 million admissions to U.S. hospitals may have been preventable with high quality primary and preventive care treatment; the resulting cost was more than $26.5 billion.

  • A 5 percent decrease in the rate of potentially avoidable hospitalizations alone could reduce inpatient costs by more than $1.3 billion

    How is a Shortage of Primary Care Physicians Affecting the Cost and Quality of MedicalCare: A Comprehensive Literature Review, ACP, 2008


Slide20 l.jpg

Solving the problem requires a multi-faceted approach

How influential were the following factors in determining your specialty choice?*2008 AAMC Graduation Questionnaire


Create a national workforce policy l.jpg

Create a national workforce policy

  • Problem:

    • Workforce based on institutional needs, not national priorities

  • Solution:

    • Commission to establish goals including primary care physicians, policies to achieve them, and benchmarks for success


Improve primary care training l.jpg

Improve primary care training

  • Problem:

    • Students and residents not exposed to well-functioning primary care practices

  • Solution:

    • Eliminate barriers to training in ambulatory settings

    • Increase funding for primary care training programs

    • Grants for primary care mentorship programs and faculty and curricula development


Eliminate student debt l.jpg

Eliminate student debt

  • Problem:

    • Average debt burden of public school graduates was over $145,000

    • High debt = less likely to choose primary care

  • Solution:

    • Scholarship and loan repayment awards

    • Allow deferment of educational loans


Increase primary care gme capacity l.jpg

Increase Primary Care GME Capacity

  • Problem:

    • GME slots are capped so that we cannot produce enough primary care physicians to meet demand

  • Solution:

    • Lift GME caps but require residency programs to give priority to general IM, family medicine, and pediatrics


Reduce administrative costs l.jpg

Reduce administrative costs

  • Problem:

    • Primary care physicians spend more time (3.5 hours weekly) than other medical specialists (2.6 hours) or surgical specialists (2.1 hours) on interactions with health plans

    • $64,859 annually per primary care physician - "nearly one-third of the income plus benefits of the average primary care physician.“

  • Solution:

    • Reduce hassles associated with formularies

    • Uniform billing, credentialing, and eligibility

      Casalino, et al, What Does it Cost Physician to Interact with Health Plans, Health Affairs, May 14, 2009 http://www.healthaffairs.org/press/mayjun0903.htm


Reform a dysfunctional payment system l.jpg

Reform a dysfunctional payment system

  • Problem:

    • Current system rewards volume not quality or value

    • No incentive to collaborate across settings

    • Primary care not competitive with other fields

  • Solution:

    • New payment models to align incentives with patient-centered primary care

    • Increase FFS to make primary care ompetitive


New payment models are needed l.jpg

New payment models are needed!

  • Federal government should fundpilot tests of new models to align incentives with value

  • Then expand successful ones nationwide into Medicare and other public programs

  • Criteria should be used to evaluate and prioritize selection of new models


Traditional ffs medical care version 1965 l.jpg

Traditional FFS Medical Care: Version 1965

  • Based on the way that care was provided forty years ago—not the way it is delivered today

    • patients treated only when sick (acute condition)

    • little or no emphasis on prevention and coordination

    • care based on doctor’s best judgment as informed by CME and journals but not on evidence-based guidelines

    • specific visit or procedure code

    • individuals not teams

    • “usual, customary, reasonable” (UCR)


Wanted new pay models for medical care version 2009 l.jpg

Wanted! New pay models forMedical Care: Version 2009

  • Medical care today:

    • prevention/management of illness rather than just treating disease

    • care rendered by coordinated teams of health professionals

    • clinical judgment informed by evidence-based clinical decision support

    • results matter (not just service rendered)

    • systems and processes of care to support better outcomes


New payment models should l.jpg

New payment models should:

  • Support patient-centered primary care

  • Create incentives to work across settings

  • Consider challenges faced by smaller practices

  • Be administrative feasible—practice level and administration by government


New payment models should31 l.jpg

New payment models should:

  • Support chronic disease prevention and management

  • Recognize quality and efficiency and reward appropriate stewardship of resources while promoting and maintaining high quality

  • Transition to a unit of payment that diminishes the incentive to increase volume, ensures appropriateness, and promotes greater accountability


Improve ffs l.jpg

Improve FFS

  • Average primary care income is 55% of the average of the medians all non-primary care specialties

  • AAFP Graham Center determined that the average non-primary care physician earns $3.5 million more over a 35-40 years

  • Specialty preferences among USMGs is correlated with PCP income as percentage of specialty income

    Robert Graham Center. Specialty and Geographic Distribution of the Physician Workforce: What Influences Medical Student & Resident Choices? March 2009.

    Ebell MH. Future salary and US residency fill rate revisited. JAMA. 2008;300(10):1131-1132


Slide33 l.jpg

Primary Care Income Less Than Most Other SpecialtiesMedian Salary by Specialty in thousands of dollars, 2006

Source: MGMA Physician Compensation and Production Survey, 2007; slide from AAMC Physician Workforce Research Conference, IM Subspecialty Meeting, April 29, 2009

Source: MGMA Physician Compensation and Production Survey, 2007


Relationship between income and preferences l.jpg

Relationship Between Income and Preferences

USMD preferences move with relative incomes but relationship varies

PC Income as Percent of NPC Income

Sources: AAMC Graduation Questionnaire for preferences, MGMA data on incomes


Improve ffs35 l.jpg

Improve FFS

  • Medicare and other payers should increase primary care compensation to be competitive with other specialties

  • Replace the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) and cycle of ongoing Medicare cuts

  • Establish a mechanism to assess impact of primary care on other aspects of the Medicare program, e.g. Part A, and apply such anticipated savings to increase payments to primary care

  • Improve accuracy of relative values


Growing support for primary care l.jpg

Growing Support for Primary Care

  • We're not producing enough primary care physicians.”

    President Obama, White House Summit on Health Reform, March 5, 2009


Growing support for primary care37 l.jpg

Growing Support for Primary Care

“Primary care is the keystone of a high-performing health care system. Increasing the supply and availability of primary care practitioners by improving the value placed on their work is a necessary step toward meaningful reform.”

Senator Max Baucus, D-MT, Chair, Senate Finance Committee, White Paper on Health Reform


Growing support for primary care38 l.jpg

Growing Support for Primary Care

"We've upset the whole practice of medicine to such a point that we don't have many primary care givers. That has driven up the cost of medicine itself with emphasis on specialists, and it has reduced the quality of delivery, particularly in rural areas."

Senator Charles Grassley, R-IO, March 19, 2009

Kaiser Family Foundation, Health Reform Newsmaker Series, Senator Grassley’s full remarks are available at:

http://www.kaisernetwork.org/health_cast/player_kff.cfm?id=60#clip_1


Slide39 l.jpg

Figure 7. Promoting the growth of integrated delivery systems and increasing supply of PCPs though payment reform seen as most effective in reducing growth of health care costs.

“How effective do you think each of these proposals for structural change in health services markets would be in reducing the growth of health care costs?”

Source: Commonwealth Fund Health Care Opinion Leaders Survey, April 2009.


Preserving patient access to primary care act of 2009 h r 2350 s 1174 l.jpg

Preserving Patient Access to Primary Care Act of 2009, H.R. 2350/S. 1174

  • Introduced by Representative Allyson Schwartz on May 12, 2009 and on June 3 by Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Susan Collins (R-ME)

  • Comprehensive approach to primary care workforce crisis


Preserving patient access to primary care act of 2009 l.jpg

Preserving Patient Access to Primary Care Act of 2009

  • Primary care mentorship and curricula development

  • Scholarships and loan forgiveness, expanded GME and more ambulatory training

  • Increase Medicare FFS payments, apply savings in Part A to primary care, and pay for care coordination

  • Patient-Centered Medical Homes

  • Reduce hassles of Part D formularies and test “real time” claims adjudication


What about tort reform l.jpg

What about tort reform?

  • ACP believes that medical liability reform is essential

  • But caps on non-economic damages will not pass a Democratic Congress or be signed into law by Obama

  • Obama told AMA he was open to other ideas: health courts? Alternative dispute resolution? Safe harbors if following guidelines?


House draft health reform bill l.jpg

House draft health reform bill

Coverage

Consistent with ACP?

Yes

Yes

Yes

  • Medicaid expanded to cover the poor (133% of FPL)

  • Sliding scale tax credits for people above poverty level, up to 400% of FPL

  • People can keep own insurance or buy coverage through an exchange


House draft reform proposal l.jpg

House draft reform proposal

Coverage

Consistent with ACP?

Yes

  • Health plans must cover people with pre-existing conditions, guarantee renewability, not vary premiums except for age, gender and location


House draft reform proposal45 l.jpg

House draft reform proposal

Coverage

Consistent with ACP?

Yes

Yes

  • Commission to recommend covered benefits

  • Plans must provide essential benefits, including preventive services; no cost-sharing for preventive services


House draft reform proposal46 l.jpg

House draft reform proposal

Workforce

Consistent with ACP?

Yes

Yes

Yes

  • Advisory council to recommend workforce goals

  • Increased funding for NHSC and Title VII primary care programs

  • New scholarships/loan repayment for primary care physicians in areas of need


House draft reform proposal47 l.jpg

House draft reform proposal

Payment reform

Consistent with ACP?

Yes

Yes, but does not complete eliminate GDP. Provides GDP plus two for primary care, GDP plus one for other services.

Yes

  • Eliminates current SGR formula and accumulated cost

  • Higher updates for primary care (separate and higher spending target for primary care)

  • Medicaid pay for primary care increased to Medicare


House draft reform proposal48 l.jpg

House draft reform proposal

Payment reform

Consistent with ACP?

Yes, but ACP is pushing for a higher bonus

Yes, provides over $1 billion to fund pilot to pay qualified practices for care coordination

  • Bonus payments for primary care: 5% for designated services by primary care physicians, increased to 10% in health professional shortage areas

  • Patient-centered medical home to be tested on a national scale


House draft reform proposal49 l.jpg

House draft reform proposal

Administrative simplification

Consistent with ACP?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

  • Standardizelanguage and forms

  • Establish operating rules and companion guides for using and processing health care transactions

  • Increase consistency of claims edits and code corrections

  • Increase electronic exchange of administrative and clinical data


House draft reform proposal50 l.jpg

House draft reform proposal

Administrative simplification

Consistent with ACP?

Yes

Yes

Yes

  • Standardize quality reporting requirements

  • Development of “smart card” technology

  • Plans must spend at least 85% of premiums on patient care instead of administration


House draft reform proposal51 l.jpg

House draft reform proposal

Public plan

Consistent with ACP?

Yes and no—only some of ACP’s criteria for support were met:

Yes

  • Offers a public plan to compete with private insurers

  • Physician participation voluntary--not mandated if you also accept Medicare


House draft reform proposal52 l.jpg

House draft reform proposal

Public plan

Consistent with ACP?

No, ACP believes that Medicare rates are not adequate; safeguards need to be in place including independent assessment of plan’s payments compared to private sector and ensuring sufficient participation by physician specialty and locale

  • Medicare rates (plus 5% for physicians who participate in both Medicare and public plan) used for first 3 years, then plan would create own rates


House draft reform proposal53 l.jpg

House draft reform proposal

Public plan

Consistent with ACP?

Yes

Yes

Yes

  • Must offer essential benefits including prevention

  • Administered by separate entity than the federal agencies running the exchange

  • Financed by premiums not federal treasury


What is missing from the house plan l.jpg

What is missing from the House plan?

  • How much will it cost?

  • Who will pay?


What about the senate l.jpg

What about the Senate?

  • HELP committee is working on legislation that includes many of the primary care workforce and coverage proposals supported by ACP, similar to House bill

  • But SFC is working on a “scaled back” bill to cut the total cost; co-op idea being considered instead of a public plan


Next few weeks will tell us l.jpg

Next few weeks will tell us . . .

  • If there is a governing consensus in Congress (disagreements among the Democrats and the House and Senate are the biggest challenge)

  • Whether the public will continue to support it


New ny times poll l.jpg

New NY Times Poll

  • 72% support a public plan option, including overwhelming majority of Democrats and Independents and majority of Republicans

  • 85% believe that health care must be completely rebuilt or fundamentally changed, but 77% are “somewhat” satisfied with own care

  • Majority would pay higher taxes and most have more confidence in government to control costs

    NY Times, June 22, 2009


Stars are aligned obama but now comes the hard part l.jpg

“Stars are aligned” (Obama) but now comes the hard part

  • Mandates on employers, individuals

    • Pay or play

    • Minimum benefit packages/ERISA exemption

    • Penalties on individuals for non-compliance

  • “Rationing” and “taking decisions from your doctor”

    • This argument raises biggest doubts

    • Physicians will be key in how the public responds


Stars are aligned but now comes the hard part l.jpg

“Stars are aligned” but now comes the hard part

  • “Public plan” option (both sides suggest that it could lead to a “single payer” plan)

    • But what do they mean by a public plan?

    • Current dysfunctional Medicare rates? Or improved payments?

    • “Playing field” with other health plans?

  • Where does the money come from? Taxes on wealthy, taxes on health premiums?

  • The budget deficit


Conclusion l.jpg

Conclusion

  • “The stars are aligned” for comprehensive health care reform

    • Public wants it

    • Popular president had made it his top priority

    • Democrats have the votes—if they stay together

    • Current system is not sustainable

  • Obama will need to overcome deep divisions on public plan option, mandates, and taxes


Conclusion61 l.jpg

Conclusion

  • Policies on primary care must reflect urgency, be multi-faceted, and implemented concurrently

  • Payment reform to support patient-centered primary care is essential


Conclusion62 l.jpg

Conclusion

  • ACP priorities on workforce, primary care, coverage and payment reform are being addressed, but “you can’t always get what you want” *

  • There will be pain with the gain

  • But the alternative is a health care system that will collapse under the weight of rising costs

    *Source: Mick Jagger, Rolling Stones


What can you do l.jpg

What can you do?

  • Politics is not a spectator support:

    • Physicians have more influence over the outcome than anyone else

    • Why? Because the public trusts physicians!

    • Requires that each of you participate in the political process—starting with joining and supporting your physician advocacy organizations

    • Internists: sign up to become involved in ACP advocacy!

    • But don’t wait—next 8 weeks may define health care for generations


A marxist definition of politics l.jpg

A Marxist definition of politics

“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies”

Groucho (not Karl)

Our task: help find the real problems, diagnose them correctly, and get Congress to apply the right remedies


  • Login