1 / 19

Metop-B SIOV Meeting 13 November 2012, College Park, US

Metop-B SIOV Meeting 13 November 2012, College Park, US. Metop-B AVHRR Radiances in SST Bands: Preliminary Evaluation in MICROS (Update) www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/sod/sst/micros/ ( www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/sod/sst/xliang/test/micros_v6/ ) Xingming Liang and Sasha Ignatov

samuru
Download Presentation

Metop-B SIOV Meeting 13 November 2012, College Park, US

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Metop-B SIOV Meeting 13 November 2012, College Park, US Metop-B AVHRR Radiances in SST Bands: Preliminary Evaluation in MICROS (Update) www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/sod/sst/micros/ (www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/sod/sst/xliang/test/micros_v6/) Xingming Liang and Sasha Ignatov NOAA/NESDIS and CSU/CIRA With contributions from: SST – J. Stroup, Y. Kihai, B. Petrenko, J. Sapper, P. Dash CRTM – Y. Chen, P. Van Delst, M. Liu, D. Groff, F. Weng AVHRR Cal/GSICS – T. Chang, F. Wu, F. Yu, L. Wang, J. Xiong, C. Cao, T. Hewison Metop-B in MICROS

  2. MetopB Data Availability (High Res.) • NRT processing for MetopB has been added in MICROS V6 since Nov. 19, 2012. • MetopB data are stable, except for Nov. 12 (~1.50 hr missing). • Data gaps and unstable proc. time are mainly due to NOAA unstable network. 19 November 2012 Metop-B in MICROS 2

  3. MetopB Data Availability (GAC) • The MetopB GAC data are also stable. • Proc. time for MetopB GAC is ~7 times less than FRAC. 19 November 2012 Metop-B in MICROS 3

  4. M-O Biases and Double Differences (“DD”) • Model minus Observation (“M-O”) Biases • M (Model) = Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM) simulated TOA Brightness Temperatures (w/ Reynolds SST, GFS profiles as input) • O (Observation) = Clear-Sky sensor (AVHRR, MODIS, VIIRS) BTs • Double Differences (“DD”) for Cross-Platform Consistency • “M” used as a “Transfer Standard” • DDs cancel out/minimize effect of systematic errors & instabilities in BTs arising from e.g. • Errors/Instabilities in Reynolds SST & GFS • Missing aerosol • Possible systemic biases in CRTM • Updates to ACSPO algorithm • Metop-A and B fly the same orbit so should be very consistent Metop-B in MICROS

  5. Global M-O Biases compared to other platforms Metop-A Metop-B • Global distribution is compared with Metop-A • Cross-platform consistencies in IR37 and IR12 are within ~0.1 K. MetopB IR11 is out of family by ~+0.23K. • Angle dependencies is consistent with Metop-A, MODIS and VIIRS except for IR11. SST from NPP/VIIRS

  6. Channel 3B (3.7 µm) Night SST from NPP/VIIRS

  7. Night DD’s @3.7 µm – Low-Res (Ref=Metop-A GAC) Metop-B: ~+0.07K • In Ch 3B, Metop-B is warmer than Metop-A by +0.07K • It is unclear whether this delta is coming from differences in sensors or CRTM Metop-B in MICROS

  8. Night DD’s @3.7 µm – Hi-Res (Ref=Metop-A GAC) Metop-B: ~+0.07K • In Ch 3B, Metop-B is warmer than Metop-A by +0.07K • It is unclear whether this delta is coming from differences in sensors or CRTM Metop-B in MICROS

  9. Channel 4 (11 µm) Night SST from NPP/VIIRS

  10. Night DD’s @11 µm – Low-Res (Ref=Metop-A GAC) Metop-B: ~+0.23K • In Ch 4, Metop-B is warmer than Metop-A by +0.23K • It is unclear whether this delta is coming from differences in sensors or CRTM Metop-B in MICROS

  11. Night DD’s @11 µm – Hi-Res (Ref=Metop-A GAC) Metop-B: ~+0.23K Aqua & Terra: in family after switching from CRTM 2.02 to 2.1 • In Ch 4, Metop-B is warmer than Metop-A by +0.23K • It is unclear whether this delta is coming from differences in sensors or CRTM • Note that MODISs were ~0.5K out of family before CRTM 2.1 was implemented Metop-B in MICROS

  12. Channel 5 (12 µm) Night SST from NPP/VIIRS

  13. Night DD’s @12 µm – Low-Res (Ref=Metop-A GAC) Metop-B: ~-0.08K • In Ch 4, Metop-B is cooler than Metop-A by -0.08K • It is unclear whether this delta is coming from differences in sensors or CRTM Metop-B in MICROS

  14. Night DD’s @12 µm – Hi-Res (Ref=Metop-A GAC) Metop-B: ~-0.08K Aqua & Terra: closer in family after switching from CRTM 2.02 to 2.1 • In Ch 4, Metop-B is cooler than Metop-A by -0.08K • Unclear whether this delta is coming from differences in sensors or CRTM Metop-B in MICROS

  15. SST = Linear Combination of 3 Bands • Night • Now calculated using Metop-A regression coefficients • Biased warm by 0.25K • New Metop-B SST coefficients was updated on Nov.14, using 27/10/2012 to 11/10/2012 Metop-B BTs. SST from NPP/VIIRS

  16. Night DD’s @SST – Low-Res (Ref=Metop-A GAC) Metop-B: ~+0.25K • Metop-B SST is ~+0.25K warmer than Metop-A • Calculated using Metop-A regression coefficients • Will recalculate regression coefficients when have enough match-ups (1 month+) Metop-B in MICROS

  17. Night DD’s @SST – Hi-Res (Ref=Metop-A GAC) Metop-B: ~+0.25K • Metop-B SST is ~+0.25K warmer than Metop-A • Calculated using Metop-A regression coefficients • Will recalculate regression coefficients when have enough match-ups (1 month+) Metop-B in MICROS

  18. Night DD’s @SST – GAC & Hi-Res Metop-B back to family after SST coeff. was updated. • Metop-B SST Coeff. was updated on Nov. 14, and brought it back to family. Metop-B in MICROS

  19. Summary • NRT processing for MetopB was added in MICROS V6 • Data are available in MICROS V6 since Nov. 19, 2012. • MetopB (GAC & FRAC) are stable. • DDs was used to check MetopB consistency with other • Ch 3B is +0.07K warmer than Metop-A • Ch 4 is +0.23K warmer than Metop-A – “out of family” • Ch 5 is -0.08K cooler than Metop-A – “in family” • SST was back in family after SST coeff. was updated on Nov. 14, 2012 Actions • Check with CRTM Team if CRTM coefficients for Metop-A and -B were calculated consistently • If they are, then work with CAL Team to resolve (especially Ch 4) • Work with MCST to resolve Terra-Aqua 3.7 µm 0.3K inconsistency Metop-B in MICROS

More Related