1 / 10

Native and invasive mussels

Native and invasive mussels. Restoration potential and effects on the Neponset River. NepWRA. Native bivalve species present. Elliptio complanata. Pisidium spp. Wikimedia.org. Restoration problems. 83 of 297 species extinct in North America Most imperiled organisms (55% of species)

sachi
Download Presentation

Native and invasive mussels

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Native and invasive mussels Restoration potential and effects on the Neponset River

  2. NepWRA

  3. Native bivalve species present Elliptio complanata Pisidium spp. Wikimedia.org

  4. Restoration problems • 83 of 297 species extinct in North America • Most imperiled organisms (55% of species) • IUCN Red listed • Little funding available (2003 US$24k/sp.) • Sensitive to environment • Habitat degradation • Dams, land use changes siltation, pollution • Hydrologic regime • Flow, temperature • Host specific dispersal • Neponset-specific problems: • Toxic metals • Summer low-flow conditions, high temperature • Low clearance rate • Unlikely to solve eutrophication problem

  5. Williams et al. 1993

  6. Wikimedia.org

  7. Comparison of clearance rates • Native Unionids: • Low Density • 0.006 to 2.327 mussels per m2 • Filtration rate • 1 to 2 l/hr/g AFDM • Total optimal clearance: ~23 l/m2/hr • Invasive Dreissenids: • High Density • 2.5 to 2.6x105 mussels per m2 • Filtration rate • ~5.8 l/hr/g AFDM • Total optimal clearance: ~5500 l/m2/hr

  8. Future residents? D. polymorpha D. Rostriformis bugensis Wikimedia.org

  9. Usgs.gov

  10. References • Ackerman, J.D. 1999. Effect of velocity on the filter feeding of dreissenid mussels (Dreissena polymorpha and Dreissena polymorpha bugensis): implications for trophic dynamics. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatics 56:1551-1561 • Chase, M.E. and R.C. Bailey. 1999. The ecology of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in the Lower Great Lakes of North America: I. Population dynamics and growth. Journal of Great Lakes Research 25(1):107-121 • Crabtree, D.L. and T.A. Smith. 2009. Population attributes of an endangered mussel, Epioblasmatorulosarangiana (Northern Riffleshell), in French Creek and implications for its recovery. Northeastern Naturalist 16(3)339-354 • Kappes, H. and P. Haase. 2012. Slow but steady: the dispersal of freshwater mollusks. Aquatic Sciences 74:1-14 • Layzer, J.B. and E.M. Scott. 2006. Restoration and colonization of freshwater mussels and fish in a southeastern United States tailwater. River Research and Applications 22:475-491 • Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. 11/3/2012. Natural heritage and endangered species program. http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/nhesp.htm Accessed 11/17/2012 • MacIssac, H.J., W.G.Sprules, O.E.Johannsson, J.H. Leach. 1992. Filtering impacts of larval and sessile zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in western Lake Erie. Oecologia 92:30-39 • Nicklin, L. and M.T.Balas. 2007. Correlation between unionid mussel density and EPA habitat assessment parameters. Northeastern Naturalist 14(2):225-234 • Orth, R.J. T.J.B.Carruthers, W.C Dennison, C.M. Duarte, J.W.Fourqurean, K.L. Heck Jr., R. Hughes, G.A.Hendrick, J. Kenworthy, S. Olyarnik, F.T. Short, M. Waycott, S.L. Williams. 2006. A global crises for seagrass ecosystems. BioScience 56(12):987-996 • Pennak, R.W. 1989. Fresh-water Invertebrates of the United States: Protozoa to Mollusca, Third Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York. • Régnier, C, B. Fontaine, P. Bouchet. 2009. Not knowing, not recording, not listing: Numerous unnoticed mollusk extinctions. Conservation Biology 23(5):1214-1221 • Ricciardi, A. and J.B. Rasmussen. 1999. Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 13(5):1220-1222 • Singer, E.E. and M.M. Gangloff. 2011. Effects of a small dam on freshwater mussel growth in an Alabama (U.S.A.) stream. Freshwater Biology 56:1904-1915 • Smith, K., C. Nielsen, P. Downey. 2003. Trio of experts instream habitat assessment: East Branch Neponset watershed. ESS Group, Inc. Wellesley, MA • Sousa, R., J.L. Gutierrez, D.C. Aldridge. 2009. Non-indigenous invasive bivalves as ecosystem engineers. Biological Invasions 11:2367- 2385 • Strayer, D.L. 2006. Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. Journal of the American Benthological Society 25(2):271- 287 • Thorp J.H. and A. P. Covich. 2010. Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, Third Edition. Academic Press- Elsevier, London. • United States Geological Survey. 7/8/2011. NAS-Nonindigenous aquatic species. http://nas.er.usgs.gov/taxgroup/mollusks/zebramussel/. Accessed 11/17/12 • Williams, J.D., M.L. Warren Jr., K.S. Cummings, J.L. Harris, R.J. Neves. 1993. Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18(9):6-22

More Related