- 92 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Solar Sail

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Solar Sail

Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics

AEM 4332W – Spacecraft Design

Spring 2007

Orbit

Eric Blake

Daniel Kaseforth

Lucas Veverka

Eric Blake

Optimal Trajectory of a Solar Sail: Derivation of Feedback Control Laws

- The state of a spacecraft can be described by a vector of 6 orbital elements.
- Semi-major axis, a
- Eccentricity, e
- Inclination, i
- Right ascension of the ascending node, Ω
- Argument of perihelion, ω
- True anomaly, f

- Equivalent to 6 Cartesian position and velocity components.

= Sail Lightness Number

= Gravitational Parameter

By Inspection:

Transversality:

- Iterative methods are needed to calculate co-state boundary conditions.
- Initial guess of the co-states must be close to the true value, otherwise the solution will not converge.
- Difficult
- Alternative: Parameter Optimization.
- For given state boundary conditions, maximize each element of the orbital state by an appropriate feedback law.

= Sail Lightness Number

= Gravitational Parameter

Maximize:

Sail pointing for maximum acceleration in the q direction:

- Example: Use parameter optimization method to derive feedback controller for semi-major axis reduction.
- Equations of motion for a:

Feedback Law:

Use this procedure for all orbital elements

- Initial Conditions: Earth Orbit
- Final Conditions: semi-major axis: 0.48 AU inclination of 60 degrees

Time (years)

- Although the method of patched LSL’s is not ideal, it is a solution that is close to the optimal solution.
- Example: SPI Comparison of LSL’s and Optimal control.

- Continuous thrust problems are common in spacecraft trajectory planning.
- True global optimal solutions are difficult to calculate.
- Local steering laws can be used effectively to provide a transfer time near that of the global solution.

Lucas Veverka

Temperature

Orbit Implementation

Optimal Trajectory of a Solar Sail: Orbit determination and Material properties.

Lucas Veverka

- Reflectivity constant, r, negatively affects the solar radiation pressure force.
- P is the solar pressure as a function of distance.
- A is the sail area being struck by the solar radiation.
- ui is the incident vector.
- n is the vector normal to the sail.

- Emissivity and specular reflection neglected.
- Assumed a Lambertian surface.

- Fsolar is the solar flux.
- αis the absorptance.
- εis the emittance.
- σ is the Stefan-Boltzman constant.
- dsunis the distance from the sun.

- Objective:
- Reach an orbit with semi-major axis of 0.48 AU
- and inclination of 60 degrees as quickly as possible.

- Investigated four possible orbits
- Cold transfer orbit
- Hot transfer orbit
- Inclination first transfer orbit
- Simultaneous orbit

- Advantages:
- Very simple two-stage transfer.
- Goes no closer to sun than necessary to avoid radiation damage.

- Disadvantages:
- Is not the quickest orbit available.

- Order of operations:
- Changes semi-major axis to 0.48 AU.
- Cranks inclination to 60 degrees.

- Time taken:
- 10.1 years.

- Advantages:
- Still simple with three-stages.
- Is a much quicker transfer.

- Disadvantages:
- Radiation is very intense at 0.3 AU.

- Order of operations:
- Changes semi-major axis to 0.3 AU.
- Cranks inclination to 60 degrees.
- Changes semi-major axis to 0.48 AU.

- Time taken:
- 7.45 years.

- Advantages:
- Very simple two-stage transfer.
- Avoids as much radiation damage as possible.

- Disadvantages:
- Takes an extremely long time.

- Order of operations:
- Cranks inclination to 60 degrees.
- Changes semi-major axis to 0.48 AU.

- Time taken:
- 20.15 years.

- Simultaneous transfer is too complicated with little or no real benefit.
- Inclination first transfer takes too long.
- Hot transfer orbit is much quicker but submits materials to too much radiation.
- Cold transfer orbit is slower than the hot but gets the equipment to the desired location safely.
- Choice: Cold transfer orbit!

Daniel Kaseforth

Control Law Inputs and Navigation System

Jon T Braam

Kory Jenkins

Structures Group:

Primary Structural Materials

Design Layout

3-D Model

Graphics

Weight and Volume Constraints

- Delta II : 7400 Series
- Launch into GEO
- 3.0 m Ferring
- Maximum payload mass: 1073 kg
- Maximum payload volume: 22.65 m3

- 2.9 m Ferring
- Maximum payload mass: 1110 kg
- Maximum payload volume: 16.14 m3

- 3.0 m Ferring

Aluminum Alloy Unistrut

- 7075 T6 Aluminum Alloy
- Density
- 2700 kg/m3
- 168.55 lb/ft^3

- Melting Point
- ? Kelvin

- Density

Picture of Unistrut

- Density
- Mechanical Properties
- Allowing unistrut design
- Decreased volume

- Allowing unistrut design
- Thermal Properties
- Capible of taking thermal loads

- Constraints
- Volume
- Service task
- Thermal consideration
- Magnetic consideration
- Vibration
- G loading

- Unistrut Design
- Allowing all inside surfaces to be bonded to
- Titanium hardware

- Organization
- Allowing all the pointing requirements to be met with minimal attitude adjustment

- Allowing all inside surfaces to be bonded to

- Large Picture of expanded module

- Large picture

- Blah blah blah (make something up)

- Kick ass picture

- Kick ass picture

- The blanks will be filled in soon

- Blah blah blah

- Not really any reason but when has that stopped anyone!

Sail Support Structure

Anticipated Loading

Stress Analysis

Materials

Sail Deployment

- Characteristic acceleration is a measure of sail performance.
- Characteristic acceleration increased with sail size.
- Higher acceleration results in shorter transfer time.
- Sail size is limited by launch vehicle size and deployment power requirements.

- Challenge: Design a robust, easy to deploy structure that will maintain sail shape.
- A 150 x 150 meter sail covers the same area as 5 football fields. (22,500 square meters)
- Solution: An inflatable boom structure based on the L’Garde design supports 4 triangular sail quadrants.
- Booms are deployed in pairs to minimize power consumption.

Step 5

Step 1

Deployment cables retract to pull the sail quadrants out of their storage compartments.

Heater: Raises boom temperature above glass transition temperature to 75 C.

To sail quadrant

Step 4

Once deployed, booms cool below glass transition temperature and rigidize.

Step 2

Inflation gas inlet: booms are inflated to 120 KPa for deployment.

To deployment motor

Step 3

Cables attached to stepper motors maintain deployment rate of ~ 3 cm/s.

Solar Pressure

Assumptions:

- Solar Pressure at 0.48 AU = 19.8 µN/m^2.
- Thin wall tube.
- Sail quadrant loading is evenly distributed between 3 attachment points.
- Isotropic material properties.
- Safety factor of 3.

P = 2/3 P_quadrant

Bending

Buckling

Shear

Hoop stress

(inflation pressure)

Section

Modulus

- Expected deployment loads of 20 N in compression dictate boom sizing.
- Booms sized to meet this requirement easily meet other criteria.
- Verified using laminate code that accounts for anisotropy of composite materials.

- Cross-ply carbon fiber laminate.
- IM7 carbon fiber
- TP407 polyurethane matrix, Tg = 55 deg C
- Major Radius = 18 cm, minor radius = 10 cm.
- Length = 106 meters.
Analysis of a Composite Laminate:

- Sail support structure can be reliably deployed and is adequately designed for all anticipated loading conditions.
- Future Work
- Reduce deployment power requirement.
- Reduce weight of support structure.
- Determine optimal sail tension.

Attitude Determination and Control

Brian Miller

Alex Ordway

Alex Ordway60 hours worked

Attitude Control Subsystem Component Selection and Analysis

- Meeting mission pointing requirements
- Meet power requirements
- Meet mass requirements
- Cost
- Miscellaneous Factors

- Sliding Mass vs. Tip Thruster Configuration
- Idea behind sliding mass

- Sliding mass ACS offers
- Low power consumption (24 W)
- Reasonable mass (40 kg)
- Low complexity
- Limitations
- Unknown torque provided until calculations are made
- No roll capability

- Initially decided to use combination of sliding mass and tip thrusters

- ADS
- Goodrich HD1003 Star Tracker primary
- Bradford Aerospace Sun Sensor secondary

- ACS
- Four 10 kg sliding masses primary
- Driven by four Empire Magnetics CYVX-U21 motors

- Three Honeywell HR14 reaction wheels secondary
- Six Bradford Aero micro thrusters secondary
- Dissipate residual momentum after sail release

- Four 10 kg sliding masses primary

- Primary
- Decision to use star tracker
- Accuracy
- Do not need slew rate afforded by other systems

- Goodrich HD1003 star tracker
- 2 arc-sec pitch/yaw accuracy
- 3.85 kg
- 10 W power draw
- -30°C - + 65 °C operational temp. range
- $1M

- Not Chosen: Terma Space HE-5AS star tracker

- Decision to use star tracker

- Secondary
- Two Bradford Aerospace sun sensors
- Backup system; performance not as crucial
- Sensor located on opposite sides of craft
- 0.365 kg each
- 0.2 W each
- -80°C - +90°C

- Two Bradford Aerospace sun sensors

- Sliding mass system
- Why four masses?
- Four Empire Magnetics CYVX-U21 Step Motors
- Cryo/space rated
- 1.5 kg each
- 28 W power draw each
- 200°C
- $55 K each
- 42.4 N-cm torque

- Gear matching- load inertia decreases by the gear ratio squared. Show that this system does not need to be geared.

- Three Honeywell HR14 reaction wheels
- Mission application
- Specifications
- 7.5 kg each
- 66 W power draw each (at full speed)
- -30ºC - +70ºC
- 0.2 N-m torque
- $200K each
- Not selected
- Honeywell HR04
- Bradford Aerospace W18

- Six Bradford micro thrusters
- 0.4 kg each
- 4.5 W power draw each
- -30ºC - + 60ºC
- 2000 N thrust
- Supplied through N2 tank

- Conclusion
- Robust ADCS
- Meets and exceeds mission requirements
- Marriage of simplicity and effectiveness
- Redundancies against the unexpected

- Robust ADCS

Brian Miller

Tip Thrusters vs. Slidnig Mass

Attitude Control Simulation

- Conducted trade between tip thrusters and sliding mass as primary ACS
- Considerations
- Power required
- Torque produced
- Weight
- Misc. Factors

- Tip Thrusters (spt-50)
- Pros
- High Torque Produced ~ 1.83 N-m
- Low weight ~ 0.8 kg/thruster

- Cons
- Large Power Requirement ~ 310 Watts
- Lifetime of 2000 hrs
- Requires a fuel, either a solid or gas

- Pros

- Attitude Control System Characteristics
- Rotational Rate
- Transfer Time
- Required Torque
- Accuracy
- Disturbance compensation

- Requirements
- Orbit
- Make rotation rate as fast as possible
- Roll spacecraft as inclination changes

- Communications
- Within Maximum Torque
- Pitch and Yaw Axis
~ 0.34 N-m

- Roll Axis
~ 0.2 N-m

- Pitch and Yaw Axis

- Orbit

m – sliding mass

F – solar force

z – distance from cg

M – spacecraft mass

Pitch and Yaw Axis

Rotation Rate = 0.144 rad/hr

~ 8.25 deg.

Transfer Time = 5300s ~ 1.47 hrs

Required Torque = 0.32 N-m

~ 98.8% of maximum produced

Converges to desired angle

Torque Req.

Transfer Time

Slope = 0.00004 rad/s

Roll Axis

Rotation Rate = 0.072 rad/hr

~ 4.12 deg

Transfer Time = 7000s ~ 1.94 hrs

Required Torque = 0.15 N-m

~ 75% of maximum produced

Converges to desired angle

Torque Req.

Transfer Time

Slope = 0.00002 rad/s

Power, Thermal and Communications

Raymond Haremza

Michael HitiCasey Shockman

Raymond Haremza

Thermal Analysis

Solar Intensity and Thermal Environment

Film material

Thermal Properties of Spacecraft Parts

Analysis of Payload Module

Future Work

Thermal Analysis and Design

-Raymond Haremza

By taking longer to get to 0.48 AU, we in turn reduce the amount of design, analysis, production time and weight.

The Carbon-Carbon Radiator has aluminum honeycomb sandwiched between it, and has thermal characteristics, Ky= Kx=230W/mK, and through the thickness Kz = 30W/mK which allows the craft to spread its heat to the cold side of the spacecraft, but also keeping the heat flux to the electric parts to a minimum.

Material Properties

Setting the heat fluxes together yields the surface temperature of the object based on emmissivity, absorbitivity, size and geometry of the object.

Notes: By using thermodynamics the amount of heat needed to be dissipated from the component taking into account its heat generation, shape, size, etcetera. If the component is found to be within its operating range, the analysis is done, if not a new thermal control must be added or changed.

Using the heat generated (10W), and using common coating material ( ); the required to maintain the star tracker’s temperature to 30 K can be found by.

Knowing the heat needed to dissipate, a radiator size can be calculated, or other thermal control methods (MLI) can be used to maintain temperature.

Using the amount of heat needed to be radiated from star tracker, the additional area required to dissipate heat can be calculated and chosen.

Notes: Since Microthrusters need to be within 247 to 333 K, will have to add MLI to stay within thermal constraints.

Analysis of Multilayer insulation…

Need to radiate heat away from solar sail, any ideas, stephanie, group?

- Communications

Michael Hiti

Power

- Stephanie Thomas
- Professor Joseph Mueller
- Professor Jeff Hammer
- Dr. Williams Garrard
- Kit Ru….
- ?? Who else??