1 / 51

Van Buren Intermediate School District Physical Education Program Grant

Van Buren Intermediate School District Physical Education Program Grant. Impacting the lives of the residents of Van Buren County through the pursuit of healthy, active lifestyles. Session Overview. Making the Case for Physical Activity Obesity Diabetes Health Care Costs

rubenr
Download Presentation

Van Buren Intermediate School District Physical Education Program Grant

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Van Buren Intermediate School District Physical Education ProgramGrant Impacting the lives of the residents of Van Buren County through the pursuit of healthy, active lifestyles

  2. Session Overview Making the Case for Physical Activity Obesity Diabetes Health Care Costs Potential Solutions Van Buren Intermediate School District PEP Grant Local Physical Education Program Highlights

  3. Making the Case

  4. Making the Case

  5. Making the Case National Activity Trends of Adolescents

  6. Making the Case

  7. Obesity Trends Among U.S. Adults between 1985 and 2004 • Definitions: • Obesity: having a very high amount of body fat in relation to lean body mass, or Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or higher. • Body Mass Index (BMI): a measure of an adult’s weight in relation to his or her height, specifically the adult’s weight in kilograms divided by the square of his or her height in meters.

  8. No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1985 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  9. No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1986 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  10. No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1987 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  11. No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1988 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  12. No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1989 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  13. No Data <10% 10%–14% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1990 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  14. No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1991 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  15. No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1992 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  16. No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1993 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  17. No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1994 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  18. No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1995 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  19. No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1996 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  20. No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20 Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1997 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  21. No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20 Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1998 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  22. No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20 Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 1999 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  23. No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% ≥20 Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2000 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person)

  24. Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2001 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person) No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%

  25. Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2002 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person) (*BMI 30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’4” person) No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%

  26. Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2003 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person) No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%

  27. Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS, 2004 (*BMI ≥30, or ~ 30 lbs overweight for 5’ 4” person) No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%

  28. 1991 Obesity Trends* Among U.S. AdultsBRFSS,1991, 1996, 2004 (*BMI 30, or about 30 lbs overweight for 5’4” person) 1996 2004 No Data <10% 10%–14% 15%–19% 20%–24% ≥25%

  29. Potential Solutions #1: Everyone Take Personal Responsibility for Lifestyle Choices #2: Provide Quality Physical Education Programs

  30. Quality Physical Education • Provision of developmentally appropriate experiences that allow students to develop physical skills, knowledge and personal social attributes facilitating the pursuit of active, healthy lifestyles.

  31. Van Buren Intermediate School DistrictCarol M. White Physical Education Program Improvement Grant

  32. Mission Positively impact the lives of the children and residents of VB County through the provision of an effective physical activity program

  33. Funding/Impact • United States Department of Education • Three Year Grant • $727,000.00 • 12 School Districts • 55 Teachers • 17,750 School Children

  34. Personnel • Project Director Dr. Dan Pratley, VB Foundation • Project Coordinator Krystin Martens, Doctoral Assistant • Project Consultant Dr. Deb Berkey, WMU • Project Evaluator Dr. Larry Blackmer, VB Foundation • Project Technology Support • Sam Accorso--- VB Technology Center • Richard Johnson– VB Technology Center • Steering Committee • VBISD Physical Educators

  35. Project Collaborators • Van Buren Foundation • VBISD • WMU • 12 School Districts in VB County • U.S. Department of Education

  36. Grant Goals and Activities • 1-Increase physical fitness/activity levels of residents of VB county • FitnessGram Assessment (Fitness Assessment) • Pedometers (Tracking progress) • Heart Rate Monitors (Pacing and tracking progress) • Provide School-based Programs • Provide Community-based Programs

  37. Grant Goals and Activities • 2-Develop a countrywide model curriculum (Part 1) • Best practice • Infusion of technology (Computers, websites) • Reporting practices (Progress Reports) • Model curriculum that reflects NASPE and MDE Standard • Develop a Web-site for curriculum materials

  38. Grant Goals and Activities • 2-Develop a countywide model curriculum (Part 2) • Prepare students to pursue healthy lifestyles • Provision of developmentally appropriate instruction focusing on: • Physical skill development • Fitness skills • Knowledge (physical activity, nutrition, lifestyle choices) • Personal-Social skills

  39. Grant Goals and Activities • 3- Improve nutrition behaviors/habits of school children and their families residing in Van Buren County. • Study current status (Nutrition Survey) • Develop intervention strategies • Infuse nutrition concepts into curriculum • Offer school and community programs

  40. Grant Goals and Activities • 4- Improve the effectiveness of physical educators in Van Buren County. • Professional Development (New Skills) • Collaboration with Western Michigan University Physical Education Teacher Preparation Program (Supervision) • Summer Institute (Curriculum Revision)

  41. Grant Oversight • Van Buren Intermediate School District • Local School Boards • Grant Personnel • Steering Committee

  42. Steering Committee Roles • District Ambassadors • Program Direction/Communication • Monthly meetings • Direct Line Consultants • Representatives • Teachers • Principals • VB Foundation • WMU

  43. 2005-2006 Progress Report • Assessment of physical fitness levels using FitnessGram (2-4-6-8-9th grade) • Trained teachers to use protocols • Trained teachers to record results • Introduced/Infused Technology for Teachers • Laptops • Printers • Wireless Access • Assessment of nutrition status (4-6-8-9th grade)

  44. 2005-2006 Activities • Assessed current curriculum • Planned and implement one awareness program in each district (In progress) • Planned and delivered a school board presentation • Stage a three day “summer institute” for teachers

More Related