Selection
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 98

Selection PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 77 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Selection. Dan Graur. Conditions for maintaining Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium: 1. random mating 2. no migration 3. no mutation 4. no selection 5.infinite population size. 2 mathematical approaches to studying genetic changes in populations: Deterministic models Stochastic models.

Download Presentation

Selection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Selection

Selection

Dan Graur


Selection

Conditions for maintaining Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium:

1. random mating

2. no migration

3. no mutation

4. no selection

5.infinite population size


Selection

2 mathematical approaches to studying genetic changes in populations:

Deterministic models

Stochastic models


Selection

Deterministic models assume that changes in allele frequencies from generation to generation occur in a unique manner and can be unambiguouslypredicted from knowledge of initial conditions.

Strictly speaking, this approach applies only when: (1) the population is infinite in size, and (2) the environment either remains constant with time or changes according to deterministic rules.


Selection

Stochastic models assume that changes in allele frequencies occur in a probabilistic manner, i.e., from knowledge of the conditions in one generation one cannot predict unambiguously the allele frequencies in the next generation, but can only determine the probabilities with which certain allele frequencies are likely to be attained.


Selection

Stochastic models are preferable to deterministic ones, since they are based on more realistic assumptions.

However, deterministic models are easier mathematically and, under certain circumstances, they yield sufficiently accurate insights.


Selection

Selection

The deterministic approach


Selection

Natural selection

The differential reproduction of genetically distinct individuals (genotypes) within a population.

Differential reproduction is caused by differences among individuals in such traits as (1) mortality, (2) fertility (offspring), (3) fecundity (gametes), (4) mating success, and (5) viability ofoffspring.


Selection

Is the fitness of slim men higher than that of fat men?

?

Dixson et al. 2003. Masculine somatotype and hirsuteness as determinants of sexual attractiveness to women. Archives of Sexual Behavior 32:29–39.


Selection

Non-Genetic

Genetic

Variability


Selection

Arashnia levana

Non-genetic variability.


Selection

Helix aspersa

Genetic variability.


Selection

Non-Genetic

Genetic

Fitness-related

Fitness-unrelated

Variability


Selection

Genetic? No

Fitness related? Yes

Hair color

Does selection operate?


Selection

Sperm morphology

Genetic? Yes

Fitness related? Yes

Does selection operate?


Selection

Genetic?

Fitness related?

Wealth

Does selection operate?


Selection

Darwinian selection requires variation.

Lamarkian selection does not require variation.


Selection

Natural selection is predicated on the availability of genetic variation among individuals in characters related to reproductive success (variation in fitness).


Selection

Synonymous and nonsynonymous genetic variability.


Selection

Evolutionary Success

Ryan Kremer

Carlos Slim Helú

(richest person on earth)

6 children

Linus Pauling

(Only person to win 2 unshared Nobel prizes)

4 children


Selection

The fitness(w) of a genotype is a measure of the individual’s ability to survive and reproduce.

The size of a population is constrained by the carrying capacity of the environment.

Thus, an individual’s evolutionary success is determined not by its absolute fitness, but by its relative fitness in comparison to the other genotypes in the population.


Selection

Finite Niche (Carrying) Capacity


Selection

In nature, the fitness of a genotype is not expected to remain constant for all generations and under all conditions. However, by assigning a constant value of fitness to each genotype, we are able to formulate simple models, which are useful for understanding the dynamics of change in the genetic structure of a population brought about by natural selection.


Selection

For simplicity:

  • We assume that fitness is determined solely by the genetic makeup.

  • We assume that all loci contribute independently to fitness (i.e., the different loci do not interact with one another in a manner that affects fitness), so that each locus can be dealt with separately.


Selection

A very simple model (1):

One locus = A

Two alleles = A1 & A2

The old allele =A1

The new allele is =A2

Three genotypes = A1A1, A1A2 & A2A2

Each genotype has a typical fitness (w)

We are interested in the fate ofA2


Selection

A very simple model (2):

The fitness of the old genotype (A1A1)is set at 1.

The relative fitnesses of the two new possible genotypes (A1A2 & A2A2) are defined comparatively as 1 + s or 1 + t, where s and t are the selection coefficients.


Selection

In comparison with A1, A2 may deleterious, neutral, or advantageous, and it will be subject to purifying selection, no selection, or positive Darwinian selection, respectively.


Selection

Genotype A1A1 A1A2A2A2

Fitness w11w12w22

Frequency p2 2pqq2


Selection

Change inA2allele frequency per generation


Selection

These are the variables we fiddle with

Genotype A1A1 A1A2A2A2

Fitness w11w12w22

Frequency p2 2pqq2


Selection

Dominance & Recessiveness

At the phenotypic level

At the fitness level


Selection

A1 dominance

Genotype A1A1 A1A2A2A2

Fitness w11w11 w22

Frequency p2 2pqq2


Selection

A1 dominance

GenotypeA1A1A1A2A2A2

Fitness11 1 + s

A2


Selection

A2 dominance

Genotype A1A1 A1A2A2A2

Fitness w11w22 w22

Frequency p2 2pqq2


Selection

A2 dominance

codominance

GenotypeA1A1A1A2A2A2

Fitness11 + s 1 + s

A2


Selection

Codominance (genic selection)

Genotype A1A1 A1A2A2A2

Fitness w11 (w11 + w22)/2 w22

Frequency p2 2pqq2


Selection

codominance

GenotypeA1A1A1A2A2A2

Fitness11 + s 1 + 2s

A2


Selection

Directional Selection

codominance

A2 dominance

A1 dominance

A1 = old mutant

A2 = new mutant


Selection

Selection intensities


Selection

Initial Frequencies


Selection

Industrial

Melanism


Selection

A2


Selection

Selection against recessive lethal alleles

b-hexosaminidase A is a dimeric lysosomal protein consisting of two a-subunits. It is encoded by a gene on chromosome 15.


Selection

Selection against recessive lethal alleles

b-hexosaminidase-A catalyzes the removal of N-acetylgalactosamine from GM2 ganglioside, thereby degrading and removing it from the nervous system.


Selection

Absence of b-hexosaminidase-A

 Accumulation of GM2 ganglioside in neurons.


Selection

Selection against recessive lethal alleles

Tay-Sachs disease results from a defect in the HEXA gene encoding the a subunit of b-hexosaminidase A.

Warren Tay (1843-1927)

Bernard Sachs (1858-1944)


Selection

Tay-Sachs is a recessive… allele


Selection

Tay-Sachs is a recessive & lethal alleles

Symptoms of classical Tay-Sachs disease first appear at 4 to 6 months of age when an apparently healthy baby gradually stops smiling, crawling or turning over, loses its ability to grasp or reach out and, eventually, becomes blind, paralyzed and unaware of its surroundings. Death occurs by age 3-5.

Cherry-red spot from an infant with Tay-Sachs disease.


Selection

Selection against recessive lethal alleles


Selection

Inefficiency of selection against recessive allele


Selection

It is difficult to rid a population of recessive alleles, because they hide behind the back of dominant alleles, and are not exposed to selection.

If q = 50%, then 50% of all recessive

alleles are in heterozygous state.

If q = 10%, then 98% of all recessive

alleles are in heterozygous state.

If q = 1%, then 99.98% of all recessive alleles are in heterozygous state.


Selection

Selection against dominant lethal alleles

Dr. George Sumner Huntington

1850-1916

Protein: huntingtin

Gene: 180 Kb (chromosome 4)

Exons: 67

Amino acids: 3,141

Mode: autosomal dominant


Selection

Selection against dominant lethal alleles


Selection

It should be easy to rid a population of dominant alleles, because all of them are exposed to selection at all frequencies.

So why are

there dominant

lethal diseases?


Selection

  • Recurrent mutations.

  • Late age of onset.

  • Variable expressivity.

  • Incomplete penetrance.


Selection

Balancing Selection


Selection

Overdominance

Genotype A1A1 A1A2A2A2

Fitness w11w12 > w11,w22w22

Frequency p2 2pqq2


Selection

Underdominance

Genotype A1A1 A1A2A2A2

Fitness w11w12 < w11,w22w22

Frequency p2 2pqq2


Selection

The change in the frequency of A2 from generation to generation is:


Selection

At equilibrium, i.e., when ∆q = 0.


Selection

stable

unstable

overdominance

underdominance

s = 0.04 and t = 0.02

s = - 0.02 and t = - 0.01


Selection

Overdominant selection is inherently inefficient, even if the two homozygotes are not viable.

RIP

Powderpuff

Chinese Crested


Selection

The peculiar case of sickle-cell anemia


Selection

Glutamic acid

Valine


Selection

mvhltpeeksavtalwgkvn

vdevggealgrllvvypwtq

rffesfgdlstpdavmgnpk

vkahgkkvlgafsdglahld

nlkgtfatlselhcdklhvd

penfrllgnvlvcvlahhfg

keftppvqaayqkvvagvan

alahkyh 147aa


Selection

mvhltpveksavtalwgkvn

vdevggealgrllvvypwtq

rffesfgdlstpdavmgnpk

vkahgkkvlgafsdglahld

nlkgtfatlselhcdklhvd

penfrllgnvlvcvlahhfg

keftppvqaayqkvvagvan

alahkyh 147aa


Selection

IntuitiveModel

normal fitness

somewhat reduced fitness

reduced fitness


Selection

In theory, the end result should have been directional selection — a drastic reduction in HS allele frequency in the population.


Selection

Worldwide distribution of sickle-cell anemia


Selection

In practice, the frequency of the HS allele may reach enormous values in some populations.

>20%


Selection

Plasmodium falciparum


Selection

An evolutionary “experiment”: Slave trade


Selection

West Africa Frequency= >20%

Curaçau

no malaria

HS frequency = 5%

Surinam

endemic malaria

HS frequency = 20%

300 years = 10-15 generations


Selection

  • With malaria in the background, heterozygotes have a huge advantage over the wild type homozygotes.

  • In the absence of malaria, the heterozygotes have a slight disadvantage in comparison to wild type homozygotes.

  • The fitness of the HsHs homozygotes is not affected by the presence or absence of malaria.


Selection

Modiano D, Luoni G, Sirima BS, Simpore J, Verra F, Konate A, Rastrelli E, Olivieri A, Calissano C, Paganotti GM, D'Urbano L, Sanou I, Sawadogo A, Modiano G, Coluzzi M. 2001. Haemoglobin C protects against clinical Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature 414:305-308.


Selection

E to V = HS

E to K = HC

Hemoglobin C

codon

position

6!

Glutamic acid

Lysine


Selection

“…in the long term and in the absence of malaria control, HbC would replace HbS in central West Africa.”


Selection

The peculiar case of Rh-blood groups


Selection

Underdominant selection?

Why does Rh– still exist?


Selection

A summary:

Selection may lead to changes in allele frequencies over time.

A mere change in allele frequencies from generation to generation does not necessarily indicate that selection is at work.

A lack of change in allele frequencies does not necessarily indicate that selection is absent.


Selection

Selection is a very

important evolutionary

force.

At least, in principle…


  • Login