Shoulder instability in patients with eds
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 42

SHOULDER INSTABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH EDS PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 67 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

EDNF 2012 CONFERENCE LIVING WITH EDS. SHOULDER INSTABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH EDS. Keith Kenter, MD Associate Professor Sports Medicine & Shoulder Reconstruction Director, Orthopaedic Residency Program Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Cincinnati. DISCLOSURE.

Download Presentation

SHOULDER INSTABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH EDS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Shoulder instability in patients with eds

EDNF 2012 CONFERENCE

LIVING WITH EDS

SHOULDER INSTABILITY INPATIENTS WITH EDS

Keith Kenter, MD

Associate Professor

Sports Medicine & Shoulder Reconstruction

Director, Orthopaedic Residency Program

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery

University of Cincinnati


Disclosure

DISCLOSURE

KEITH KENTER

I HAVE NOTHING TO DISCLOSE AND NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST AS IT RELATES TO THIS PRESENTATION

INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT

NIH (RESEARCH)

SMITH & NEPHEW (EDUCATION GRANT)

JOURNAL REVIEWER/EDITORIAL BOARDS

JBJS, AJSM, BJSM


Individualized treatment

INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT

Single Dislocation

Recurrent Instability


Definitions

DEFINITIONS

LAXITY

Range of motion of the center of the humeral head with respect to the glenoid fossa due to a external force

INSTABILITY

Symptomatic inability to maintain the humeral head in the glenoid fossa


Definitions1

DEFINITIONS

SUBLUXATION

  • Partial dislocation

  • Incomplete separation of joint

    DISLOCATION

    Frank separation of joint


Classification

CLASSIFICATION

DIRECTIONAL

  • Anterior

  • Posterior

  • Multidirectional


Classification1

CLASSIFICATION

MECHANISMS

  • TUBS - Traumatic Unidirectional Bankart Surgery

  • AMBRI – AtraumaticMultidirectional Bilateral Rehabilitation Inferior shift


Glenohumeral instability

GLENOHUMERAL INSTABILITY

Complex interaction between physiologic laxity to provide range of motion and joint stability.

STABILITY

MOBILITY

EDS


The eds shoulder

THE EDS SHOULDER

INCREASED LAXITY

HIGHER RISKS FOR INSTABILITY

(MDI)


Anatomic considerations

ANATOMIC CONSIDERATIONS

CONSTRAINTS

  • Passive

  • Static

  • Dynamic


Passive constraints

PASSIVE CONSTRAINTS

BONY ANATOMY

  • Humeral head

  • Glenoid fossa


Passive constraints1

PASSIVE CONSTRAINTS

INTRA-ARTICULAR PHYSICS

  • Negative pressure

  • Joint fluid cohesion


Passive constraints2

PASSIVE CONSTRAINTS

LABRUM

Fibrocartilagenous lip that increases glenoid depth and increases humeral contact area

  • 75% superoinferior

  • 50% anteroposterior

ClinOrthop243; 1989


Static constraints

STATIC CONSTRAINTS

  • Capsular envelope

  • Glenohumeral ligaments


Glenohumeral ligaments

GLENOHUMERAL LIGAMENTS

  • SUPERIOR- restraint for inferiortranslation in adducted shoulder

  • MIDDLE- restraint for anteriortranslation in 45º abducted shoulder

  • INFERIOR- restraint for anterior andinferior translation in abducted shoulder


Glenohumeral ligaments1

GLENOHUMERAL LIGAMENTS

MGHL

SGHL

IGHL


Dynamic constraints

DYNAMIC CONSTRAINTS

  • Rotator cuff group

  • Biceps tendon

  • Scapular rotators


Biomechanics

ANTERIOR TRANSLATION

FLEXION

‘CROSS BODY’ MOTION

POSTERIOR TRANSLATION

EXTENSION

EXTERNAL ROTATION

BIOMECHANICS

HARRYMAN

JBJS 72A; 1990


Biomechanics1

BIOMECHANICS

KENTER

Anterior Tightening

Abduction

Forward Flexion

ER

No Translation

ASES; 1999


Treatment

TREATMENT

  • Immediate reduction of the dislocated shoulder

  • Physical therapy program

    Rotator Cuff strengthening

    Scapular stabilizer strengthening

  • Surgical intervention


Eds shoulder instability

EDS SHOULDER INSTABILITY

  • Patient education and defining the collagen disorder are paramount

  • Modification on activity and work on mechanics

  • Core strength, spine posture, RC strength, and scapular muscle strength

  • Surgical results about 30% recurrence in patients without anatomic lesions


Rehabilitation

REHABILITATION


Rehabilitation1

REHABILITATION


Rehabilitation2

REHABILITATION


Rehabilitation3

REHABILITATION


Multi directional instability

MULTI-DIRECTIONAL INSTABILITY

MISAMORE

  • 64 patients ave 16 year (9-30) at 8 years

    • 43 female / 21 male

  • PT program with RC and parascapular strengthening

  • 57 patients available at follow-up

    • 63% (36/57) without surgery

    • Pain – 23 good-excellent

    • Instability – 17 good-excellent

  • Poor response:

    • (unilateral/ADLs/hyperlaxity/3months)

  • JSES 14; 2005


    Surgical management

    SURGICAL MANAGEMENT

    • WHEN TO OPERATE

    • HOW TO DO IT

      Open

      Arthroscopic

    ADDRESS THE PATHOANATOMY


    Anterior dislocation

    ANTERIOR DISLOCATION

    NATURAL HISTORY

    • Age related

      • < 22 years – 60-90%

      • 30-40 years – 50-65%

        > 50 years – RC Tears

        60+ years about 40%

  • Pathology related

    • < 25 years up to 85% with Bankart labral tear

  • JBJS 88A; 2006

    JBJS 89A; 2007


    So what

    SO WHAT ??

    DOES RECURRENCE CAUSE DAMAGE

    HABERMEYER

    76 patients with anterior dislocations evaluated with arthroscopy

    • 9 with 1 dislocationLabrum

    • 12 with 1- 2 dislocationsLigament

    • 23 with 3-5 dislocationsDouble ligament

    • 32 with 6+ dislocationsArticular cartilage

    JSES 8; 1999


    Cartilage breakdown

    CARTILAGE BREAKDOWN

    FIRST TIME DISLOCATION


    Arthroscopic advances

    ARTHROSCOPIC ADVANCES

    • Rapid evolution in techniques

    • Early techniques secure labrum to bone

    • Address capsular laxity

      Capsular shift

      Capsular split

      Capsular plication

      Thermal ‘shrinkage’


    Arthroscopic techniques

    ARTHROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES

    • PRO

      Visualize all pathology

      Less stiffness

      Easier to revise

    • CON

      Less reliable/technically demanding

      Higher failure rates (some authors)

      Portal scars


    Surgical technique

    SURGICAL TECHNIQUE


    Surgical technique1

    SURGICAL TECHNIQUE


    Surgical technique2

    SURGICAL TECHNIQUE


    Surgical technique3

    SURGICAL TECHNIQUE


    Surgical technique4

    SURGICAL TECHNIQUE


    Arthroscopic techniques1

    ARTHROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES

    CONTRAINDICATIONS

    • Capsular deficiency

    • Glenoid bone loss

    • Humeral head defect

    • Collision athlete ?

    • Surgeon’s skill level


    Capsular plication

    CAPSULAR PLICATION


    Thermal

    THERMAL

    • Addresses residual laxity

    • Repair labrum first

    • Avoid suture line

    • Paint in grid fashion

    DO NOT RECOMMEND


    Summary

    SUMMARY

    • Complex interaction between stability and mobility.

    • Neuromuscular training and strengthening program for the shoulder girdle is paramount esp in MDI.

    • Surgical emphasis is to restore anatomy and capsular tension.

    • Arthroscopic challenge today is reproducibility of quantifying amount of capsular redundancy during repair.


    Shoulder instability in patients with eds

    THANK YOU


  • Login