1 / 13

EDF expectations regarding Interoperability tests

EDF expectations regarding Interoperability tests. Eric LAMBERT EDF R&D Charlotte CIMUg 2009. Topics. EDF experience with IOP tests & lessons learned Needs based on actual CIM EDF Group related projects ERDF (EDF Distribution Subsidiary) CIM roadmap and CIM roadmap for 61968

rosalyn-morrow
Download Presentation

EDF expectations regarding Interoperability tests

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EDF expectations regarding Interoperability tests Eric LAMBERTEDF R&DCharlotteCIMUg 2009

  2. Topics • EDF experience with IOP tests & lessons learned • Needs based on actual CIM EDF Group related projects • ERDF (EDF Distribution Subsidiary) CIM roadmap and CIM roadmap for 61968 • Conclusion : IOP tests needs for EDF Group TSO/DSO EDF R&D

  3. EDF experience with IOP tests • EDF R&D participated in IOP tests 2004, 2005, 2006 • Understanding what was an IOP test (CPSM) • Promoting new needs through networks modelized in CIM CIM for UCTE network (anticipation for European TSOs) CIM for Distribution need (anticipation for CDPSM profile) • Participating implied to provide software with CIM APIs • EDF R&D participated in IOP tests 2009 for TSO needs in Europe • EDF R&D provided converters from old UCTE format to the new CIM profile that TSOs in Europe defined through UCTE and IEC Task force EDF R&D

  4. EDF lessons learned & needs • Time consuming effort : it has a non negligeable cost • Tools used recently have facilitated the process : hopefully these tools were mostly free of use • An IOP test must be defined according to a Standard partIt’s the only proof to demonstrate that the standard is implementedand usefulThat’s aligned with wg14 roadmap : an IOP test for each 61968 part • No networks clearly identified that could be re-used consistently through IOP tests These should be clearly identified and managed through IOP tests • IOP tests must be planned in advance with scope, objectives and participants. Based on this we can schedule them and dedicate resources to them. Stakeholders have to be identified clearly. EDF R&D

  5. Interface Reference Model Status Part 1 : Architecture & general requirements Part 2 : Glossary NO Network Operations AM Asset Management OP Operationnal Planning & Optimisation MC Maintenance & construction EMS Energy Management RET Retail SC Supply Chain Interface part 3 Interface part 4 Interface part 5 Interface part 6 Interface part 10 Interface part 10 Interface part 10 IEC 61968 compliant middleware services Interface part 7 Interface part 8 Interface part 9 Interface part 10 Interface part 10 Interface part 10 Interface part 10 NE Network Extension planning CS Customer Support MR Meter Reading ACT Customer Account Management FIN Financial PRM Premises HR Human Resources Part 13 : CDPSM Part 11 : CIM for DMS International Standard ISMaintenance Proposal Not started EDF R&D

  6. CIM roadmap for eRDF (1/2) • The first phase of the roadmap identifies the following tasks : • “ Synchronize the distribution network descriptions ” • This phase identifies the exchange between the GIS managing eRDF assets, the remote control system and the future AMM system. • “ Populate and use a quality repository ” • Sharing quality data in a same format. • “ Populate and use a Measurement repository ” • Sharing load and generation data in a same format. EDF R&D

  7. CIM roadmap for eRDF (2/2) • The second phase of the roadmap identifies the following tasks : • “ Reinforce computer assisted maintenance project ” • “ Dematerialize documents exchanged between remote control system, operation, maintenance ” • “ Reinforce the asset life cycle ” • Equipments tracability EDF R&D

  8. IEC WG14 ROADMAP (1/2) • 2009 Interoperability tests on 61968-9 (FDIS) (CIM Interfaces for Metering) postponed to January 2010 => EDF R&D will participate Interoperability tests on 61968-13 (IS) (Common Distribution Power System Model) december 2009 => EDF R&D will participate CIM Model for Distribution (61968-11) (CDV) Will be reinforced based on 61968-13 TF discussions EDF R&D

  9. IEC WG14 ROADMAP (2/2) • 2010 Maintenance cycle on « Interfaces for Network Operation » (61968-3) review IS and plan IOP tests Maintenance cycle on « Interfaces for Asset Management » (61968-4) review IS and plan IOP tests EDF R&D

  10. The CIM roadmap continuation • SOLFEGE R&D project : generalize CIM-eRDF usage for eRDF operational projects. Work planning AMM 2010 MV/LV extension planning tools Generating CIMforDistribution61968-11 MSITE model growing Power quality 2009 Synchronization Maintenance management LV network MV network modelling Today EDF R&D

  11. Managing CIM-eRDF/CIM versions Today CIM model versions next CIM version 14 Official CIM version 13 Have to consider and anticipate the next version (14) 12 MV network description GIS and SCADA exchanges LV network description Maintenance Power quality AMM 11 GIS and calculation codes exchanges 10 MSITE model versions 1.0 1.1 2.0 2.1 2.2 before MSITE… EDF R&D

  12. Conclusion : IOP tests needs for EDF • TSO level : CIM/ENTSO-E harmonisation for the Market in Europe • DSO level : • CDPSM profile (61968-13) • Metering interfaces (61968-9) • GIS to DMS interfaces (61968-3, 61968-4) • Interfaces to planning tools (61968-7) • Interfaces to Work Management systems (61968-6) • Don’t forget : Some IOP tests can concern TSO AND DSO needs !For instance : planning tools • CIM & 61850 Interoperability tests must exist based on CIM/61850 Models and derived profiles EDF R&D

  13. Thanks for your attention !Eric EDF R&D

More Related