1 / 42

Statistics of the CMB

Statistics of the CMB. From Boltzmann equation of photons to power spectra 2-point statistics on the sphere: ML, quadratic estimators, polarisation-specifics. Outline of the lectures. Boltzmann equation of CMB. FLAT SCLICING GAUGE. NEWTONIAN GAUGE. Homogeneous solution.

rosaline
Download Presentation

Statistics of the CMB

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Statistics of the CMB • From Boltzmann equation of photons to power spectra • 2-point statistics on the sphere: ML, quadratic estimators, polarisation-specifics Outline of the lectures

  2. Boltzmann equation of CMB FLAT SCLICING GAUGE NEWTONIAN GAUGE Homogeneous solution Perturbed metric reads Perturbed photon energy-momentum

  3. Boltzmann equation of photons Geodesic parametrization Geodesic equation of particles (interacting gravitationally only) Unperturbed ======== background Homogeneous evolution

  4. Perturbed Boltzmann equation Geodesic equation for the energy, in perturbed metric Boltzmann equation for perturbed distribution, in perturbed background Collisional cross-section is frequency independent: can integrate over frequency: STF TENSORS

  5. SVT, STF, Spherical harmonics… Vector field: potential plus solenoidal: STF tensor of rank 2: Generalization: Fourier space, with k=e3 NORMAL MODES

  6. Thomson scattering term (temperature) COLLISION TERM THOMSON PHASE FUNCTION Energy as seen by observer comoving with baryons/photons fluid

  7. Gauge-invariant phase-space density perturbation Gauge-invariant Boltzmann equation reads (Newtonian gauge)

  8. Temperature hierarchy, scalar modes Monopole is unaffected by scattering Forward photons are scattered away Baryon-photon drag Anisotropic pressure USING THE FOLLOWING GRAVITY THOMSON SCATTERING TRANSPORT

  9. Boltzmann hierarchy, tensor modes

  10. Einstein and conservation equations Scalar modes, Einstein equations Constraint equations (Poisson) Evolution equations Scalar modes, conservation equations Energy Momentum (Euler) Tensor modes, Einstein equation

  11. DO YOU (REALLY) THINK THIS IS IT ?? NOT YET…. POLARISATION OK, I’ll make it soft !

  12. Polarisation • Due to quadrupolar anisotropy in the electron rest frame • Linked to velocity field gradients at recombination

  13. E and B modes of polarisation Scalar quantity Pseudo-scalar quantity Scalar perturbations cannot produce B modes B modes are model-independent tracers of tensor perturbations

  14. Normal modes are gauge-invariant (Stewart-Walker lemma) As for temperature, we have normal modes for polarisation Temperature and polarisation get decomposed on these modes

  15. Boltzmann equation for Stokes Q,U Redefining SIMPLE, ISN’T IT ? Stokes parameters are absent in unperturbed background Their evolution does not couple to metric perturbations at linear order

  16. Polarized scattering term  SCATTERING GEOMETRY

  17. Boltzmann polarization hierarchy ONLY E-MODES COUPLE TO TEMPERATURE QUADRUPOLE SCALARS DO NOT PRODUCE B MODES As for the temperature case, express gradient term in terms of spherical harmonics Using the following recurrence formula:

  18. Normal modes and integral solutions Interpretation State of definite total angular momentum results in a weighted sum of SOURCE DEPENDANCE PLANE WAVE MODULATION Using recurrence relations of spherical Bessels: Develop the plane wave into radial modes

  19. Normal modes and integral solutions Linear dependance in the primordial perturbations amplitudes These normal modes are the solutions of the equations of free-streaming !! (Boltzmann equation without gravity and collisions) • Line-of-sight integration codes • Sources depend on monopole, dipole and quadrupole only

  20. CMB power spectra Wayne Hu

  21. CMB imaging: scanning experiments Time-response of the instrument (detector + electronics) Simplified linear model (pixelized sky) EM filters band-pass Detector noise Angular response: beam and scanning strategy BICEP focal plane Spider web bolometer Archeops, Kiruna

  22. Imagers: map-making Huge linear system to solve: use iterative methods (PCG) + FFTs BAYES theorem Linear data model Uniform signal prior Sufficient statistics Covariance matrix of the map

  23. Imagers: power spectrum Signal covariance matrix BAYES again… Marginalize over the map TO BE MAXIMIZED WITH RESPECT TO POWER SPECTRUM

  24. Imagers: power spectrum (cont.) PSEUDO-NEWTON (FISHER) Second order Taylor expansion For each iteration and each band, Npix3 operation scaling !!

  25. Imagers: too many pixels ! Quite ugly at first sight !!  New (fast) analysis methods needed • Fast harmonic transforms • Heuristically weighted maps

  26. Imagers (cont.) Power spectrum expectation value …simplifies, after summation over angles (m):

  27. Imagers: “Master” method Finite sky coverage  loss of spectral resolution  need to regularize inversion Spectral binning of the kernel Unbiased estimator MC estimation of covariance matrix of PS estimates Works also for polarization (easier regularization on correlation function)

  28. Imagers: polarised map-making One polarised detector (i) Let us consider n measurements of the same pixel, indexed by their angle  ML solution

  29. Polarisation: optimal configurations General expression of the covariance matrix Assume uncorrelated and equal variance measurements, look for optimal configuration of angles : • Stokes parameters errors are uncorrelated • Covariance determinant is minimized

  30. Imagers: polarised spectrum estimation Stokes parameter in the great circle basis

  31. Polarisation: correlation functions Polynomials in cos(): integrate exactly with Gauss-Legendre quadrature

  32. Polarisation: (fast) CF estimators for m=n=2 involves Using with Weighted polarization field Using We get Heuristic weighting (wP,wT): Normalization: correlation function of the weights

  33. Polarisation: (fast) CF and PS estimators Define the pseudo-Cls estimates: These can be computed using fast SPH transforms in O(npix3/2) (compare to o(npix3) scaling of ML…) If CF measured at all angles: integrate with GL quadrature Assuming parity invariance

  34. Polarisation: CF estimators on finite surveys Results in E/B modes leakage Incomplete measurement of correlation function: apodizing function f(): Normalization of the window functions

  35. Polarisation: E/B coupling of cut-sky Leakage window functions (not normalized) Recovered BB spectra (dots) No correlation function information over max=20±

  36. Polarisation: E/B coupling of cut-sky No correlation function over Gaussian apodization Leakage window functions (not normalized) Recovered BB spectra (dots)

  37. Polarisation: E/B leakage correction Define: Then: We have obtained pure E and B spectra (in the mean) As a function of +

  38. Quadratic estimators: covariances RAPPELS Edge-corrected estimators covariances in terms of pseudo-Cls covariances As long as Mll’ is invertible, same information content in edge-corrected Cls and pseudo-Cls

  39. Pseudo-Cls estimators: cosmic variance Forget noise for the moment, consider signal only: Case of high ells and/or almost full sky If simple weighting (zeros and ones)

  40. The case of interferometers CBI – Atacama desert

  41. Interferometers: data model Visibilities: sample the convolved UV space: Relationship between (Q,U) and (E,B) in UV (flat) space Idem for Q and U Stokes parameters RL and LR baselines give (Q§iU) Visibilities correlation matrix UV coverage of a single pointing of CBI (10 freq. bands) ( Pearson et al. 2003)

  42. Pixelisation in UV/pixel space • Redundant measurements in UV-space • Possibility to compress the data ~w/o loss Use in conjonction with an ML estimator Newton-like iterative maximisation Least squares solution • Hobson and Maisinger 2002 • Myers et al. 2003 • Park et al. 2003 Fisher matrix For an NGP pointing matrix: Covariance derivatives for one visibility Resultant noise matrix

More Related