1 / 35

A CASE FOR LEVERAGING THE ONLINE GRADE BOOK

A CASE FOR LEVERAGING THE ONLINE GRADE BOOK. John Fritz, Tim Hardy & Karin Readel University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) February 15, 2011. OVERVIEW. Introductions, Stage Setting (John) Highlight: ECAR study of Undergraduates and IT, desire for profs to use grade book.

romanaa
Download Presentation

A CASE FOR LEVERAGING THE ONLINE GRADE BOOK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A CASE FOR LEVERAGING THE ONLINE GRADE BOOK John Fritz, Tim Hardy & Karin Readel University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC) February 15, 2011

  2. OVERVIEW • Introductions, Stage Setting (John) • Highlight: ECAR study of Undergraduates and IT, desire for profs to use grade book. • UMBC’s Alternate Delivery Program (Karin) • Effective Practice: Adaptive Release • Walking the “Self Interest” Talk in ECON 122 (Tim) • Highlight: How course design influences student performance • Wrap Up, Q & A

  3. About UMBC • Founded in 1966 • “Research extensive university” Carnegie classification • Fall 2009 Stats • 12,870 Students • 9,947 undergrad, 2,923grad • 730 Faculty • 480 FT, 250 PT • Selected Brags • #1 “Up and Coming National University” U.S. News America’s Best Colleges2010 & 2009 • 1st in undergrad chemistry degrees awarded to African Americans • One of 50 Best Colleges for Women • 7-time National College Chess Champions

  4. About Blackboard @ UMBC • Blackboard Learn 9.1 • As of Spring 2010 (began using in SP2000) • 95% of all students • 75% of all instructors • 65% of all courses (1,645 FA2010) • 356 Communities • Includes all student, faculty and staff senates • Support Staff: • 2 FTE (Admin & Support) • 1 Server Admin

  5. WHAT STUDENTS WANT FROM A CMS?

  6. CURRENT PRACTICE @ UMBC • Blackboard Courses with active grade books • 49 percent (FA2010) • 48 percent (SP2010) • 47 percent (FA2009) • Source: www.umbc.edu/blackboard/reports • Why don’t more faculty use the grade book? • What could happen if they did?

  7. UMBC'S HYBRID WORKSHOP & ADP

  8. Program Goals • Provide realistic outlook on what it will take to convert course to hybrid format • Provide assistance with available technology • Provide opportunity for feedback from peers • Create network of “hybrid” faculty for support and feedback

  9. SHIFTING RESPONSIBILITY FOR LEARNING

  10. ADAPTIVE RELEASE • Create rules governing access to material • ADP uses this in work with faculty to facilitate self-directed learning and demonstrate the approach. • Syllabus or AI quiz before students can access assignments or turn in any work for credit). • One of three “Effective Practices” emphasized during Hybrid Workshop and ADP.

  11. TIM HARDY & ECON122

  12. WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO TODAY? • Background • Final Exam • “My” Hybrid Way • The Keys • The Results • My Opinion • What’s Next

  13. BACKGROUND • Economics Department • ECON 122 – Accounting Principles II • Required for five or six majors • Approximately 500 students per year • Three or four folks teach the course – all part time faculty • Common final – department prepared • Final exam grades are shared • Results???

  14. FINAL EXAM • Same exam for all students • Fifty questions • Two hours • All multiple choice • Students MUST score at least 50% on the final exam or all other work is for naught. • Department policy

  15. “MY” HYBRID WAY • Tell ‘em what you’re gonna tell ‘em. • Tell ‘em • Tell ‘em what you just told ‘em.

  16. “MY” HYBRID WAY • Read the chapter • Consider EOC questions • “Watch” the video – one per LO • Take an on-line quiz on the LO • “Watch” the next LO video • Take the next on-line quiz for the LO • Repeat ‘til finished. • The student can’t see LO2 ‘til they’ve successfully completed LO1.

  17. “MY” HYBRID WAY • When all LOs are complete, take an on-line conceptual quiz – this is the first activity that “counts”. 30 minute time limit, one attempt only. • Then do the homework problems – again, on-line. • The class meets and we address any questions about the homework.

  18. “MY” HYBRID WAY • They take an “on-line” quiz on the problems just discussed. They are exactly the same problems just discussed, EXCEPT, each student has different values/numbers to use. • 60 minute time limit, one attempt only.

  19. “MY” HYBRID WAY • Tests • Four tests • 25 questions each • 1 hour time limit – strictly enforced • All multiple choice • End of semester • Mock final exam – with key • A few minutes on “how” to take the final exam

  20. THE KEYS • Small chunks. LO videos less than 10 minutes, less than 7 minutes is better. • Adaptive Release on BlackBoard. A student can’t see the next activity ‘til they’ve successfully completed the current activity. • Overlay Adaptive Release with Date/Time “open” and Date/Time “closed”.

  21. ADAPTIVE RELEASE

  22. THE KEYS • Report results on BlackBoard – Grade Center/My Grades • Very FAST feedback on each of the four tests. They know their results within an hour. The key is posted on BlackBoard. • Keep a close eye on your email. • Put a “step by step” on BlackBoard in Announcements/”Start Here” when you “open” the class.

  23. THE KEYS • Alert students about BlackBoard “Certified” operating system/browser combinations. Don’t be their “tech support”. • TEST, TEST, TEST, TEST, TEST, TEST, TEST your site BEFORE the semester starts. • TEST it as a student! You’ll have to get a student login to BB. • Make nothing so valuable that it is fatal.

  24. THE KEYS • Syllabus quiz • Advice to Students. • Do all the parts and pieces • Keep up • Ask if you have a question

  25. THE RESULTS • All but one of my F2F students have successfully passed the departmental final exam – PROVIDED they “did all the parts”. • Best success rate in the department. • All Hybrid (and online) students have successfully passed the departmental final exam – PROVIDED they “did all the parts”.

  26. THE RESULTS • Fall 2009 departmental results. • My section was “hybrid” • All other sections were F2F (other instructors) • All students took the same exam. • My students, on average, did about 20% better on the final exam than the F2F students. • I was delighted. • So were they.

  27. THE RESULTS – CONTINUED • Spring 2010 and Fall 2010 departmental exam results. • While the “gap” narrowed, “hybrid” delivery still produced the best results. • Summer 2010 • Course was offered for the first time completely “on-line”, though it did require an “in-person” final exam. • Better final exam average score results than “hybrid”.

  28. THE RESULTS – CONTINUED • Winter 2010 and Winter 2011 • “Hybrid” delivery in a three week “mini-mester” • All who “did what was asked” succeeded. • Winter 2011 average final exam scores were the best ever recorded.

  29. MY OPINION • I was quite nervous on my maiden voyage. • ‘Tis “more comfy” now. • It worked!!! • Yup, I like it.

  30. WRAP UP

  31. BB ACTIVITY BY GRADE DISTRIBUTION

  32. BB ACTIVITY OF D & F STUDENTS • Based on voluntary participation by instructors in 131 courses, students earning a D or F tend to use Bb 39 percent less than students earning higher grades. • SP2010 21 courses | 37 percent less • FA2009 29 courses | 37 percent less • SP2009 11 courses | 47 percent less • FA2008 13 courses | 40 percent less • SU2007 7 courses | 33 percent less • SP2008 26 courses | 32 percent less • FA2007 15 courses | 36 percent less • Does the pattern hold true during the semester? • What if students knew this information sooner? NEW: iStrategy analysis of 1,461 SP2010 courses shows D&F students used Bb 47% less than students earning C or higher.

  33. MYUMBC CHECK MY ACTIVITY (CMA)

  34. www.umbc.edu/blackboard/reports

  35. THANKS fritz@umbc.edu thardy@umbc.edu readel@umbc.edu

More Related