1 / 12

EUCOM FY10 / 11 JETP Requirements/Impacts

EUCOM FY10 / 11 JETP Requirements/Impacts. Mr. Thomas Hill. FY10 JETP Shortfall. Requirement: $49.3M JS Allocation: $35.9M ($13.4M shortfall) Planning Target: $40M* Planning Shortfall: $9.3M $4.1M for PAC-3 funded by CCIF

rock
Download Presentation

EUCOM FY10 / 11 JETP Requirements/Impacts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EUCOM FY10 / 11 JETP Requirements/Impacts Mr. Thomas Hill

  2. FY10 JETP Shortfall • Requirement: $49.3M • JS Allocation: $35.9M ($13.4M shortfall) • Planning Target: $40M* • Planning Shortfall: $9.3M • $4.1M for PAC-3 funded by CCIF • * Planning Target: To prevent under-spending, historically plan ~10% over allocation due to canx’s & ability to get EOY $

  3. Planning Assumptions • EUCOM leadership approved plan 15 July 09 • Prevents waste of similarly constrained SIF/CE2 funds • Manages expectations/prevents unfunded commitments • No discretional monies currently available from JS • Further cuts possible • Unprogrammed growth borne by OCE desiring growth

  4. Recommendation Planning Target: $40M or less Allocation: $35.9M • $39.8M program • 1 cancellation; 18 streamlined Streamlined Exercises Recommended Cancellation

  5. Potential Impacts • Potential risk to exercise program: • Significant • $4M in risk to maximize engagement • Relies on EOY monies/cancellations • 4th Qtr exercises at risk: • JACKAL STONE, MEDCEUR, COMBINED ENDEAVOR, NORTHERN VIKING, TORGAU, BOLD AVENGER • Sealift drives earlier CCD • Reduced flexibility/compressed JELC cycle • Increased political and financial risk • Impact to SAS & event objectives/readiness/BPC: • Minimal Moderate • Only one event cancelled • Limits STRATLIFT for ERC/HA/HCA projects

  6. USEUCOM Strategic Objectives • 1 - USEUCOM forces transformed and expeditionary, trained and ready for global deployment, and prepared to execute joint/multinational operations and training. • 2 - NATO capable and willing to conduct out-of-area operations. • 3 - European partner nations and organizations work with USEUCOM to actively solve common problems. • 4 - Partner nations have capacity to provide own security and sustain regional stability. • 5 - Protection of Allies, Partners, and U.S. interests assured. • 6 - Basing and access support strategic freedom of action and security cooperation activities. • 7 - Russia acts as a responsible partner with the U.S., our Allies, and partners. • 8 - Local crises prevented from becoming regional conflicts Strategy for Active Security – 4 Jun 08

  7. 2009 USEUCOM JMETL • ST 1: Deploy, Concentrate, and Maneuver Theater Forces (ECJ3) • ST 2: Conduct Theater Strategic Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance(ECJ2) • ST 4: Sustain Theater Forces (ECJ4) • ST 5: Provide Theater Strategic Command and Control, Communications, and Computers (C4)(ECJ6) • ST 5.4: Provide Strategic Direction to Theater Forces (ECJ5/8) • ST 6: Force Protection (ECJ3) • ST 6.6: Perform Mission Assurance (ECJ3) • ST 8: Develop and Maintain Alliance and Regional Relations (ECJ5) • ST 8.4.2: Combat Terrorism (ECJ3) • ST 8.5: Integrate Military Operations With Regional Interagency Activities (CIEG) • ST 9: Coordinate Counterproliferation in Theater (ECJ5)

  8. Impacts (cont.) • JUNIPER COBRA: 12 hr ops • ISR prefers 24 hour battle rhythm • Strategic Objective (SO) 4; JMETS ST 3/5/6/6.6/8/9 • REGIONAL RESPONSE: no growth • Limits scope/complexity—no training of Mobile BN enablers (EN, NBC) • Potentially delays AZE NATO OCC Level II • CCP; SO 3/4/5; JMET ST 8 • Limits HA/HCA engagement • CCP; SO 3/4; JMET ST 8

  9. Impacts (cont.) • NOBLE SHIRLEY: • 1 of 2 two FAST PLTs receive CT/FTX Training • Decreased readiness • SO 3/4; JMETS ST 8/8.4.2 • IMMEDIATE RESPONSE: SEABEE Det cancelled • Reduced HA/HCA/ERC support • SO 4/5/6/8; JMET ST 8 • ANATOLIAN FALCON • Costing assumes EUCOM forces; add’l $1.7M from CONUS • SO 1/3/4/6; JMETS ST 1/4/5/8

  10. Impacts (cont.) • AUSTERE CHALLENGE: Reduced from $5.5 to $3.5M • Smaller JECG/White Cell/JTFs • Potentially limits JTF training and diminished readiness • SO 1/3; JMETS ST 1/2/4/5/5.4/8.5 • RAPID TRIDENT: No BN level and EN, NBC training • Limited support to NATO OCC Level I and II • CCP; SO 2/4/5/7; JMETS ST 8 • TORGAU: CPX only (placeholder) • SO 6/7; JMET ST 8

  11. EUCOM FY 11 JETP Requirements

  12. EUCOM Training Conferences –The Way Ahead FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 ETSC (Dec 09) ETPC (Jun 10) • Joint Training Schedule • Event Specifications (5 W’s) • Forecast Budget Data • Link to SAS & CCP • Dates: 8 – 11 Dec 09 • Review & Validate FY11 • Create Plan for FY12 • ETSC - EUCOM Training Synchronization Conference (December) • ETPC - EUCOM Training Planning Conference (June)

More Related