1 / 14

Accountability Feedback Survey Results

Accountability Feedback Survey Results. Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education December 18, 2018. Background. Survey sent to Superintendents, principals and various stakeholder organizations in the state

rob
Download Presentation

Accountability Feedback Survey Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Accountability Feedback Survey Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education December 18, 2018

  2. Background • Survey sent to Superintendents, principals and various stakeholder organizations in the state • Open from October 29th to November 16th (reminder sent November 12th) • 439 responses with at least one question answered beyond name • “Choice” type questions had a much higher response rate than open-ended suggestions • Small majority of respondents reported as being “Satisfied” or “Very Satisfied” with the new accountability system

  3. Who responded to the survey? *Included MASC, MCPSA and MBAE

  4. How well did respondents understand the system?

  5. How satisfied were respondents with the new system?

  6. How did understanding impact satisfaction?

  7. How valuable is the normative component (school percentile)?

  8. How valuable is the criterion-referenced component (target percentage)?

  9. How valuable were different components of the system?

  10. How should indicators in non-high schools be weighted?

  11. How should indicators in high schools be weighted?

  12. What additional indicators should be included for non-HS? • Only 130 responses to this open question • Most frequent response was some variation of “None” (52) • Others mentioned included: • School climate/student feedback • Access to the arts • Educator attendance • Suspension • School spending • K-2 Accountability

  13. What additional indicators should be included for high school? • Only 130 responses to this open question • Many of the same as non-HS • Additional ideas mentioned included: • Broader definition of advanced coursework • Postsecondary enrollment • Extra-curricular participation • 9th grade success

  14. What else is on your mind? • Last question on survey was open for respondents to tell us anything about the new system. • Some more common themes: • N-size issues in small schools and participation • Chronic absenteeism is out of our control (excused absences) • Use of standardized testing • High-performing districts are penalized • Need consistency…we keep changing system • State funding for accountability

More Related