1 / 14

Similarities, Differences and Emerging Trends in Higher Education Ranking Criteria

Similarities, Differences and Emerging Trends in Higher Education Ranking Criteria. Using Interpretive Research for the Process Analysis of Critical Evaluation. Authors: Prof. Dr. Mujahid Ali Department of Commerce, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan Asif Yaseen

rio
Download Presentation

Similarities, Differences and Emerging Trends in Higher Education Ranking Criteria

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Similarities, Differences and Emerging Trends in Higher Education Ranking Criteria Using Interpretive Research for the Process Analysis of Critical Evaluation Authors: Prof. Dr. Mujahid Ali Department of Commerce, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan Asif Yaseen The Royal Institute of Technology, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden Saif Ullah Qureshi Department of Commerce, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan

  2. OUTLINE • Purpose • Why we need ranking systems • Methodology • Theoretical Framework • Critical Evaluation • Conclusion & Implications for Ideal ranking System

  3. Purpose • Address and assess the specific context of different ranking systems by examining the different dimensions and their empirical outlook. • It is also necessary to make critical examination of best known practices prevalent in the world

  4. Why we need ranking systems? • standardized way to establish comparability • Interest of stakeholders • Students, Parents, Employers, Funding Bodies • Increased competition • Better Performance of Institutions • Quality of Education & Research

  5. Research Methodology • Research is based on Inductive Approach • Well known University ranking systems are critically evaluated • A single question is used to propose a system for current and future university education needs

  6. Theoretical Framework Following ranking systems are critically evaluated • Times Higher Education Survey • Shanghai Jiao Tong World University Ranking • HEC Pakistan University Ranking Criteria • OIC Ranking System

  7. Times Higher Education Survey

  8. The Shanghai Jaio Tong System

  9. Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) Ranking

  10. Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan

  11. Similarities Index

  12. Ideal Ranking System • Objective Measurement • Research Quality • Funds Generation • Growth Rate in Research • International Orientation • Employer Review • Studenthood in terms of university environment

  13. Thank you very much for your attention

More Related