1 / 19

Repaving the Road: Addressing the Challenges of Conducting Outcome Research in Primary Care

Session #G5b Saturday, October 18, 2014. Repaving the Road: Addressing the Challenges of Conducting Outcome Research in Primary Care. Stacy Ogbeide, PsyD , MS David Bauman, PsyD Bridget Beachy , PsyD. Collaborative Family Healthcare Association 16 th Annual Conference

Download Presentation

Repaving the Road: Addressing the Challenges of Conducting Outcome Research in Primary Care

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Session #G5b Saturday, October 18, 2014 Repaving the Road: Addressing the Challenges of Conducting Outcome Research in Primary Care Stacy Ogbeide, PsyD, MS David Bauman, PsyD Bridget Beachy, PsyD Collaborative Family Healthcare Association 16th Annual Conference October 16-18, 2014 Washington, DC U.S.A.

  2. Faculty Disclosure • We have not had any relevant financial relationships during the past 12 months.

  3. Learning Objectives • 1) At the end of the presentation, participants will understand the importance to conducting and disseminating research in primary care settings; • 2) At the end of the presentation, participants will understand the challenges that occur with conducting research in primary care as well as ways to address the barriers associated with the research process; and • 3) At the end of the presentation, participants will gain knowledge in the types of research designs that can be appropriate for primary care

  4. References • Davis, M., Balasubramanian, B. A., Waller, E., Miller, B. F., Green, L. A., & Coben, D. J. (2013). Integrating behavioral and physical health care in the real world: Early lessons from advancing care together. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 26(5), 588-602. • Goodie, J. L., Kanzler, K. E., Hunter, C. L., Glotfelter, M. A., & Bodart, J. J. (2013). Ethical and effectiveness considerations with primary care behavioral health research in the medical home. Families, Systems, & Health, 31(1), 86-95. doi: 10.1037/a0031852 • Peek, C. J., Cohen, D. J., deGruy, F. V. (2014). Research and evaluation in the transformation of primary care. American Psychologist, 69(4), 430-442. doi: 10.1037/a0036223 • Ray-Sannerud, B. N., Dolan, D. C., Morrow, C. E., Corso, K. E., Kanzler, K. E., Corso, M. L. ... Bryan, C. J., (2012). Longitudinal outcomes after brief behavioral health intervention in an integrated primary care clinic. Families, Systems, & Health, 30(1), 60-71. doi: 10.1037/a0027029 • Sarris, J., Glick, R., Hoenders, R., Duffy, J., & Lake, J. (2013). Integrative mental healthcare White Paper: Establishing a new paradigm through research, education, and clinical guidelines. Advances in Integrative Medicine, 1-8.

  5. Learning Assessment • A question and answer period will be conducted at the end of this presentation.

  6. Presentation Objectives • Introduction • Barriers and challenges • Current strategies and recommendations • Creating flexible research protocols • Disseminating research

  7. Introduction Cartoon from www.stus.com

  8. Introduction • Data on integrated primary care behavioral health (PCBH) models • There is research! • Clinical Indicators • E.g., UDS • High acuity patients • One important aspect of BHC in PCBH model – impact on patient’s overall functioning Ray-Sannerud et al., 2012

  9. Introduction • Time! • Who will help? • Manpower? • Buy-in? • What research needs to be done? Goodie, Kanzler, Hunter, Glotfelter, & Bodart, 2013

  10. Our experience in integrated research • Outcome research • Anxiety • Weight management • HTN • Protocols for integrating BHCs • Integration is intuitive. That alone does not equate with improved patient outcomes

  11. Barriers and Challenges • Confounds • Use of medications concurrently with behavioral strategies • Comorbid pathologies – mental and physical • External vs internal validity • Real world settings • Recruitment • Organizational buy-in • Number of visits • Protocol 1-3 visits, mode patient visit is 1 • What about the participants coming to 1 visit? • Short term vs long term outcomes • How to randomize while still staying true to model? • Rigidity vs flexibility • If rigid, how it is feasible? If flexible, fidelity? Davis et al., 2013

  12. An impossible task? • Biomedical approach vs contextual approach • “Cause and effect” in physical world vs psychological • “Broken, needs fixed” vs learning to be aware and accepting of pain that comes in life while engaging in value-congruent behavior • Measures, how to quantify? • Weight loss, less anxiety, more energy = success? • AAQ? Robinson, Gould, & Strosahl, 2010; Sarris et al., 2013

  13. “Trident” Approach to Integrated Research ClinicalInterventions Assisting PCPs Training/Teaching Holistic Health

  14. Recommended strategies • Have EMRs? USE IT! • Standardizing quality of life measure and tracking in EMR • Ability to measure long-term impact • Measures • Brief • Concern specific AND quality of life • Process measures (may be most important) • Need buy in from organization • Takes a tribe to complete research in PC • Clear workflow for PCPs, MAs, office administration, etc. • As close to regular workflow as possible • All three prongs of the Trident

  15. Flexible research protocols • Uniqueness of operating in integrated context • Focus on specific concern (e.g., HTN) with goal of improving overall functioning • Psychoeducation important • Components vs. standard procedures • Adapting SMH evidence based protocols • Flexible in approach while maintaining philosophy • Need for process measures • Transdiagnostic • MI, ACT, 5 A’s • If we cannot apply the protocol to other concerns, what is the point? • 15 – 30 minute visits • Keep track of time spent, GREAT DATA • Change the way we evaluate success

  16. Disseminating Your Work • Sustainability! • Organizations outside of psychology • American Academy of Family Physicians • Society of Teachers of Family Medicine • State/County Organizations • Practice-Based Research Network (PBRN) • Collaborative Care Research Network (CCRN) • Regional Networks as well Peek, Cohen, & deGruy, 2014

  17. Disseminating Your Work • http://pbrn.ahrq.gov/funding-opportunities/ahrq-pbrn-centers-primary-care-practice-based-research-and-learning

  18. Questions? • Contact: • Stacy Ogbeide: stacy.ogbeide@gmail.com • David Bauman: davidbauman4@gmail.com • BridgetBeachy: bridget.beachy@gmail.com

  19. Session Evaluation Please complete and return theevaluation form to the classroom monitor before leaving this session. Thank you!

More Related