1 / 30

Monotherapy for the polysensitized patient

Monotherapy for the polysensitized patient. Noel Rodriguez-Perez, MD Professor of pediatrics State University of Tamaulipas, Mexico. Monotherapy for the polysensitized patient. Objectives To review the evidence for efficacy of immunotherapy with the more prevalent single allergen.

Download Presentation

Monotherapy for the polysensitized patient

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Monotherapy for the polysensitized patient • Noel Rodriguez-Perez, MD • Professor of pediatrics • State University of Tamaulipas, Mexico

  2. Monotherapy for the polysensitized patient • Objectives • To review the evidence for efficacy of immunotherapy with the more prevalent single allergen. • To highlight the importance of dosing and optimal concentration for efficacy.

  3. Prevalence of sensitization by testing 9 allergens 45.4 % 51.9 % 28.8 % 36.4 % 39.6 % 41.2 % 33 % 41.4% 37.2 % 29.7 % 22.6 % 49.1 % 21.4 % Whole population: 35.6% /11 355 subjects were sensitized Bousquet PJ. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007 37: 780-7.

  4. Prevalences of positive SPT to 10 allergens in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys III • NHANES III • 10,508 subjects tested to 10 allergens between 1988-1994 • 54.3% + SPT to 1 or more allergens • 15.5% + SPT to a single allergen • 38.8% + SPT to 2 or more allergens • Mean 3.5, median 3 • HDM (28%), Perennial rye (27%), Short ragweed (26%), Cockroach (26%), Bermuda grass (18%) Percentage (%) Number of sensitizations Arbes SJ. J Allergy ClinImmunol 2005; 116: 377-383

  5. Sensitization patterns to allergens in Childhood • Retrospective analysis of all sIgE tests in children 0–18 yrs • 9044 children tested. The ImmunoCap. sIgE ≥0.35 kU/l. • 60.1% were not sensitized • 39.9% were sensitized to 1 or more allergens: • 31.1% + sIgE to a single allergen • 47.4% + sIgE to 2 to 4 allergens • 21.5% + sIgE to 5 or more allergens % within age group Age (years) de Jong AB. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2011; 22: 166-71

  6. Clinical characteristics of polysensitized patients • Characteristics of polysensitized patients wit AR. The POLISMAIL study (Italy) • 418 subjects, age 3.5–65 years • 52.6% had AR and 47.4 had AR and asthma. • 90% of patients were polysensitized (3.6 allergns) • Polysensitized patients had more severe symptoms Number of cases of AR or AR + Asthma Ciprandi G. Eur Ann Allergy ClinImmunol 2008; 40: 77-83. Number of sensitizations • Aeroallergen sensitization in asthmatics • SPT to 1338 subjects 12-65 YoA. with asthma • 95% were sensitized to 1 or more allergens • 14% + sIgE to a single allergen • 81% + sIgE to 3 or more allergens • Average of +SPT 5 allergens Mean number of positive skin tests Craig TJ. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008; 121: 671-7 Age group

  7. The average allergic patient is polysensitized

  8. Canonica GW. WAO Journal 2009; 2: 233-281.

  9. Is specific immunotherapy with single allergen effective in polysensitized patients?

  10. Sublingual immunotherapy

  11. Response to sublingual immunotherapy with grass pollen extract: Monotherapy versus combination in a multiallergenextract • Methods • Single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with SLIT. • After an observational grass season, SLIT was administered for 10 months to 54 patients randomized to 1 of 3 arms: • Placebo • Timothy extract (19 μg Phl p 5/day) as monotherapy • Same dose of Timothy extract plus 9 additional pollen extracts. • Outcomes included: Symptom and medication scores, titrated nasal challenges, titrated skin prick tests, sIgE, IgG4 and INF-g. Amar SM. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 124: 150-156

  12. Response to sublingual immunotherapy with grass pollen extract: Monotherapy versus combination in a multiallergenextract Titrated nasal challenge *  Log10 Dose (BAU/mL) t Skin Prick Tests ** *  Log10 Dose (BAU/mL) Monotherapy Timothy Multiallergen IT Placebo Amar SM. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 124: 150-156

  13. Response to sublingual immunotherapy with grass pollen extract: Monotherapy versus combination in a multiallergenextract Timothy specific IgG4 *  Log10 IgG4 (µcg/mL) Monotherapy Timothy Multiallergen IT Placebo Amar SM. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009; 124: 150-156

  14. Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy with house dust mite extract in polyallergen sensitized patients with allergic rhinitis • Objective • To compare the efficacy of SLIT with standardized HDM extract in monosensitized and polysensitized patients with allergic rhinitis. • Methods • This study was a prospective case series conducted at a tertiary referral center. • Patients with allergic rhinitis sensitized only to HDM were compared with patients sensitized to HDM and other unrelated allergens after 1 year of SLIT with house dust mite extract. • Medication scores (AMS) and total nasal symptoms score (TNSS), including rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal obstruction, and itchy nose, were evaluated before and 1 year after SLIT. Lee JE. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011; 107: 79–84.

  15. Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy with house dust mite extract in polyallergen sensitized patients with allergic rhinitis Allergic symptoms in the monosensitized group Allergic symptoms in the polysensitized group p < 0.001 p < 0.001 Symptoms scores Symptoms scores Lee JE. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011; 107: 79–84.

  16. Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy with house dust mite extract in polyallergen sensitized patients with allergic rhinitis Comparison of changes symptoms score and medication score between the 2 groups. Total nasal symptom score (TNSS) Antiallergic medication score (AMS) Lee JE. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2011; 107: 79–84.

  17. Sublingual immunotherapy in polysensitized patients: effect on quality of life • Methods • 167 polysensitized patients with allergic rhinitis were prospectively evaluated • QOL was measured in all cases with the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire at baseline and after 1 year of SLIT • The mean number of sensitizations per patient was 3.65 • SLIT using one extract was given to 123 patients (73.6%), with 2 extracts to 31 patients (18.6%), and with more than 2 extracts to 13 patients (7.8%) Ciprandi G. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2010; 20: 274-9.

  18. Sublingual immunotherapy in polysensitized patients: effect on quality of life Changes in health-related quality of life scores before and after sublingual immunotherapy * * * * * * * Mean Scores Ciprandi G. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2010; 20: 274-9.

  19. Radulovic S. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8;(12):CD002893.

  20. Optimal dose, efficacy, and safety of once-daily SLIT with a 5 –grass pollen tablet for seasonal allergic rhinitis • Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study • 628 adults with grass pollen ARC received 1 of 3 doses of a standardized 5–grass pollen extract, or placebo, administered sublingually using a once-daily tablet formulation • The treatment was initiated 4 months before the estimated pollen season and continued throughout the season • Outcomes: ARC Total Symptom Score,(6 most common symptoms), rescue medication use, quality of life, and safety Didier A. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 120: 1338-45.

  21. Long-term clinical efficacy in grass pollen–induced RC after treatment with SQ-standardized grass allergy immunotherapy tablet • A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial • 257 Adults with a history of moderate-to-severe grass pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis inadequately controlled by symptomatic medications were included. • Efficacy end points were rhinoconjunctivitis symptom and medication scores, quality of life, and percentages of symptom and medication free days. Durham SR. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;125:131-38.

  22. Injective immunotherapy

  23. Grass pollen immunotherapy as an effectivetherapy for childhood seasonal allergic asthma Details of subjects • A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy of grass pollen SIT over 2 pollen seasons was performed. • Children (3-16 years) with a history of seasonal allergic asthma sensitized to grass pollen (P pratense) and requiring at least 200 μg of inhaled beclomethasone equivalent per day were enrolled. • The primary outcome measure was a combined asthma symptom-medication score during the second pollen season. • Secondary outcome measures included end-point titration skin prick testing and conjunctival and bronchial provocation testing to allergen, sputum eosinophilia, exhaled nitric oxide, and adverse events. Mild symptoms had only a minimal effect on daily life, moderate symptoms were defined as having a significant effect on at least 50% of days, and severe symptoms have a major effect on life with daily symptoms. Subjects only had mild symptoms on exposure to tree pollen or house dust mite. Roberts G. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;117:263-8.

  24. Grass pollen immunotherapy as an effectivetherapy for childhood seasonal allergic asthma Change in cutaneous allergen reactivity Grass pollen counts and symptom-medication scores for the second summer Change in conjunctival allergen reactivity Asthma symptom-medication scores Change in bronchial allergen reactivity Roberts G. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;117:263-8.

  25. Efficacy and safety of specific immunotherapy with SQ allergen extract in treatment-resistant seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis Peak season • Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial • 410 subjects with seasonal ARC were randomized: • 203 to 100,000 SQ-U (20mcg Phl p5) • 104 to 10,000 SQ-U (2mcg Phl p5) • 103 to placebo • 347(85%) completed treatment. Pollen Grains/m3 week Symptoms • 276 / 347 (78%) subjects were polysensitized • The polysensitized group showed a similar degree of improvement in symptoms, medication use, RQLQ, and VAS scores compared with the whole study group. • Both active doses were effective, but 100,000 SQ-U was more effective than 10,000 SQ-U Score Frew A. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117: 319-25.

  26. Functional rather than immunoreactive levels of IgG(4) correlate closely with clinical response to grass pollen immunotherapy Combined symptom and medication scores during the pollen season • This is an 8-month dose-response randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study • 221 polysensitized subjects with severe seasonal rhinitis received Alutard SQ, Phleum pratense 100,000 SQ-U, 10,000 SQ-U or placebo injections. • Serum specimens were collected before treatment, after up-dosing, during the peak season and at the end of the study. • Allergen-specific IgG(4) titres and IgG-associated inhibitory activity were evaluated. Shamji MH. Allergy 2011; DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02745.x.

  27. Functional rather than immunoreactive levels of IgG(4) correlate closely with clinical response to grass pollen immunotherapy Time course and dose dependency of SC grass pollen immunotherapy–induced changes in allergen-specific IgG4 antibodies and serum inhibitory activities. Phleum pratense-specific IgG4 antibody levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Serum inhibitory activity was measured by (B) IgE-FAB assay Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy is associated with increases in Phleum pratense-specific IgE antibodies and blunting of seasonal increases in IgE antibodies. ADVIA Centaur automated analyser measurement of IgE levels that included a ‘no-wash’ step to measure IgE-blocking factor. Shamji MH. Allergy 2011; DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02745.x.

  28. Immunotherapy: The Meta-Analyses. What have we Learned? Calderon MA, Boyle RJ, Penagos M, Sheik A. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2011;31(2):159-73, vii.

  29. Th17 Th1 Th2 T cell function balanced by Treg cells after single or multi-allergen SIT Ozdemir C, Kukuksezer U, Akdis M, Acdis CA.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011;107:381–392. Jutel M, Akdis CA. Immunological mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy. Allergy 2011; 66: 725–732. Th9 iTreg

  30. Monotherapy for the polysensitized patient • CONCLUSIONS • The majority of AR and asthma patients are polysensitized • SIT (SCIT and SLIT) with single allergen is effective in polysensitized patients • Further head-to-head comparisons of the efficacy of SIT in polysensitized vs. monosensitized patients are required in the context of RCTs. • “Decision must be based on the allergen which causes:”* • The longest duration of symptoms per year • The most severe symptoms • A major impact on quality of life • Which is more difficult to avoid * Allergy 2010; 65: 1525–1530.

More Related