1 / 13

Electronic Audit Update

Electronic Audit Update. Theresa H. Alexander USEPA/CAMD. Agenda. Review of the process Summary of the 2006 audit activities Appendix D & E checks Additional audits Common Errors Process changes with re-engineering Next steps. Review of the Audit Process.

reed
Download Presentation

Electronic Audit Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Electronic Audit Update Theresa H. Alexander USEPA/CAMD

  2. Agenda • Review of the process • Summary of the 2006 audit activities • Appendix D & E checks • Additional audits • Common Errors • Process changes with re-engineering • Next steps

  3. Review of the Audit Process • The initial review of the electronic data is performed by the Emissions Tracking System (ETS) • Feedback is given upon submittal for that quarterly file • Checks on file format, completeness, and recalculation of hourly data are performed • A comprehensive audit of the data is performed using the Monitoring Data Checking (MDC) Software • Reviews the reported QA tests and Test Calculations • Identifies hours for which a test has expired, missing, or failed as invalid • Checks the Monitoring Plan and tracks changes to ensure that the data is collected in a manner consistent with the rule • EMB staff work with sources to resolve errors when identified • Feedback from the E-Audit is sent to the sources • Critical errors must be corrected and the EDR resubmitted by the deadline • CAMD Engineers work with the sources to resolve the errors (e.g., missing records, incorrect parameters, or substitute data) • Conduct Ad hoc checks

  4. Summary of the 2006 Activities • Audited all CEMS, Appendix D, Appendix E & Low Mass Emissions (LME) units • Continued to focus on the units with critical errors • Most sources are being very responsive to our feedback • There were very few mistakes in the bias adjustment factor applications (BAF) • Most of the critical errors were from small or new units • Our biggest challenge was with the Appendix D and Appendix E units

  5. Appendix D Audit Checks • A historical search of the CAMD database for the most recent fuel flow meter accuracy test and primary element inspection (if applicable) to determine whether the monitoring system is up-to-date with required QA tests • Accuracy tests are required every four calendar quarters but may be extended up to 5 years (20 quarters) from the previous test by the following exceptions • Test deadline extensions for “non-QA” quarters • Use of the fuel flow-to-load ratio test provisions in section 2.1.7 of Appendix D • For orifice, nozzle and venture-type flow meters, a primary element inspection is required every 3 years (12 quarters), unless the deadline is extended using the fuel flow-to-load ratio test

  6. Appendix E Audit Checks • Peaking unit status • QA fuel flow meter • NOx emission re-tests are required every 5 years (20 quarters), and whenever the monitored QA parameters are not within acceptable ranges for greater than 16 consecutive unit operating hours

  7. Additional Audits • Ad hoc checks • Target Tool for Field Audits (TTFA) is used to generate a list of “suspect units” • List generated is based on statistical analyses of the data • Issues are investigated by the CAMB engineers • Helps the states/regional offices target their field audits • CAMD conducts field audits based on TTFA results • Field audits are conducted by States, CAMD’s contractor and/or EMB

  8. Appendix D & E Errors • Failure to report the initial fuel flow meter accuracy test • Failure to conduct the primary element inspection • Failure to conduct or late flow meter quality assurance checks

  9. Certification & QA Tests • RATA tests are conducted at the wrong loads • Linearity checks are performed with the wrong value or expired calibration gases • Use of Like-Kind analyzers • Linearity check must be completed by end of 168 operating hour after the probationary calibration error (CE ) test. • Use of these analyzers are limited to 720 cumulative operating hours per calendar year at a particular unit or stack. • To use the “LK” analyzer for > 720 cumulative operating hours, a RATA is required and the analyzer must be redesignated as a backup system in the monitoring plan.

  10. Failure to Monitor all Emissions • Probe leaks • Holes in Ductwork • Especially, holes prior to control devices • Failure to maintain ductwork • Ash Handling Systems • Some systems remove emissions • Primarily affects flow-concentration systems • Bypass Stacks • Must account for emissions from bypass stacks • No start-up, shut-down or malfunction exemptions

  11. Process changes with re-engineering • Emissions Collection and Monitoring Plan System (ECMPS) client tool allows you to evaluate your data before submitting it • CAMD engineers are available to assist you in resolving critical errors • We will continue to conduct ad hoc audits and refer “suspect” units for further investigation &/or field audits

  12. Next Steps • Continue 100% electronic audit of data • Add checks to TTFA if more areas of concern come up • Continue to work in partnership with the states and regions • Continue daily communications with the sources • Prepare for the CAIR monitoring submittals

  13. Contact Information • 202-343-9747 • Alexander.theresa@epa.gov

More Related