1 / 76

Restoring Ditched Salt Marshes: Acting Today, Preparing for the Next 100 years

Restoring Ditched Salt Marshes: Acting Today, Preparing for the Next 100 years. S.C. Adamowicz, Ph.D.; US FWS B. Argow, Ph.D.; Wesley College Z. Hughes, Ph.D.; Boston University J. Franklin, Dalhousie University E. Hazelton, Utah State University J. Kramer, US FWS. Overview.

raquel
Download Presentation

Restoring Ditched Salt Marshes: Acting Today, Preparing for the Next 100 years

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Restoring Ditched Salt Marshes: Acting Today, Preparing for the Next 100 years S.C. Adamowicz, Ph.D.; US FWS B. Argow, Ph.D.; Wesley College Z. Hughes, Ph.D.; Boston University J. Franklin, Dalhousie University E. Hazelton, Utah State University J. Kramer, US FWS

  2. Overview • Introduction • Concepts • Ditch types & history • Predicted Future Conditions • Previous Restoration Efforts • New Techniques

  3. Unditched Marshes:Nauset Marsh, MA

  4. Fisherman’s Island, VA

  5. Webhannet Marsh, Wells, ME

  6. Introduction • Salt marshes • Are extensive ecosystems dominated by halophytic grasses • Are a highly productive • Provide important ecosystem services • Fish & wildlife habitat • Storm surge protection • Nutrient cycling • Flood attenuation • Shoreline protection • Marine fishery nurseries • C-sequestration

  7. Important Concepts • Resilience • Salt marsh capital • Self-sustaining processes

  8. Resilience Ecosystems possessing high resilience can be pushed to extremes without reorganizing into a different form of stable state. Systems lacking resilience can be “pushed” into an alternative stable state, of which there may be more than one.

  9. Concepts cont • Salt Marsh Capital S. Alterniflora Growth zone MSL

  10. Concepts cont • Salt Marsh Capital S. Alterniflora Growth zone MSL

  11. Concepts cont • Self-sustaining ecosystem processes

  12. Ditching History • Colonial Times • Public Works Administration • OMWM • Other misc (boat access, pipelines, etc)

  13. Colonial Ditching • Purpose- salt hay production, pasturing • Characteristics – • “step across” x 1 ft deep • Boundary ditches 3 ft deep • Spacing: “able to turn a horse” ~60 ft • Methods of construction • Hand digging

  14. Recipe to make Manure. Take the Soil and Mud, which you cutt up and throw out when you dig Ditches in a Salt Marsh, and put 20 Load of it in a heap. (John Adams, 1771) John Adams by John Trumbull; wikitree.com

  15. Salt marsh haystack; M. J. Heade 1863

  16. Public Works Ditching • Purpose – mosquito control • Characteristics- • 1- many feet deep • 1- many feet wide • Methods: see subsequent slides • Bourn & Cottam 1950 By mid-century ~90% of salt marshes from Maine to Virginia had been ditched

  17. Botsford Spade Photos Courtesy CT DEP: Paul Capitosto

  18. Hay knife Crew Hay knife

  19. Westbrook method of piling peat

  20. Hammonasett State Park, CTClogged ditch

  21. Scavel Plow

  22. Ditch cleaning at Hammonasett

  23. Hammonasett State Park, CT 90 ft spacing

  24. Bombay Hook NWR

  25. Parker River NWR

  26. Prime Hook NWR 150 ft spacing

  27. Stewart B. McKinney NWR 100 ft spacing

  28. Rumstick Point, RI 90-130 ft spacing

  29. Stewart B. McKinney NWR

  30. Effects of Ditches: Drainage • Redfield 1972:“The general effect of ditching is to reduce the natural drainage system by providing an alternate route for the flow of water.” Adamowicz 2002

  31. Ditch Effects: Elevation & Sedimentation • LeMay (2007) • Natural marsh: creeks fill first then sheet flow covers the marsh • Ditched marsh: interior fills first & remains flooded for longer period of time • Increased ditch length within a given area correlated with decreased elevation • Reduced elevation and increased inundation did not  more sedimentation • Ditched marshes were net erosive environments

  32. Ditch Effects: Elevation Total elevation and accretion reduced at ditched sites Erwin et al. unpublished data

  33. Ditch Effects: Biodiversity • Corman(2011): • natural creeks have higher species richness • No change in density BUT: • Mummichogs preferred upper creeks but lower ditches • Clarke et al. (1984): • Shorebirds, wading birds, terns, swallows & crows deprived of foraging areas (inadequate foraging areas)

  34. OMWM: Open Marsh Water Management Ditches • Open Marsh Water Management • Construct shallow ditches and pools to link fish reservoirs to mosquito breeding areas • Keep fish on the marsh in between tides • Use natural control mechanisms (fish, water regulation) to reduce mosquito production

  35. WertheimNWR

  36. Parker River OMWM

  37. Prime Hook OMWM Site

  38. East Coast Sea Level Changes • Sea Levels Online http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends.html

  39. Mean Sea Level Trend8534720 Atlantic City, New Jersey The mean sea level trend is 3.99 millimeters/year with a 95% confidenceinterval of +/- 0.18 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from 1911 to 2006 which is equivalent to a change of 1.31 feet in 100 years. http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8534720

  40. Mean Sea Level Trend8557380 Lewes, Delaware The mean sea level trend is 3.20 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence interval of +/- 0.28 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from 1919 to 2006 which is equivalent to a change of 1.05 feet in 100 years. http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8557380

  41. Mean Sea Level Trend8443970 Boston, Massachusetts The mean sea level trend is 2.63 millimeters/year with a 95% confidenceinterval of +/- 0.18 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from 1921 to 2006 which is equivalent to a change of 0.86 feet in 100 years http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8443970

  42. Mean Sea Level Trend8418150 Portland, Maine The mean sea level trend is 1.82 millimeters/year with a 95% confidenceinterval of +/- 0.17 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from 1912 to 2006 which is equivalent to a change of 0.60 feet in 100 years. http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8418150

  43. Summary: Future Conditions • Different rates of SLR versus…. • Marsh capital • Sediment supply • Growth rate (increased CO2 increased Growth rate)

  44. Effects of Previous Management Efforts • Ditch plugging • Ditch filling • OMWM/closed systems

  45. Groundwater Results Moody Normal Transect Distance (m) a b,c Depth to groundwater (cm) d b b,c Open Ditch b,c b,c,d c,d Plugged Ditch e e

  46. Granite Point 10 Moody 10 Parker River A 15 Parker River B2 6 Westbrook 16 Hammonasset State Park 24+ Peat Study Site Locations(Age of plugs)

  47. Ditch Plugging 2005: Groundwater Levels

  48. Groundwater 2009: Creek, Ditch, Plugged Ditch

  49. Soil Bulk Density 2009 Significant Treatment Effects p<0.01 -0.001 **

More Related