1 / 66

Too Dynamic to Describe?

Too Dynamic to Describe?. NASIG Annual Conference June 2004, Milwaukee, Wis. Bonnie Parks, Oregon State Univ. Jian Wang, Portland State Univ. References. Anglo - American Cataloging Rules, Second Edition, 2002 Revision (AACR2)

piera
Download Presentation

Too Dynamic to Describe?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Too Dynamic to Describe? NASIG Annual Conference June 2004, Milwaukee, Wis. Bonnie Parks, Oregon State Univ. Jian Wang, Portland State Univ.

  2. References • Anglo - American Cataloging Rules, Second Edition, 2002 Revision (AACR2) • SCCTP Integrating Resources Cataloging Workshop prepared by Steve Miller • OCLC Technical Bulletin 247. Coding Practice for Integrating Resources: www.oclc.org/technicalbulletins/247/#1 • CONSER Cataloging Manual (CCM) • CONSER Editing Guide (CEG)

  3. Issues to Contemplate • What is an integrating resource (IR)? • Why/who catalog IRs? • New concepts, rules, and principles in AACR2, 2002 Revision • What are the challenges in cataloging IRs?

  4. A New Concept • What is an Integrating Resource? A bibliographic resource that is added to or changed by means of updates that do not remain discrete and are integrated into the whole. An integrating resource may be finite or continuing. Examples include updating databases, updating loose-leafs, and updating websites.

  5. Why Catalog Integrating Resources? • Proliferation of electronic materials • Changing collections • Provides one stop access • Inclusive and flexible catalog • New standards and rules

  6. Who Catalogs Integrating Resources? • Serials catalogers • Electronic resource catalogers • Monographic catalogers • Integrating resources catalogers • Metadata catalogers

  7. AACR2 Revisions – New Concepts • Chapter 9: Electronic Resources • Chapter 12: Continuing Resources • Serials • Integrating resources • Chapter 21: Choice of Access Points • Rules for title changes

  8. Changes in Chapter 9 • Old title: Computer Files • New title: Electronic Resources • Scope: covers all electronic resources, including direct (local) or remote (networked) • New GMD: [electronic resource] • Chief Source Information: the resource itself instead of the title screen

  9. Changes in Chapter 12 • Old title: Serials • New title: Continuing Resources (serials and integrating resources) • New concept: Integrating Resources (used for dynamic electronic resources) • New issuance: Integrating (in addition to monograph and serial)

  10. Changes in Chapter 21 • Integrating resources. If a change occurs in the title proper of the same integrating resource, do not make a new entry. Instead, replace the title proper with the new title and change the description to reflect the latest information. In general, give the earlier title in a note (see 12.7B4.2).

  11. Highlights for Cataloging IRs • LCRI 1.0 • AACR2 rules • Bibliographic formats and standards • Cataloging entry conventions • MARC 21 coding changes • 006 coding sheet for serials

  12. How do I catalog this? Is this an integrating resource? • Does it fit the definition of an IR? • does not remain discrete • integrated into the whole • Is this an updating database/web site? • Refer to LCRI 1.0A for guidance: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcri1_0.html

  13. AACR2 Rules • Strategy Use rules in Chapter 12 in conjunction with other chapters in cataloging integrating resources: • Example Use chapters 3, 9 & 12 for cataloging updating cartographic Web sites

  14. MARC Codes • Bibliographic Formats and Standards has been updated to include OCLC Phase 1 changes:www.oclc.org/bibformats/en • Changes to fixed field elements Freq, S/L, SrTp • Scope of some variable fields redefined to include both continuing & integrating resources: 022, 222, 247/547, 310, 321, 362, and some notes

  15. Fixed Field: S/L (Entry Convention) • Use code 2to indicate that the record was formulated using the revised rules for integrated entry • The record is cataloged under latest title or issuing body • Use for continuing & integrating resources that do not retain their earlier titles.

  16. What’s the difference between Integrating Resources and Serials? • Integrating resources: • Description based on the latest iteration • Use of integrated entry cataloging • Serials: • Description based on the earliest issue • Use of successive entry cataloging

  17. MARC Tagging • Before code “i” implementation: Code IR as monographs: Bib level “m” Add Serials 006 for integrating resources • After code “i” implementation: Code IR as integrating resources: Bib level “i” Most will have Type of Record “a” and Serials 008

  18. New MARC 21Tags 022– ISSN247/547– Change in title proper310/321– Frequency362 1– Beginning/ending date of publication550 – Issuing body note580, 76X-78X– Relationships with other resources

  19. Case Study # 1 • How do I select the Type of Record and Type of Computer File codes that best characterize the content of the resource?

  20. Type of Record (Leader/06) • OCLC Fixed Field “Type” • Examples: • Type “a” (document) • Type “e” (map) • Type “i” (nonmusical sound recording) • Type “m” (computer game)

  21. Type of Record (Leader/06), 2 • Type “a” vs. Type “m” • Use Type “a” Language Material for textual electronic resources • Use Type “m” Computer File for non- textual electronic materials

  22. Is this web site Type “a” or “m”? Type “a”

  23. Is this web site Type “a” or “m”? Type “m”

  24. In Case of Doubt? • Code the resource “m” (computer file) “Guidelines for Coding Electronic Resource in Leader/06/ Library of Congress”

  25. Field 006/09 (Computer files/Electronic resources) • Required by OCLC for text-based electronic resources. Example: • Type = a • BLvl = m (“i” in the future) • 006 (Computer files) • 006 (Continuing resources)

  26. Field 006/09 & 008/26 (Type of Computer File Codes) a = Numeric data b = Computer program d = Document e = Bibliographic data h = Sound i = Interactive multimedia j = Online system or service m = Combination

  27. a m For computer files/electronic resources

  28. 006 for Computer files Audn: File: e GPub: 006 for Continuing resources Freq: _ Regl: x ISSN: SrTp: d Orig: s Form: s EntW: Cont: GPub: Conf: 0 Alph: a S/L: 2

  29. Type of Record & Type of Computer File? j m j

  30. m Type of Record & Type of Computer File? a

  31. Additional Guidelines Guidelines for Coding Electronic Resource in Leader/06/ Library of Congress: • http://lcweb.loc.gov/marc/ldr06guide.html • Cataloging Electronic Resources: OCLC-MARC Coding Guidelines: • http://www.oclc.org/oclc/cataloging/type.htm • Use of Fixed Fields 006/007/008 and Leader Codes in CONSER Records: • http://lcweb.loc.gov/acq/conser/ffuse.html

  32. Case Study #2 • What do I consider the best choice for chief source of information and title proper? Title proper ?

  33. Chief Source of Information • What is the chief source of information? • the resource itself (AACR2R 9.0B1) • How to determine the best choice for chief source? • the source that provides the most complete information

  34. Title Proper – How do you transcribe title (245) and variant forms of title (246)? • Do not record introductory words not intended to be part of the title, such as “Welcome to” (1.1B1). • The title may be noted and treated as a variant title (1.B1 and 1.7B4).

  35. Title Proper? Three options for title proper: • Plants database • Welcome to plants national database • Plants national database

  36. Which is the best choice for title proper for this web site? Four options for title proper: • AgeLine database • AgeLine • AARP AgeLine • AARP

  37. Other Title Information • AACR212.1E1: Transcribe other title information if considered to be important for integrating resources.

  38. Would you transcribe other title info. after the title proper? 245 00 MedlinePlus $h [electronic resource]. OR 245 00 MedlinePlus $h [electronic resource] : $b trusted health information for you. Which would you choose?

  39. Additional Guidelines • AACR2 Chapter 9 and 12 rules for chief source of information, Area 1 (title and statement of responsibility)

  40. Case Study # 3 • Where do I locate information on publisher, place, and dates of publication?

  41. Publisher vs. Host? s

  42. Where is the Place of Publication?

  43. Dates of Publication? s

  44. 260 [Atlanta, Ga.?] : $b American Cancer Society 362 1# Probably began after 1997.

  45. Additional Guidelines • AACR2 Chapter 9 and 12 rules for chief source of information, Area 4 (publication, etc.)

  46. Case Study # 4 • The title has changed, now what do I do?

  47. When a Data Element Changes (LCRI 12.7A2) • Give exact information about the timing of the change if it is available • If exact information is not available, use information that already exists in the record. • Use the date from the “viewed on” note (500 field) and put the date in angle brackets: <Mar, 24, 2004>

  48. Changes to title proper • If changes occur in the title proper in a later iteration: • Do not create a new record • Modify the title and statement of responsibility area (245 $a/n/p/c) to reflect the current iteration. • Data elements of previous iterations are recorded in notes if considered important • If needed for access, make added entry for earlier title proper (247/547)

  49. MARC Tagging for Change in Title Proper • 247 Former title proper • Generates a title added entry • 547 Former title proper complexity note • Used for complex situations, or when a title added entry is not needed • LCRI 12.7B42 says to give a separate 547 “title history” note in addition to the 247 field if the 247 does not provide adequate explanation.

More Related