1 / 53

Ya. B. Zeldovich All-Moscow Seminar of Astrophysicists

Ya. B. Zeldovich All-Moscow Seminar of Astrophysicists. Plamen Fiziev LTF JINR Dubna. Models of Neutron Stars without Functional Relation between the Radius and Mass 16 December 201 Moscow. ?. Tolman-Opehgeimer-Volkov system. EOS.

peyton
Download Presentation

Ya. B. Zeldovich All-Moscow Seminar of Astrophysicists

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ya. B. ZeldovichAll-Moscow Seminar of Astrophysicists Plamen Fiziev LTF JINR Dubna Models of Neutron Stars without Functional Relation between the Radius and Mass 16 December 201 Moscow ?

  2. Tolman-Opehgeimer-Volkovsystem EOS

  3. Does the M-R relation exist at all ?Where is it coming from ??? In standard notations: Nonrelativistic limit: Nonrelativistic solution for:

  4. Integrating TOV from to GR critical mass:

  5. Realistic (to some extend)EOS for NS: A two-solar-mass neutron star 2 8 O C T O B E R 2 0 1 0 | VO L 4 6 7 | N AT U R E | 1 0 8 1

  6. The results strongly suggest the existence of a bimodal distribution of the masses, with the first peak around 1.37M⊙, a much wider second peak at 1.73M⊙. arXiv:1011.4291: THE NEUTRON STAR MASS DISTRIBUTION R.Valentim, E. Rangel and J.E. Horvath arXiv:1101.4872:Mass distribution of neutron stars B. Kızıltan, A. Kottas. S. E. Thorsett Neutron stars in double neutron star and neutron star-white dwarf systems show consistent respective peaks at 1.35M⊙ and 1.50M⊙. The results strongly suggest the existence of a bimodal distribution of the masses, with the first peak around 1.37M⊙, a much wider second peak at 1.73M⊙.

  7. 2011ApJ742 1(November, the 2-nd) arXiv:1106.3131 Denis A. Leahy, Sharon M. Morsink and Yi Chou The accreting millisecond pulsar XTE J1807-294 is studied through a pulse-shape modeling analysis. The model includes blackbody and Comptonized emission from the one visible hot spot and makes use of the Oblate Schwarzschild approximation for ray-tracing. We include a scattered light contribution, which accounts for flux scattered off an equatorial accretion disk to the observer including time delays in the scattered light. We give limits to mass and radius for XTE J1807-294 and compare these to limits determined for SAX J1808-3658 and XTE J1814-334 previously determined using similar methods. The resulting allowed region for mass-radius curves is small but consistent with a mass-radius relation with nearly constant radius (~12 km) for masses between 1 and 2.5 solar masse.

  8. As long as an EOS mass-radius curve has sections that pass through each of the star’s 3 σ allowed regions, it will be allowed by all 3 stars’ data. NO ONE of the EOS curves in the figure possess this property.

  9. Excluded 10 soft EoS (arXiv:1108.2166) ps, prak_data, schaf2, schaf1, pclnphq, pal2, ms1506, gm3nph, gm2nph, gm1nph XTE J1814-338 XTE J1807-294 SAX J1808 Warning: the star rotation still not taken into account !!!

  10. Excluded 10 stiff EoS (arXiv:1108.2166) wff1, wff2, wff3, wff4, MPA1, ms2, ms00, engvik, AP1, AP2, AP3, AP4 XTE J1814-338 XTE J1807-294 SAX J1808 Warning: the star rotation still not taken into account !!!

  11. Still remain 2 stiff EoS: AP3 and MPA1 ??? Observations versus EoSAp3 and MPA1 MPA1 AP3 XTE J1814-338 XTE J1807-294 SAX J1808 Warning: the star rotation still not taken into account !!!

  12. XTE J1807-294 MPA1 AP3 XTE J1814-338 SAX J1808 m*- r* relation does not exist in the Nature!!!

  13. Christian D. Ott, Evan P. O'Connor, Basudeb Dasgupta, arXiv:1111.6282 The figure shows that none of the current set of available EOS allow for a 2-M neutron star while at the same time being consistent with the current mass-radius constraints from observations. The crux is that the EOS needs to be sufficiently stiff to support 2-M neutron stars and at the same time sufficiently soft to make neutron stars with moderate radii n the canonical mass range. This balance appears to be difficult to realize. The stiff set of RMF EOS produce systematically too large neutron stars. The soft compressible liquid-droplet LS180 EOS agrees well with the mass-radius constraints, but is ruled out by its failure to support a 2-M neutron star. Mass-radius relations for 10 publically available finite temperature EOS along with several constraints. Ozel et al. analyzed three accreting and bursting neutron star systems and derived mass-radius regions shown in green. Steiner et al. performed a combined anaylsis of six accreting neutron star systems, shown are 1- and 2- results in blue.

  14. An old problem: Comparizon of the interior and exterior mass – radius relations

  15. Ap&SS.234...39L, 1995 A more recent results: ? What is the situation now ?

  16. A.M.Cherepashchuk, talk at 15th Lomonosov Conference, 18 of August, 2011, Moscow State University HNXB + LMXB NS Exploding Star BH candidates The Number of the BH candidates does not increase with decreasing of their masses. It seems to be strange because the number of stars in the Galaxy – progenitors of BHs (M > 30 M) is strongly increasing with decreasing of their masses: N ~ M - 5.

  17. Neutron Star Discovered Where a Black Hole Was Expected November 02, 2005,Westerlund 1 A very massive star collapsed to form a neutron star and not ablack hole as expected, according to new results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory. This discovery shows that nature has a harder time making black holes than previously thought.

  18. Scientists found this neutron star -- a dense whirling ball of neutrons about 12 miles in diameter -- in an extremely young star cluster. Astronomers were able to use well-determined properties of other stars in the cluster to deduce that the progenitor of this neutron star was at least 40 times the mass of the Sun. • "Our discovery shows that some of the most massive stars do not collapse to form black holes as predicted, but instead form neutron stars." said Michael Muno, a UCLA postdoctoral Hubble Fellow and lead author of a paper to be published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

  19. Muno and colleagues discovered a pulsing neutron starin a cluster of stars known as Westerlund 1. This cluster contains a hundred thousand or more stars in a region only 30 light years across, which suggests that all the stars were born in a single episode of star formation. Based on optical properties such as brightness and color some of the normal stars in the cluster are known to have masses of about 40 suns.Since the progenitor of the neutron star has already exploded as a supernova, its mass must have been more than 40 solar masses.

  20. Matt Visser, Black holes in general relativity. Do black holes “exist” ? PoS BHs,GR andS trings 2008: 001, 2008, arXiv:0901.4365 “This innocent question is more subtle than one might expect, and the answer depends very much on whether one is thinking as an observational astronomer, a classical general relativist, or a theoretical physicist.” Astronomers have certainly seen things that are small, dark, and heavy. Classical general relativist: Eternal black holes certainly exist mathematically. Theoretical physicist: We have not seen direct observational evidence of the event horizon. The mathematical solutions sufferessential physical shortcomings! Visser M, Barcelo C, Liberati S, Sonego S: gr-qc/0902.0346 Small, dark, and heavy: But is it a black hole?

  21. The Mass and the spin of the Black Hole(?)in Cygnus X-1 arXiv:1106.3688,1106.3689,1106.3690 O-type supergiant Distnace 1.86 +0.12 −0.11 kpc Kerr black hole (?) with a spin parameter a∗ > 0.97 (3 σ) News: arXiv:1110.4374: A weak compact jet in a soft state of Cygnus X-1

  22. New Models of Neutron Stars without Mass-Radius Relation

  23. Some geometry An auxiliary Euclidean 3D space: 3D spherically symmetric Riemannian space: The area: The radial distance: The volume:

  24. Familiar case: Unusual case: The spherically symmetric 3D geometry in terms of area radius (Hilbert gauge 1917):

  25. The original Schwarzschild solution(1916) tt The center is at the metric singularity !

  26. How it could be ?!? Apoint with a finite surface!!! Yes! It exists in GR! Area blowing around the center: |dl|=|ds|: dt=0, dθ=0, dϕ=0

  27. Where M-R relation is coming from in the relativistic problem R*, M* In general case c If

  28. The real situation for WD:,Springer, 2000

  29. Theory with VERSUSObservations for 1175 WD PF: arXiv:astro-ph/0409456 - Madej et al.: arXiv:astro-ph/0404344

  30. TOV EOS r*=13.6 km rc(m*,r*)>0 rc(m*,r*)=0 r*=13.6 km rc(m*,r*)>0

  31. Generalized TOV NS: more details r*=13.6 km r*=13.6 km r*=13.6 km r*=13.6 km

  32. c The new theoretical model A striking mass gap arXiv:1110.1635 The domain of nonstable NS = GRB ??? Different type of SN explosions? or Different type of NS ?

  33. Analytical EOS for NS Haensel, P., & Potekhin, A. Y. 2004, A&A, 428, 191. C. Gungor, K. Y. EksiarXiv:1108.2166 MPA1 EOS

  34. MPA1 EOS r*=13.6 km r*=13.6 km rc(m*,r*)>0 rc(m*,r*)>0 r*=13.6 km rc(m*,r*)>0 r*=13.6 km rc(m*,r*)>0

  35. MPA1 EOS r*=13.6 km r*=13.6 km r*=13.6 km r*=13.6 km r*=13.6 km A negative mass deffect Instability

  36. r*=13.6 km MPA1 EOS Strong instability and explosion of the light neutron stars: m*ʘ < 0.3 r*km = 13.6 r*=13.6 km

  37. r*=13.6 km MPA1 EOS For r* = 13.6 km m min = 0.3463 ʘ r*=13.6 km

  38. EOS pal2

  39. NASA's WISE Mission Captures Black Hole's Wildly Flaring Jet WISE images showing strong bursts and dimming of infrared light in the ”black hole” GX 339-4. The data cover a period of approximately 1 day, speeded up.

  40. arXiv:1109.4064 Temporal analysis of long and short GRB light curves carried out here supports the 83 general observation that the short bursts are temporally similar to long ones but compressed 384 in time, which could be related to the nature of the central engine of the respective bursts. A A sample pulse fit to one long burst GRB080723D (upper plot) and one short burst GRB090227B (lower plot). The histogram in black is the GRB light curve and the fitted background is shown as black dashed line. The pulses shown in green are the lognormal pulses fitted to those in the light curves. The sum of the background model and the fitted pulses is shown as purple continuous line. The goodness of fit parameter, n, is indicated at the top right corner of each plot. Sample pulse fits to the lowest 6 energy channels of NaI and the full energy range light curve from BGO detector of a long GRB 090626A.

  41. Thank You

  42. Somesuspectedto beBHobjects:astro-ph/0808.0435

  43. arXiv:0911.5408v1 [astro-ph.HE]

  44. The Schwarzschild radii and the geometrical radii of some astrophysical objects

  45. Dr. Neil Gehrels of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md., Swift principal investigator. "None of this was realized before simply because we couldn't get to the scene of the explosion fast enough." "Swift has the unique ability to detect bursts and turn its X-ray and ultraviolet-optical telescopes to the explosion's embers within minutes. As such,Swift is detecting new burst details that might rewrite theory."

  46. A new 2008 result: astro-ph/0804-1856 The mass of the progenators of long duration GRB (Witnessing the real death of massive stars) • For star population ~ 5 Myr > 50 Solar masses • For star population ~ 8 Myr > 25 Solar masses • For star population < 7 Myr > 20 Solar masses Nevertheless, in the collapse which leads to long duration GRB BH do not form at least in the “classical” way.

  47. astro-ph/0805.014

More Related