slide1
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Corruption in turbulent times: a response to shocks? Joël Cariolle

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 25

Corruption in turbulent times: a response to shocks? Joël Cariolle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 124 Views
  • Uploaded on

Corruption in turbulent times: a response to shocks? Joël Cariolle University of Auvergne ( UdA /CERDI) Foundation for Researches and Studies on International Development (FERDI). MOTIVATIONS The contribution of governance quality to output fluctuations is widely documented:

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Corruption in turbulent times: a response to shocks? Joël Cariolle' - peta


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
slide1

Corruption in turbulent times: a response to shocks?

JoëlCariolle

University of Auvergne (UdA/CERDI)

Foundation for Researches and Studies on International Development (FERDI)

slide2

MOTIVATIONS

  • The contribution of governance quality to output fluctuations is widely documented:
    • bad governance contributes to domestic fluctuations (Acemoglu et al. 2003; Mobarak, 2005);
    • good governance contributes to absorb external shocks (Rodrik, 2000; Arin et al, 2011).
  • Economic shocks are more likely to occur and to persist in countries with low governance quality
slide3

MOTIVATIONS

  • However, evidence on the effect of economic fluctuations on governance quality is scarcer and more recent:
    • Pro-cyclical effect (Voors et al., 2011);
    • Contra-cyclical effect(Borcan et al., 2012);
    • Nonlinear effect: depending on informational asymmetries between politicians and voters(Aidt and Dutta, 2008), or the opportunity cost of corrupt acts (Dalgaard and Olsson, 2008).
    • This paper proposes and tests an analytical framework for the effect of economic instability on corruption, reconciling these contributions
slide4

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

    • Micro and macroeconomic literature on the effect of risk (Elberset al., 2007; Bardhan and Udry, 1999) separates:
      • the ex ante effect of economic instability, resulting from the perception of instability;from
      • the ex post effect of economic instability, resulting from the experience of instability.
  • Ex ante and ex post effects of economic instability on corruption?
slide5

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

  • The ex ante effect of instability on corruption
  • When credit and insurance market are imperfect, high perceptions of instability may trigger ex antecorruption strategies aimed at reducing exposure to shocks.
  • Examples:
    • influencing procurement processes and winning long-term public contracts (Goldman et al., 2013);
    • building ex ante political connections to ensure financial support if hardships occur (Faccioet al, 2013); or
    • obtaining obliging regulations and protections (Grossman and Helpman, 1994; Cassing et al. 1986).
  • Positive ex ante effect of instability on corruption, resulting from “resource-locking” corruption strategies
slide6

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

  • The ex post effect of instability on corruption
  • The experience of shocks may trigger two opposite ex post corruption responses:
    • Opportunistic corruption,pro-cyclical,following rises and falls in economic activity (Voors et al., 2010; Dalgaard and Olsson, 2008);
    • Survival corruption,contra-cyclical, arising from the necessity to compensate incomes losses (Borcanet al., 2012).
  • The direction of the net ex post effect is a priori uncertain, and depends on the marginal effect of shocks on corruption (Dalgaard and Olsson, 2008)
analytical framework
ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

The ex post effect of instability on corruption

Constant marginal effect of shocks

Scenario 1: (Net) pro-cyclical effect

Scenario 2: (Net) contra-cyclical effect

Symmetric responses to shocks

analytical framework1
ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

The ex post effect of instability on corruption

Non constant marginal effect of shocks

Scenario 3:Symmetric deterrent effect of shocks

Scenario 4: Symmetric positive effect of shocks

Asymmetric responses to positive and negative shocks

slide9

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK

  • The ex post effect of instability on corruption
  • Institutional features affectthe marginal effect of shocks through the marginal cost of corrupt acts:
    • financial markets access  opportunity cost of corrupt acts (Wang and You, 2012);
    • the quality of democratic institutions probability of detection/sanction of corrupt acts (Ahlin et Pang, 2008; Lederman et al. 2005); and
    • the intensity of economic fluctuations (Dalgaard and Olson, 2008)  makes previous democratic and financial constraints binding.
  • Key channels for a nonlinear ex post effect of instability on corruption
slide10

EMPIRICAL FRAMEWORK

  • Corruption equation
    • Corruption = f(ex ante; ex post; controls)
  • Dynamic panel estimations (FE, sys-GMM):
    • Corruption perception data (ICRG): 1125 observations from 62 developed and developing countries.
      • Cross-section estimations (OLS):
        • data on bribery incidence (WBES): 22,000 firms’ aggregated bribe reports for 38 developing countries
      • Controls: government size, human capital, democracy, political regime durability, population size, natural resource endowments, openness, firms’ characteristics (cross section estimations)
slide11

EMPIRICAL FRAMEWORK

  • Variables of interest: instabilities in export volume
  • Major, universal and exogenous source of instability in both developed and developing countries (Bevan et al. 1993; Guillaumont, 2010):
    • Perception of instability (ex ante effect): rolling standard deviation of exports(in % of a rolling mixed trend), calculated over a long period (t; t-15)
    • Experience of instability (ex post effect): rolling skewness of exports (in % of the same mixed trend), calculated over a short period (t; t-5):
      • reflects the export distribution asymmetry  predominance of positive shocks if >0,negative shocks if <0
      • reflects the intensity of fluctuations (Rancièreet al, 2008 QJE)  strong correlation with the kurtosis of a distribution at high absolute values
slide12

RESULTS

Evidence on the ex post effect of instability

Main result

The ex post effect of instability is nonlinear, depending on institutional and financial constraints underlyingthe marginal effect of shocks on corruption

slide13

RESULTS

Evidence on the ex post effect of instability

1.1. the intensity of fluctuations channel

Corruption = f(stddev; skew>0, skew<0; [skew>0]2, [skew<0]2)

slide14

RESULTS

  • Evidence on the ex post effect of instability
  • Estimates of 1.1support that:
              • both positive and negative shocks reduce corruptionwhenfluctuations are normal (high frequency, low size)
              • both positive and negative shocks increase corruption whenfluctuations are intense(low frequency, large size)
slide16

RESULTS

Evidence on the ex post effect of instability

1.2. The financial and institutional channels

Corruption = f( stddev; skew>0, skew<0; [skew>0chan]; [skew<0chan])

slide17

RESULTS

  • Evidence on the ex post effect of instability
  • Estimates of 1.2support that:
              • both positive and negative shocks reduce corruption when access to credit is facilitated and when democratic institutions are effective
              • both positive and negative shocks increase corruption when access to credit is restricted andwhen democratic institutions are weak
slide18

RESULTS

Access to creditchannel

slide19

RESULTS

Democracychannel (ICRG)

slide20

RESULTS

Democracychannel (WBES)

slide21

RESULTS

Evidence on the ex ante effect of instability

2. the financial institution channel

Corruption = f(stddev; [stddev × financial inst]; skew).

slide22

RESULTS

  • Evidence on the ex ante effect of instability
  • The ex ante effect of instability is also nonlinear, depending on financial market access:
    • Estimations of model 5 also support a positive ex ante effect of instability on corruption, especially when access to financial markets is restricted.
slide24

CONCLUSION

  • When economies are unstable and institutions are failing, economic agents are likely to engage in corruption to hedge against adverse fluctuations and to benefit from favorable ones.
  • As a result, both adverse and favorable shocksmayincrease corruption levels
  • Improving access to credit markets and supporting pillars of democracy, such as media independence, should dampen the adverse effects of instability on governance quality.
ad