1 / 44

Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service

This article explores the enhancements made in IEEE 802.11e for improved access control and quality of service. It covers topics such as MAC architecture, Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF), Enhanced Distributed Coordination Function (EDCF), Transmission Opportunity (TXOP), HCF Controlled Access, Requests for Network Services, Group ACK, Action Management Frame, and Scheduling Algorithms.

percyj
Download Presentation

Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Medium Access Control Enhancements for Quality of Service IEEE Std 802.11eTM-2005 November 2005

  2. Outline(we will cover only the RED parts) • MAC Architecture • Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF) • Enhanced Distributed Coordination Function (EDCF) • Transmission Opportunity (TXOP) • HCF Controlled Access • Requests for Network Services • Group ACK • Action Management Frame • Scheduling Algorithms

  3. Characteristics of IEEE 802.11e • The major enhancement of 802.11e • Traffic differentiation • Concept of Transmission Opportunity (TXOP) • Enhanced DCF (contention-based) • HCP controlled channel access (contention free) • Burst ACK (optional) • Direct link protocol (DLP)

  4. MAC Architecture IEEE 802.11 MAC Architecture IEEE 802.11e MAC Architecture • DCF : A contention-base access for 802.11. • PCF : An option to support contention-free access in 802.11. • Hybrid Coordination Function (HCF): IEEE 802.11 Task Group E (TGe) proposes HCF to provide QoS for real-time applications.

  5. HCF - Introduction • HCF combines functions from the DCF and PCF with enhanced QoS-specific mechanisms. • HCF consists of • Enhance DCF (EDCF) for contention-based access • Controlled Access (HCCA) for contention-free access

  6. EDCA

  7. EDCF – Traffic Category • The EDCF provides differentiated access to the WM for 8 priorities, identical to IEEE 802.1D priority tag, for non-AP STAs. • Priorities are numbered from 0 (the lowest priority) to 7 (the highest priority). • The set of MSDUs with the same priority is refer to a Traffic Category (TC).

  8. EDCF – Access Category (1/5) • EDCF defines access category (AC) mechanism to support the priority mechanism at QSTAs. • An AC is an enhanced variant of the DCF which contends for transmission opportunity (TXOP) using the set of parameters such as CWmin[AC], CWmax[AC], AIFS[AC], etc.

  9. EDCF – Access Category (2/5)IFS (Inter Frame Spacing)

  10. EDCA

  11. EDCF – Access Category (3/5) • The parameter set is specified in the “EDCA parameter set element” of beacon frames. • Default QoS parameter set: video voice

  12. EDCF – Access Category (4/5)Queues • An QSTA has four ACs. • Collision between ACs within a QSTA is called internal collision. Collisions will be resolved internally (giving to higher-priority queues).

  13. EDCF – Access Category (5/5) • The mapping from 8 priories to 4 ACs is:

  14. TXOP(omitted)

  15. TXOP • A TXOP is defined by a starting time and a maximum duration. • Two types of TXOP: EDCF TXOP and Polled TXOP. • An EDCF TXOP begins when the wireless medium is determined to be available under the EDCF rules, and the length of TXOP is specified in beacon frames. • An Polled TXOP begins when a QSTA receives a QoS(+)CF-Poll from HC, and the length of TXOP is specified in the QoS(+)CF-Poll.

  16. HCF Controlled Access – Introduction • Differences between hybrid coordinator (HC) and point coordinator (PC): • HC can poll QSTAs in both CP and CFP • HC grants a polled TXOP to one QSTA, which restricts the duration of the QSTA’s access to the medium.

  17. HCF Controlled Access – Frame Formats • General frame format for 802.11 and 802.11e: • Frame Control Field: =>IEEE 802.11 => IEEE 802.11e see next page

  18. HCF Controlled Access - New Data/Management/Control Frames

  19. HCF Controlled Access – QoS Control Field (1/3) • Symbols: • QoS+CF-Poll: including 3 control messages, QoS Data+CF-Poll, QoS Data+CF-Ack+CF-Poll, QoS CF-Ack+CF-Poll • QoS(+)CF-Poll: QoS+CF-Poll and QoS CF-Poll (4 control messages) • The QoS control field:

  20. HCF Controlled Access – QoS Control Field (2/3) • TID:

  21. HCF Controlled Access – QoS Control Field (3/3) • EOSP (End of Service Period): • Ack Policy: • Normal Ack: An Ack or QoS CF-Ack is required after a SIFS. • No Ack: • No Explicit Ack: There may be a response frame, but it is neither the Ack nor any Data frame of subtype +CF-Ack. (e.g., QoS CF-Poll, or QoS CF-Ack+CF-Poll). • Block Ack:

  22. Request for Network Services (omitted) Request for TXOP Request for TSPEC

  23. Requests for Network Services • Request for polled TXOP: • Non-AP QSTAs may request a polled TXOP by sending a QoS Data frame, QoS Null frame, or QoS CF-ACK frames with QoS control field to HC. • Request for a traffic stream: • Non-AP QSTAs may request a traffic stream by sending an Action managements frame (described latter) to HC.

  24. Traffic Stream • A traffic stream is the set of MSDUs which is delivered with the same traffic specification. • Traffic specification (TSPEC) includes the information of mean/max/min data rate, delay bound, etc. • (more later about definition of TSPEC)

  25. Action Management Frame –Introduction • An action management frame (refer to subtype 1101 in frame control field) contains a category field and an action details. • for QSTA to request a traffic stream see next page

  26. Action Management Frame –QoS Management Actions • For QoS management, the “Action Details” field contains following values:

  27. Action Management Frame –QoS Management Actions : Traffic Stream Management (1/3) • A QSTA can request a traffic stream by sending an ADDTS request frame to HC. TSPEC (information element)

  28. Action Management Frame –QoS Management Actions : Traffic Stream Management (2/3) • After HC receives an ADDTS request frame, it responds with an ADDTS respond frame.

  29. (cont.) Traffic Stream Management (3/3) • Service Schedule: • HC aggregates admitted TSPECs for a single QSTA and establishes a Service Schedule, in the schedule element field, for the QSTA. • The schedule QoS action frame is used by the QSTA for power management, internal scheduling, etc. • Use DELTS frame to delete a traffic stream.

  30. Action Management Frame –QoS Management Actions : Schedule • The HC can update the Service Schedule at any time by sending a Schedule QoS Action management frame which contains a Schedule element.

  31. Group ACK (omitted)

  32. Action Management Frame –QoS Management Actions : Group Acknowledgement (1/4) • The Group Acknowledgement mechanism improves the channel efficiency by allowing a group of QoS Data MPDUs to be transmitted, each separated by a SIFS period, and aggregating several acknowledgements into ONE frame. • Two types of Group ACK mechanisms: • immediate: for high-bandwidth, low latency traffic • delayed: for applications that can tolerate moderate latency.

  33. (cont.)Group Acknowledgement (2/4) • Message sequence:

  34. (cont.) Group Acknowledgement (3/4) • An example of immediate group ack:

  35. (cont.)Group Acknowledgement (4/4) • An example of delayed group ack:

  36. Scheduling Algorithms for IEEE802.11e Networks (omitted)

  37. TSPEC • Information element of management frames • Define the characteristics and QoS expectation of a traffic stream • Negotiated between QSTA and HC • TSPEC setup & delete • Use management frame with new subtype Action containing TSPEC element

  38. TSPEC Element Format

  39. Main Parameters of TSPEC • User priority (UP):priority to be used for the transport of packets in cases where relative prioritization is required (e.g., it can be used for admission control). It goes from 0 (lowest) to 7 (highest). • Maximum MSDU size (M):maximum size of the packets, in octets. • Maximum Burst Size (MBS):maximum size of the data burst that can be transmitted at the peak data rate, in octets • Minimum PHY rate (R):physical bit rate assumed by the scheduler for transmit time and admission control calculations, in units of bits per second. • Peak data rate (PR):maximum bit rate allowed for transfer of the packets.

  40. Main Parameters of TSPEC • Mean data rate (ρ):average bit rate for transfer of the packets, in units of bits per second. • Delay bound (D):maximum delay allowed to transport a packet across the wireless interface (including queuing delay), in milliseconds. • Nominal MSDU size (L):nominal size of the packets, in octets. • Maximum Service Interval (MSI):interval required by TS in this TSPEC between the start of two successive TXOPs.

  41. A Simple Scheduler (1/3) • Use some of TSPEC parameters to generate a schedule • Mean date rate • Nominal MSDU size • Maximum Service Interval or Delay Bound • The schedule for an admitted stream i is calculated in three steps • find an n which satisfies the following inequality, and then calculate the scheduled Service Interval (SI)

  42. A simple scheduler (2/3) • Calculate the number of MSDUs Ni of station i during one SI (based on the Mean Data Rate): • Calculate the TXOPi duration of station i: • Ri: physical transmission rate • O: overhead • M: maximum MSDU size

  43. A Simple Scheduler (3/3) • When a new stream is admitted • If the current SI is changed, all admitted streams need to recalculate their TXOP durations • When a stream is dropped • Announce the new schedule to all QSTAs • Admission control (referenced design)

  44. References • Y. Xiao, “An Analysis for Differentiated Services in IEEE 802.11 and IEEE 802.11e Wireless LANs”, Int’l Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems, 2004, pp. 32-39. • A. GRILO, M. MACEDO, and M. NUNES, “A SCHEDULING ALGORITHM FOR QOS SUPPORT IN IEEE802.11E NETWORKS”, IEEE Wireless Communications, June 2003.

More Related