1 / 11

Bornhuetter-Ferguson: Initial Expected Losses Working Party

Bornhuetter-Ferguson: Initial Expected Losses Working Party. Co-Chair: Jeff Carlson FCAS, MAAA Towers Perrin (Tillinghast) Co-Chair: Chris Olson FCAS, MAAA St. Paul Travelers 2004 CLRS Las Vegas, NV Session 7: Research Working Party Kick-off. Rationale.

peony
Download Presentation

Bornhuetter-Ferguson: Initial Expected Losses Working Party

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bornhuetter-Ferguson: Initial Expected Losses Working Party • Co-Chair: Jeff Carlson FCAS, MAAA Towers Perrin (Tillinghast) • Co-Chair: Chris Olson FCAS, MAAA St. Paul Travelers 2004 CLRS Las Vegas, NV Session 7: Research Working Party Kick-off

  2. Rationale • Bornhuetter-Ferguson is one of the most heavily relied upon reserving methods • Can be thought of as a credibility weighted estimate of chain-ladder indication and initial expected losses • Much written about chain-ladder method, relatively little about initial expected losses

  3. Rationale (continued) • Seminal paper for the method simply says that if the “expected loss ratio cannot be selected with much accuracy, a high ratio should be used.” • Goal of this working party is to publish a paper to provide guidance for practitioners and education for students

  4. Working Party Scope • Do not intend to engage in primary research • Want to leverage initial expected loss approaches already in use, whether documented or not • Many smart people using Bornhuetter-Ferguson method, probably many very good IEL approaches already exist

  5. Examples of Approaches #1 IEL = initial expected loss ratio x earned premium initial expected loss ratio can come from: -industry loss ratios or other benchmarks -company pricing assumptions -projected prior year loss ratios adjusted for price/trend

  6. Examples of Approaches #2 IEL = initial expected loss cost x number of exposures initial expected loss cost can come from: -industry loss costs or other benchmarks -prior year loss costs adjusted for trend

  7. BF IEL Working Party Timetable

  8. BF IEL Working Party Timetable

  9. BF IEL Working Party • Will have two classes of working party members • ‘Core’ members will participate in all tasks • ‘Team’ members will be asked to help identify literature, survey their workplaces, write summaries of their findings, and help review the final paper • Purpose is to keep number of members actually doing the writing to a manageable size • Also, people who don’t want to commit too much time can participate

  10. BF IEL Working Party • Looking for about 10 ‘Core’ members and about 20 ‘Team’ members, although all who express interest will be considered • Ideally, members would represent a broad cross-section of professional types

  11. BF IEL Working Party • Questions?

More Related