Receive antenna performance comparison l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 8

Receive Antenna Performance Comparison PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 124 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Receive Antenna Performance Comparison. Receive Antenna Monitoring. The receive antenna was installed in its permanent location inside the chamber

Download Presentation

Receive Antenna Performance Comparison

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Receive antenna performance comparison l.jpg

Receive Antenna Performance Comparison


Receive antenna monitoring l.jpg

Receive Antenna Monitoring

  • The receive antenna was installed in its permanent location inside the chamber

  • A spectrum analyzer was used to monitor the receive antenna, the frequency span set to zero, and the sweep time equal to the time of one full paddle revolution

  • A known signal was injected into the chamber (this was the same frequency and power as was used during the calibration) and verified with a directional coupler and power meter

  • The paddlewheel was rotated continuously while the spectrum analyzer took one sweep


Receive calculations l.jpg

Receive Calculations

  • A calculation of the field strength was made from the peak power sampled across one tuner rotation using the equation below:


Comparison with e field probe l.jpg

Comparison with E-field probe

  • The field strength calculated from the peak receive antenna was then compared against the average of the nine peak e-field probe resultants taken during the chamber calibration at that frequency, and a dB delta between the two calculated and shown in the graph below

  • If the calculated field strength from the receive antenna was lower than the average peak resultant measured, then it is indicated by a negative number, if it was higher, the number is positive

  • Multiple receive antennas were used to create the comparison in the graphs below


Antenna selection l.jpg

Antenna Selection

  • Using the data above it was determined the antennas were in general a worst case style of measurement. The only exception being the 400 MHz – 1 GHz range.

  • The discone antenna demonstrated a closer match to the isotropic probe readings, and it was therefore decided to use the discone antenna for testing.

  • In all cases, the dB delta of the peaks seen above the e-field probe were within the total error tolerances of the measurement equipment


Receive antenna uniformity l.jpg

Receive Antenna Uniformity

  • The receive antenna calculated peak field was integrated into the uniformity measurements for an evaluation of the impact it will have on the uniformity, for a total of ten measurement points for the uniformity

  • The results are shown in the graph below


  • Login