1 / 19

AP Human Geography

Tracing Linguistic Diversification. Diffusion of languageLong been charted through the analysis of sound shifts.Backward reconstruction of languages is called deep reconstruction.Find some vocabulary of an extinct language and try to go backward.More than 200 years ago, William Jones discovered

paxton
Download Presentation

AP Human Geography

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. AP Human Geography Chapter 9: The Diffusion of Language

    2. Tracing Linguistic Diversification Diffusion of language Long been charted through the analysis of sound shifts. Backward reconstruction of languages is called deep reconstruction. Find some vocabulary of an extinct language and try to go backward. More than 200 years ago, William Jones discovered ancient Sanskrit bore a striking resemblance to ancient Greek and Latin. Jacob Grimm pointed out related languages have similar, but not identical consonants.

    3. Tracing Linguistic Diversification From Jones and Grimm came the linguistic hypothesis that postulated the existence of an ancestral (Proto) Indo-European language. This concept had major implications that created major research tasks. The vocabulary of the postulated source language must be reconstructed. The hearth of source of this language from which it spread must be located . The routes of diffusion should be traced. The ways of life of those who spoke and spread this language should be established.

    4. The Language Tree Divergence First scholar to compare the world’s language family to the branches of a tree was August Schleicher. Differentiation in language over time and space. Suggested the basic process of language formation is language divergence. Language branched into dialects. Dialects became isolated and then became discrete languages. Language tree model remains central to language research (figure 9-1).

    5. The Language Tree Convergence Human mobility complicates language study. Languages also spread by relocation diffusion. Long-isolated languages making contact - language convergence. Can make research unreliable. Replacement - Language replacement - replacement of modification of language by stronger invaders of a less advanced people. - Goes on today. - No reason to believe it has not happened ever since humans began to use language. - Hungarian is completely surrounded by Indo-European languages. - What Proto-language gave rise to the Basque language is unknown.

    6. Theories of Language Diffusion Roots: Proto-language had words for certain landforms and other features of the landscape. More specifically some contained words for certain types of vegetation - trees, grass, etc. Such information helps indicate the environment in which a language may have developed. Conquest Theory: - Some believed the Proto-Indo-European language originated somewhere north of the Black Sea in the vast steppes of Ukraine and Russia. - The language then spread west judging by the sound shifts. - More than 5000 years ago, these people used horses, developed the wheel, and traded widely.

    7. Theories of Language of Diffusion Agriculture Theory Some felt the spread of agriculture, not conquest, diffused the Proto-Indo-European language through Europe. Postulated the source area as the hilly and mountainous terrain Anatolia in Turkey. Proto-Indo-European language has few words for plains but many for high and low mountains, valleys, mountain streams, rapids, lakes, and other high-relief landforms. Language also has words for trees, and animals that never lived on the plains. The realm’s leading hearth of agricultural innovation lay in nearby Mesopotamia.

    8. Theories of Language Diffusion Support for the Theory Research proved the existence of distance decay in the geographic pattern. Certain genes become steadily less common as one moved north and west. Farming in Anatolia led to overpopulation, which led to outmigration. Farming peoples of Anatolia migrated in a slow moving wave into Europe. Nonfarming societies held out, and their languages remained unchanged.

    9. Theories of Language Diffusion Drawbacks of the theory. Anatolian region is not ideal for farming. Some believe the proto languages was first carried eastward into Southwest Asia, then across the Russian-Ukrainian plains and on into the Balkans (figure 9-2). May be some truth in both hypotheses (figure 9-3). An eastward diffusion must have occurred because of relationships between Sanskrit and ancient Latin and Greek.

    10. The Search for the Superfamily Language development and divergence have been occurring for 90,000 or more years (figure 9-4). Renfrew proposed three agricultural hearths gave rise to language families (figure 9-5). Russian scholars have long been in the forefront of research on ancient languages. Vladislav Illich-Svitych and Ahron Dolgopolsky Studied independently of each other Came to similar conclusions Established the core of a pre-proto-European language named Nostratic.

    11. The Search for the Superfamily Nostratic Vocabulary revealed much about the people speaking it. No names for domestic plants or animals. People were hunters and gatherer, not farmers. May date back 14,000 years. Believed to be the ancestral language for many other languages Nostratic links widely separated languages. Some scholars have suggested that Nostratic is a direct successor of a proto-world.

    12. Diffusion to the Pacific and the Americas Pacific diffusion Polynesians reached New Zealand about 1000 years ago. Australia peopled between 50,000 and 60,000 years ago. New Guinea populated before Australia. Diffusion of people and their languages into the Pacific north of Indonesia and New Guinea. Began in Coastal China. Farming was well established. Languages had undergone several transitions.

    13. Diffusion to the Pacific and the Americas Austronesian language arose in Asia. Had many words for rice, field, farm, water buffalo, etc. Reached Taiwan about 6000 years ago. Malay-Polynesian: forerunner of a large number of languages. Speed of diffusion and simultaneous divergence of languages in remarkable considering the water-fragmented nature of the Pacific realm. The whole eastern region of Polynesia was settled within several centuries (figure 9-6). Much remains to be learned about the reasons behind the complexity of the Pacific.

    14. Diffusion to the Pacific and the Americas Diffusion in the Americas The Americas are dominated by Indo-European languages. Pre-Columbian populations had not gone beyond 40 million at the highest speculation. As many as 200 indigenous language families have been identified. Appears first American languages diverged into the most intricately divided branch of the language tree- if one accepts the Bering land-bridge hypothesis.

    15. Diffusion to the Pacific and the Americas The Greenberg Hypothesis Proposed there are only three families of indigenous American languages. Each corresponds to a major wave of migration from Asia (figure 9-7). Amerind, the superfamily, is the most widely distributed. Na-Dene, spoken by indigenous people in northwest Canada and part of Alaska. Eskimo-Aleut: is still concentrated along Arctic and near-Arctic shores.

    16. Diffusion to the Pacific and the Americas Many linguists are disagreeing with Greenberg and feel he did not follow proper procedure of reconstruction. Hypothesis implies a period longer than the 12,000 to 13,000 year-ago immigration into the Americas. Archaeological dating in Pennsylvania (16,000 b.p.) and Chile (tentatively 33,000 b.p.). May lend credibility to Greenberg’s hypothesis, if proved beyond a doubt. May mean the first wave came across the Bering Strait more than 40,000 years ago. Dental data gathered by Christy Turner conclude that three waves of immigration took place over a longer period than 12,000 years.

    17. Diffusion to the Pacific and the Americas The continuing controversy: Most linguists still doubt the three wave notion. There still remain many gaps in our knowledge. Influences on individual languages: - Critical influences of diffusion on individual tongues. - Speakers on non-written languages will not retain the same language very long if contact with one another is lost. - Three critical components have influenced the world’s linguistic mosaic.

    18. Influences on Individual Languages Literacy: texts are the primary means by which language cane become stabilized. Technology: influences both production of written texts and interaction of distant peoples. Political organization: key because it affects both what people have access to and which areas are in close contact with one another. Discussion of above three components. Printing press and the rise of national states. Printing press Invented in 1588, in Germany Allowed for unprecedented production of texts Luther Bible for German and King James Bible for English.

    19. Influences on Individual Languages Rise of national states Had a strong interest in creating a more integrated state territory. Brought people together and exposed them to common linguistic influences. Established networks of communication and interaction.

More Related