BRAZIL’S SOYBEAN PRODUCTION POTENTIAL AND COMPETITIVE POSITION VS. U.S.
Download
1 / 58

BRAZIL S SOYBEAN PRODUCTION POTENTIAL AND COMPETITIVE POSITION VS. U.S. Dr. Robert Wisner Iowa State University - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 149 Views
  • Uploaded on

BRAZIL’S SOYBEAN PRODUCTION POTENTIAL AND COMPETITIVE POSITION VS. U.S. Dr. Robert Wisner Iowa State University. SOURCES OF INFORMATION. 4 farms in three states 2 railroad companies 1 barge company 2 truck firms 1 major grain company 1 soybean processor 1 wet corn miller

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'BRAZIL S SOYBEAN PRODUCTION POTENTIAL AND COMPETITIVE POSITION VS. U.S. Dr. Robert Wisner Iowa State University' - parson


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg
BRAZIL’S SOYBEAN PRODUCTION POTENTIAL AND COMPETITIVE POSITION VS. U.S.Dr. Robert WisnerIowa State University


Slide2 l.jpg

SOURCES OF INFORMATION POSITION VS. U.S.

4 farms in three states

2 railroad companies

1 barge company

2 truck firms

1 major grain company

1 soybean processor

1 wet corn miller

1 export elevator

1 port authority

2 country elevators

3 soybean seed producers

3 livestock producers

1 new farm storage facility


Slide3 l.jpg

HISTORY POSITION VS. U.S.

  • 1971 U.S. devalues dollar

  • 1971-72 USSR buys huge amounts of U.S. grain

  • 1972-73 harsh El Nino reduces Peruvian fish meal

  • 1973 U.S. food companies, livestock feeders and consumers raise fears of running out of soy products

  • June, 1973, President Nixon embargos soybean and soymeal exports

  • 1973-74 soy importers buy land in Brazil to grow soybeans


Brazil soybean production l.jpg
BRAZIL SOYBEAN PRODUCTION POSITION VS. U.S.

Mil. TonsMil. Bu.

1973 5.0 184

2000 34.2 1,259

2002 43.5 1,600

USDA Proj. 2003 48.0 1,766


Slide6 l.jpg

Brazil’s Cerrados POSITION VS. U.S.

  • Land purchase prices: $100/Acre or less plus clearing costs

  • Quality varies, buyer beware

  • Web site for real estate:http://www.AgBrazil.com/brazil_s_agriculture_frontier.htm


Crops raised in cerrados l.jpg
Crops Raised in Cerrados POSITION VS. U.S.

  • Soybeans

  • Wheat

  • Rice

  • Sugar cane

  • Cotton

  • Corn

  • Coffee

  • Pasture


Brazil s cerrados l.jpg
Brazil’s Cerrados POSITION VS. U.S.

  • Soil types: sandy to sandy loam

  • Aluminum content: 0.05 to 0.06

  • Requires about 1.6 tons of lime/A.

  • Avg. annual rainfall: 35 to 80 inches, depending on the location

  • Avg. temperature: 73 F. range: 63-90

  • Irrigation water available

  • Double/triple cropping possible


Rate of expansion in south american soybean production l.jpg
Rate of Expansion in South American Soybean production POSITION VS. U.S.

  • Brazil: 1993-1999 = 55 mil. bu./year

  • Argentina:1993-1999 = 51 mil. bu./year

  • Projected 2000-01 expansions:

    • Brazil +74 mil. bu.

    • Argentina +103 mil bu.

    • Other small expansions in Bolivia, Paraguay, Uraguay


Brazil corn l.jpg
Brazil Corn POSITION VS. U.S.

  • Brazil is a major corn grower

  • Brazil exports no corn in most years

  • Reason:

  • Transport costs nearly equal price of corn

    • What it would take for Brazil to export corn: approximate doubling of corn yields


Slide16 l.jpg

Estimated Costs of Producing Soybeans, Iowa & Brazil POSITION VS. U.S.,

2000

Cost per acre

Cost per bushel

Mato

Matto

Non-land costs

Iowa

Paran

á

Grosso

Iowa

Paran

á

Grosso

Seed +

innoculant

$ 18.00

$10.00

$10.00

$0.36

$0.22

$0.20

Fertilizer & lime

27.30

38.00

47.00

0.55

0.84

0.94

Labor

19.60

10.00

10.00

0.39

0.22

0.20

Chemicals

30.00

35.00

24.40

0.60

0.78

0.49

Crop insurance

3.00

0.00

0.00

0.06

0.00

0.00

Interest

5.90

6.48

6.92

0.12

0.14

0.14

Machinery

43.19

25.00

33.85

0.86

0.56

0.68

Miscellaneous

8.00

8.00

9.00

0.16

0.18

0.18

Sub-total

$154.99

$132.48

$141.17

$3.10

$2.94

$2.82

Land

140.00

42.00

32.00

2.80

0.93

0.64

Total

$294.99

$174.48

$173.17

$5.90

$3.87

$3.47

Normal yields

50

45

50



Slide18 l.jpg

Typical dirt road in Brazil during the beginning of the dry season.

Brazil Cerrados

Top Soil 120 ft


Slide19 l.jpg

Cotton planted season.

on Cerrados


Slide20 l.jpg

Newly Cleared Land In Brazil season.

Planted to Upland Rice



Slide34 l.jpg

Major waterway systems season.

Major waterway systems






Slide48 l.jpg

Railroads season.

1. Are in bad condition

a. different rail gauges

b. less than 300 miles of new and upgraded

lines

c. trains derail regularly on old rail

2. Ferronorte (Soy Railroad) purchased 50 cutting edge technology locomotives and 700 new 105-ton aluminum covered hopper cars

3. Derailments essentially destroy aluminum cars

4. Major grain company buying 40 smaller hoppers

5. Very limited grain loading facilities on the new rail


Slide49 l.jpg

Railroads - cont’d season.

6. New loading facilities unlikely until all new rail completed

7. Seasonal grain movements unlikely to support new railroads

8. Directly serve only small areas

9. Grain carrying capacity likely to increase but at a very modest rate


Conclusions l.jpg
Conclusions season.

  • Brazil has large and clear cost advantage in soybean production

  • Brazil soybean transport costs range from 100% to 400% higher than U.S. transport costs

  • Brazil land clearing and soy production will likely continue at the historical rate

  • Brazil’s transportation investments will be limited by:

  • a. capital shortages

  • b. environmental and social problems

  • c. politics


Alternatives for u s agriculture l.jpg
Alternatives for U.S. Agriculture season.

  • Reduce marketing costs

    • Increased use of semi trucks

    • Bypass high cost elevators

  • Reduce cost of producing U.S. soybeans through lower land costs

  • Emphasize value added products


  • Slide58 l.jpg

    Y season.and justice for all

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Many materials can be made available in alternative formats for ADA clients. To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 202-720-5964.

    Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Stanley R. Johnson, director, Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa.


    ad