1 / 8

Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities

Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities. Session 4: Final (Update) Evaluation. Presentation Structure. Context Regulation Commission Guidance Final Evaluation in Ireland Organisation Focus Final Evaluation in Czech Republic. Context. Article 42(4) of 1260/1999

pamelahenderson
Download Presentation

Evaluation Seminar Czech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation SeminarCzech Republic CSF and OP Managing Authorities Session 4: Final (Update) Evaluation

  2. Presentation Structure • Context • Regulation • Commission Guidance • Final Evaluation in Ireland • Organisation • Focus • Final Evaluation in Czech Republic

  3. Context • Article 42(4) of 1260/1999 • Requires mid-term evaluation update by end 2005 • At OP and CSF level • Commission guidance • Working Paper issued • Also separate paper on ESF

  4. Final Evaluation in Ireland • Process has not yet started • Evaluation Unit to prepare paper • Evaluation will be a “light touch” • Will cover EU-funded measures (CSF) • Update mte analysis to end 2004 • Main issues • Progress to end 2004 (1st 5 years) • Update on developments since mte • Focus on impacts or likely impacts

  5. Final Evaluation in Ireland • Process likely to start in H2 2005 • OP evaluations followed by CSF • Some may be carried out internally • Will try to focus on issues relevant to post 2006 • Regional competitiveness and employment objective

  6. Final Evaluation - Czech Republic • Commission sees 2004 to 2006 as opportunity to develop evaluation capacity • Recommends that new MS should • Undertake update of progress in implementation of programes • Focus on outputs/results to date • Problems • Data only available for 1 year • Limited outputs and results • Trend analysis difficult

  7. Final Evaluation in Czech Republic • Might be better to focus on other issues • Management/implementation • Indicator quality • Project selection • Targeting • Cost developments/project management • Similar to pre mid-term evaluation in Ireland

  8. Final Evaluation in Czech Republic • Thematic approach • Issues which affect more than 1 programme • Links between programmes • Integration of horizontal principles • Keep focus on post 2007 period • evaluation should assist preparations • or help management of future OPs

More Related