1 / 1

Effect of Soil Organic Carbon Level on the Erodibility of a U.S. Piedmont Soil

Effect of Soil Organic Carbon Level on the Erodibility of a U.S. Piedmont Soil Jordan Sedlock 1 , Charles Raczkowski 1 , Gudigopuram B. Reddy 1 , Warren Busscher 2 , Alan Franzluebbers 3 & Philip Bauer 2 ,

page
Download Presentation

Effect of Soil Organic Carbon Level on the Erodibility of a U.S. Piedmont Soil

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effect of Soil Organic Carbon Level on the Erodibility of a U.S. Piedmont Soil Jordan Sedlock1, Charles Raczkowski1, Gudigopuram B. Reddy1, Warren Busscher2, Alan Franzluebbers3 & Philip Bauer2, (1)N.C. A&T State University (2)USDA-ARS, Florence, SC (3)USDA-ARS, Watkinsville, GA Materials & Methods Introduction Intensive soil cultivation and high soil erosion has impoverished levels of soil organic carbon (SOC) in the southeastern U.S. Piedmont region. Sound soil management practices that build SOC levels are needed to reduce soil erodibility and restore soil quality. Objective We studied the relationship of SOC content and soil erodibility using a Mecklenburg sandy clay loam (fine mixed, active, thermic, UlticHapludalfs) soil that had been managed for 7-years using key agronomic practices, including winter cover cropping, the application of compost and the use of no tillage. A Norton rainfall simulator was used to apply 75 mm hr-1 intensity rain for 1.5 h on a 1 m2 soil pan adjusted to a 9% gradient. Increasing SOC content increased the stability of soil aggregates and decreased surface seal formation rate, runoff, and soil loss. The regression analysis showed a 14% decrease in soil erodibility with a 1% increase in soil carbon (figure above) Results & Discussion Materials & Methods DT, 1.2% C DTB, 1.6% C NTB, 2.7% C NT, 2.2% C Relative to other treatments, the gradual increase of NTB runoff (figure below) and soil loss figure above) indicates a more structurally stable soil surface and a lower rate of surface seal formation. †For each variable, treatment means having the same letter in common are not significantly different at the 5% significant level as indicated by Fisher’s Protected LSD test. Total runoff and total soil loss was lowest in NTB and highest in DT. Relative to DT, NTB runoff was 27% less and soil loss was 55% less. The soil used was collected in June 2010 from the upper 7.5 cm of treatments (see photos above) in a field study that began in 2003: (i) no tillage summer vegetable planting (NT), (ii) fall applied poultry hatchery compost (11 Mg/ha) + winter rye-clover cover crop + no tillage summer vegetable planting (NTB), (iii) summer vegetable planting after disk tillage (DT) and, (iv) fall applied poultry hatchery compost (11 Mg/ha)+ winter rye-clover cover crop + summer vegetable planting after disk tillage (DTB). Contact Information Charles W. Raczkowski Tel 336 334 7779 Email: raczkowc@ncat.edu Time, min

More Related