Comparison of Soil Organic
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 19

Comparison of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Between Residential Turf Grass & Native Soil PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 105 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

Comparison of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Between Residential Turf Grass & Native Soil. Richard V. Pouyat, Ian D. Yesilonis, and Nancy E. Golubiewski. Residential: 40% of urban areas (Nowak et al. 1996) 40 million acres of lawn in conterminous USA (Milesi et al., 2005)

Download Presentation

Comparison of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Between Residential Turf Grass & Native Soil

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

Comparison of Soil Organic

Carbon Stocks Between

Residential Turf Grass & Native Soil

Richard V. Pouyat, Ian D. Yesilonis, and Nancy E. Golubiewski


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

  • Residential: 40% of urban areas (Nowak et al. 1996)

  • 40 million acres of lawn in conterminous USA (Milesi et al., 2005)

  • 3 times more than acreage of largest irrigated crop (corn)


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

AREA (x10

m

)

C Density (kg m

) Soil C (x10

g)

LIFE ZONE

AREA (x10

m

)

C Density (kg m

) Soil C (x10

g)

12

2

2

15

12

2

2

15

Temperate forest

-

warm

7.1

Temperate forest

-

warm

8.6

7.1

61.1

-

Temperate forest

-

cool

3.4

12.7

43.2

Cool temperate steppe

9.0

13.3

119.7

Temperate thorn steppe

3.9

7.6

29.6

Warm desert

14.0

1.4

19.6

Wetlands

2.8

72.3

202.4

-

Boreal forest

-

wet

6.9

19.3

133.2

Cultivated land

21.2

7.9

167.5

14.4

?

?

Residential turf grass

1.3 +

7.7

10.0

Urban land

TOTAL WORLD

1500(±20%)

Adapted from Post et al. (1982) and Schlesinger and Andrews (2000)

*Milesi et al. 2005


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

SIMILARITY?

Baltimore

Phoenix


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

  • URBAN LAND USE CHANGE?:

  • Disturbance (initial, post-develop.)-

  • SOC

  • Introduction of impervious surfaces

  • SOC- low, very slow change

  • Introduction of horticultural management (supplements)- SOC

  • Environmental change (biophysical)- SOC


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

TURFGRASS MAINTENANCE

  • $10.4 billion in USA

  • Range of fertilizer rates:

    • Golf courses, athletic fields—490 kg ha-1 yr-1

    • Residential lawns—50-145 kg ha-1 yr-1

  • 16 million kg pesticides applied yr-1(Aspelin, 1997)

  • Irrigation use?


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

Boreal

Cool Temperate Steppe

Cool Tropical Forest

Moist Tropical Forest

Warm Temperate Forest

Warm Desert

20

Agricultural Conversion

Urban Conversion

Cd

Urban Range at Equilibrium

Global Range at Equilibrium

1.4

Time

Edaphic Cultivation Urban

Turf grass?

Milesi et al., 2005

Pouyat et al. (2001) & Pouyat et al. (2003)


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

  • OBJECTIVES:

  • Compare residential turf grass vs. native SOC in Baltimore, MD and Denver, CO areas

    • Climatologically distinct regions

    • Compare residential turf grass vs. native cover types (0.2 and 1 m depth)

    • Field collected data, NRCS Soil database, and data from literature


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

  • Estimate net effect of urban land-use change on SOC densities in both metropolitan areas

    • Calculate SOC densities on area weight basis (including impervious areas)

    • Pre-urban, agriculture, and post-urban landscapes


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

  • EXPECTED RESULTS:

  • SOC densities of native soils will differ more than for residential soils

  • 2. Net differences between pre- and post-urban SOC densities will be positive in arid shortgrass steppe (Denver) and negative in mid-Atlantic hardwood deciduous forest (Baltimore)


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

1 m DEPTH SOIL CORES

NRCS Soil Characterization Database

  • 605 pedons northeastern and north central USA

  • Data required (bulk density, coarse fragments, C fraction, horizon thickness)

  • 0-20 cm, 0-1 m, proportion of C to 1 m depth occurring in surface 20 cm

  • Extrapolated to 1 m only if reached C horizon


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

BALTIMORE UFORE PLOTS

Birdsey (1992)

n=19

n=5

n=7

n=19

NRCS DATA


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

CUB HILL PLOTS

Birdsey (1992)

n=6

n=7

n=8


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

DENVER METROPOLITAN AREA

n=19

n=3

n=2

n=5

n=3

Schimel et al. (1985)

NRCS

Adapted from Galubiewski (2006)


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

COMPARISON OF RESIDENTIAL AREAS

n=26

n=13


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

COMPARISON OF NATIVE SOILS

?

n=7

n=19


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

NET Change?

-4.1 (+2.6)

+1.17

*includes impervious surfaces (3.3 kg m-2)


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

CONCLUSIONS

  • Residential soils differ less than native soils in SOC densities

  • Residential soils in Denver significantly higher than native short grass (Baltimore less clear)

  • Net change Denver (increase SOC), Baltimore (+ or – change?)

  • Turf grass potential to sequester C in soil (BUT, entire budget required)


Comparison of soil organic carbon stocks between residential turf grass native soil

LIFE ZONE

AREA C Density Soil

C

LIFE ZONE

AREA C Density Soil

C

(x10

m2)

(kg m

)

(x10

g)

10

-

2

14

(x10

10

(kg m

-

2

)

(x10

14

g)

Northeast Forest*

20.81

16.2

33.7

Northeast Forest*

16.2

Northeast Cropland*

-

6.0

-

Northeast Cropland*

-

6.0

-

Mid

-

Atlantic Forest*

20.29

11.2

22.7

Mid

-

Atlantic Forest*

20.29

11.2

Mid

-

Atlantic

Cropland*

-

4.2

-

Mid

-

Atlantic

Cropland*

-

4.2

-

Forest*

34.22

7.7

Southeast

26.3

-

-

Southeast

Cropland*

2.6

Urban (residential)

6.35

14.4 (

±

1.2)

9.84

6.35

±

1.2)

9.84

7.7 (±0.2)***

USA Urban (total)

30.06**

USA Urban (total)

30.06

23.15

USA (total)

915.9

6.8 (?)

619.15

USA (total)

915.9

6.8 (?)

***Pouyat et al. (2006)

*

Birdsey

(1992)

*

Birdsey

(1992)

**Nowak et al. (1996)


  • Login