Great Lakes Perspective
1 / 23

Sam Speck - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Updated On :

Great Lakes Perspective Samuel W. Speck Chair, Water Management Working Group Council of Great Lakes Governors Chair, Great Lakes Commission Director, Ohio Dept of Natural Resources Waves of Change: Examining the Role of States in Emerging Ocean Policy NGA Conference September 4, 2003

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Sam Speck' - oshin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Slide1 l.jpg

Great Lakes Perspective

Samuel W. Speck

Chair, Water Management Working Group Council of Great Lakes Governors

Chair, Great Lakes Commission

Director, Ohio Dept of Natural Resources

Waves of Change: Examining the Role of States in Emerging Ocean Policy

NGA Conference

September 4, 2003

Great lakes l.jpg
Great Lakes

  • Largest system of fresh water on the earth

  • 20% of world’s supply of fresh surface water; 90% of United States’ supply

  • 6 quadrillion gallons of water over 94,000 square miles of lake surface

  • Basis for multi-billion dollar industries in every state and province

  • Intensive, multiple use under a complex multi-jurisdictional management structure

  • 895 billion gallons withdrawn/used in-stream daily; (59 billion excluding hydroelectric); 2.64 billion consumed

Slide4 l.jpg

Slide5 l.jpg

Great Lakes Commission provinces

  • Promotes the informed use, management and protection of the water and related natural resources of the Great Lakes Basin and St. Lawrence River

  • Addresses resource management, environmental protection, transportation and sustainable economic development issues

  • Functions are information sharing, policy research and development, and advocacy

Slide6 l.jpg

  • Non-partisan partnership of provinces

    eight Great Lakes Governors

  • Formed in 1983

  • Premiers of Ontario and Quebec

    are associate members

  • Mission is to encourage and facilitate

    environmentally responsible economic growth

Great lakes charter l.jpg
Great Lakes Charter provinces

  • 1985 Good-faith agreement between Great Lakes Governors and Premiers

  • Framework for protecting Basin waters from large scale diversions and consumptive uses

  • Establishment of water management principles

Factors leading to the annex to the great lakes charter in 2001 l.jpg
Factors Leading to the Annex to the Great Lakes Charter in 2001

  • 1986 U.S. federal statute (WRDA)

    - Prohibits diversions unless approved by

    Governors of all Great Lakes States

    - Allows veto without standards

    - Regulates first drop (no threshold)

    - Ontario & Quebec not subject to U.S.

    federal law

    - In-basin consumptive uses not incl

    - Question whether ground water incl

  • 1998 Nova Group proposal

  • 1999 Recurring lower lake levels

October 1999 governors and premiers commitment l.jpg
October 1999 2001Governors and Premiers Commitment

  • Develop new agreement

  • Develop new common standard for water removal based upon protection of the water resources

  • Secure funds to develop a better base of water use data

Governors and premiers principles for water management regime l.jpg
Governors and Premiers Principles for Water Management Regime

  • Protect the resource

  • Be durable

  • Be simple

  • Be efficient

  • Retain authority in the Basin

Great lakes charter annex l.jpg
Great Lakes Charter Annex Regime

  • Signed June 18, 2001

  • In contrast to WRDA the Annex would:

    - Include Ontario and Quebec

    - Include in-basin consumptive uses

    - Include ground water

    - Commit to improve the sources & applications

    of scientific information re

    management of Basin waters

Annex directives l.jpg
Annex Directives Regime

  • New decision making standard

  • New set of binding agreements

  • Decision support system

  • Public participation

  • Further commitments

    Improve sources & applications of scientific information, including role of ground water

Draft decision making framework l.jpg
Draft Decision Making Framework Regime

  • Regional review by State-Provincial body for large diversion and consumptive use proposals

  • Individual State or Provincial review for smaller diversion and consumptive use proposals

Annex implementation l.jpg
Annex Implementation Regime

  • June 2004 - timeline to develop agreement

  • State-Provincial agreement

  • State legislation such as approval of an interstate compact

  • Provincial legislation

Great lakes priorities l.jpg
Great Lakes Priorities Regime

  • March 1, 2001 Congressional Great Lakes Task Force request to Governors

  • Common set of priorities for Great Lakes restoration

  • CGLG Priorities Task Force

  • April 2003 GAO Great Lakes Report

  • S 1398 and HR 2720

Great lakes priorities16 l.jpg
Great Lakes Priorities Regime

  • Leadership role of Great Lakes Governors and Premiers is key to establishing policy priorities for a comprehensive restoration plan

  • Priorities will reflect broad goals such as protection of human health, restoration of habitat, control of invasive species

Summary l.jpg
Summary Regime

  • Great Lakes Basin Commission – compact

  • Council of Great Lakes Governors – partnership

    Great Lakes Charter – good-faith agreement

    Great Lakes Charter Annex – good-faith agreement that calls for binding agreements which are being developed

    Great Lakes Priorities Task Force – partnership

  • WRDA – U.S. federal law

Regional management l.jpg
Regional Management Regime

Operationalize Regional Agreements

  • Compact

  • Good-faith agreement

  • U.S. federal law

  • Currently working towards meeting intent of the Annex which calls for binding agreements

Regional management19 l.jpg
Regional Management Regime

Biggest Challenges

  • Resolving legal issues

  • Deriving consensus among highly diverse interests

  • Developing a scientific basis for decision making

  • Bridging different histories of water regulations within the respective jurisdictions

Regional management20 l.jpg
Regional Management Regime

What Could Be Done Differently?

  • Better monitoring and research to provide a scientific basis for decision making

  • Better coordination, definition of objectives, and measurement of results among existing programs (GAO Great Lakes Report)

Regional management21 l.jpg
Regional Management Regime

Lessons Learned

  • Sustainability of the resource is the critical bridge for bringing people together

  • Improvement in scientific information is needed for good decision making and setting standards

  • Effective management of water resources in the Great Lakes Basin requires an international partnership

  • Bridging group such as the Great Lakes Commission is necessary to bring diverse interests together

Regional management22 l.jpg
Regional Management Regime

What Can the Federal Government/Ocean Commission Do?

  • Recognize the key role of the States and Governors

  • Recognize the Great Lakes as part of the focus of our national ocean policy

  • Promote regional, watershed-based approach to policy development

  • Ensure the Great Lakes receive full and equitable share of federal support and funding

Slide23 l.jpg

“If there is magic on this planet, it is contained Regime

in water.” ~ Loren Eiseley, The Flow of the River