1 / 11

September 17-20, EMIN - 2009

On microscopic description of the gamma-ray strength functions S. Kamerdzhiev , D. Voitenkov Institute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk , Russia. September 17-20, EMIN - 2009. photoabsorption. g -decay.

osgood
Download Presentation

September 17-20, EMIN - 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. On microscopic description of the gamma-ray strengthfunctionsS. Kamerdzhiev, D. VoitenkovInstitute of Physics and Power Engineering, Obninsk, Russia September 17-20, EMIN - 2009

  2. photoabsorption g-decay • 1. PSF describes energy distribution of photon emission between “highly-excited” states Motivation Main restrictions: • Energies below  10 MeV • Low spins PDR

  3. 2. At present there are huge number of experimental data for the transition between excited states and moment values in the excited states. • Our direct aim: to understand what gives the modern microscopic many-body theory in this field and to compare with the standard QRPA. The microscopic description is important for neutron-rich nuclei, where phenomenological approaches are questionable

  4. Extended Theory of Finite Fermi Systems (ETFFS) 1. J. Speth, E. Werner, W. Wild, Phys. Rep. 33 (1977) 127 – 208. 2. S. Kamerdzhiev, J. Speth, G. Tertychny, Phys. Rep. 393 (2004) 1– 86. [1], [2] are going beyond the standard RPA and QRPA, namely: Ref. [1] describes transitions between excited states and moment values in excited states. Ref. [2] accounts for the quasiparticle-phonon coupling and more complex configurations than (Q)RPA ones.

  5. Magic nuclei V V 1 1 2 2 + S S’ S’ S 3 3 The case of moment in the excited state corresponds to S=S’, ω=0. J. Speth, Z. Phys. 239 (1970) 249 P. Ring, J. Speth, Nucl. Phys. A235 (1974) 315 – 351 V and gs are calculated within the RPA

  6. New physics: 1. RPA ETFFS 2. Ground state correlations (GSC) in the integral (not in the gs!) “backward going graphs”

  7. Non-magic nuclei + + Pairing gap Δ≠0 + + + + +

  8. Comparison with the QRPA [V. Yu. Ponamarev, Ch. Stoyanov, N. Tsoneva, M. Grinberg, Nucl. Phys. A 635 (1988) 470 – 483.]

  9. Calculation in 208Pb Approximations: (B-M model) Our preliminary results:

  10. Prospects • 1. Calculations without the above-mentioned approximations • 2. Coordinate representation • 3. New effects: M F F = where F + + M M S S’ V.A. Khodel, E.E. Saperstein, Phys. Rep. 1982

  11. Conclusion: • A new physics is appeared in nuclear spectroscopy and, therefore, in the gamma-ray function business

More Related