1 / 23

The Commission

The Commission. A key institution in the EU System. By Florence Di Bonaventura, Marianna Manoukian and Cédric Gosse-le-duc . 2010-2011. The commission. Appointment and composition Organisation Power resources Responsibilities The influence of the COM in the EU Conclusion.

ormand
Download Presentation

The Commission

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Commission A key institution in the EU System By Florence Di Bonaventura, Marianna Manoukian and Cédric Gosse-le-duc. 2010-2011

  2. The commission • Appointment and composition • Organisation • Power resources • Responsibilities • The influence of the COM in the EU • Conclusion

  3. The College of commissioners At the top of the commission: Commissioners • In charge of particular policy areas (portfolios) • Further to the Nice treaty: one commissioner for each member state as from 2005 and until an enlargement of 27 countries (after that: reduction) BUT NEVER happened because of the Irish ratification of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009

  4. Appointment procedure (1) • Before 1993: every four years by common accord within member states. • With Maastricht Treaty: strengthening of the link between the COM and EP • EP consultation for COM president and vote of confidence on the college-designate. • EP and COM: close alignment – five-year term. • With Amsterdam Treaty: • EP veto confirmed for the COM President appointment. • Potential veto of the President-designate over the national nominees for appointment to college. • With Nice Treaty: EC qualified majority for college/President nomination and appointment

  5. Appointment procedure (2) • With Lisbon Treaty: • The president: EC, according to EP elections, after consulting, by qualified majority suggests to the EP a candidate for COM presidency [shall BE ELECTED BY THE EP (by majority)] N.B.: if not, another canditate in one month (the same procedure). • The college: C+President: list of potential commissioners on Member states’ suggestions. After EP individual hearings and consent, appointment of the COM college by EC. • The High Representative: Appointment by EC+President (among commissioners) In practice: Change of application further to certain circumstances, many informal discussions between institutions and some political interferences related to the choice of the college.

  6. Impartiality and independance COM: Promoting the general interest of the EU  Commissioners: • Independent • Chosen on the ground of their general competence and European commitment • No instructions from any GVT or other institution, body, office or entity But in practice full impartiality doesn’t exist

  7. Characteristics of commissioners • No rules but former (senior) ministers. • Political balance reflecting the political composition of GVTs in Member States • Crucially: Commissioners = be pro-european and no link with extremist party Ex. Barroso II College: 13 Commissioners of Centre-right, 8 liberals and 6 centre-left

  8. The COM President • is the main representative dealing with EU institutions and outside bodies • gives the guidelines to his commissioners + to the COM • allocates Commissioners’ portfolios • may require Commissioners to resign • is directly responsible for overseeing some of the most important adm. Services (SG.,…). • may take on policy responsibilities of his own (usually with other commissioners)

  9. Cabinets Composition: • Small team of officials/support staff, with at least 3 nationalities and recruited from EU adm Tasks: • Gather information for their commissioner. • Liaise with other parts of the COM • Act as «unofficial advocate/protector » of the interests of their Commissioner’s country President’s cabinet: • Involved in brokering different views and interests amongst commissioners • Ensuring the COM is clear, coherent, cohesive and efficient

  10. The COM bureaucracy • Biggest element of the whole EU adm. Framework(in 2008: Commission’s staff just under 26.000: 20.000 employed in administration and 6.000 at senior policy-making). Permanent and temporary multinational staff  on a meritocratic way but not always (informal quota for a better representation among countries).

  11. Organisation • The Directorates General and other services • Commission: divided into organisational units (DG or Specialised services) • Various size and internal organisation of DGs & Specialised services Staff: 200-500 4-6 directorates Each divided into 3-4 units

  12. Organisation (2) • The hierarchical structure • Clear structure but with some complications due to: • Imperfect match between Commissioners’ portfolios & the responsibilities of services • Halfway position of Commissioners (= more than permanent secretaries, less than ministers) • Individual responsibility difficult to apply to Commissioners • Question: Should Commission be subject to collective responsibility ? (art. 234 TFUE) • YES: all Commission proposals & decisions made collectively • NO: to undertake ≠ tasks Commission is dependent on other EU actors

  13. Organisation (3) • Decision-making mechanisms • An initial draft is drawn up in the lead DG • Progress is monitored by the Secretariat General • The draft is passed upwards until reach the College of Commissioners (possibility to revise the draft) • Decision of the College of Commissioners: accept/reject/refer it back to the DG/defer ‼ all sort of variations are possible ‼ Ex: in case of urgency -› procedures to prevent logjams Other procedures are: • “written procedure” • When policy issues cut across the Commission’s administrative divisions

  14. Organisation (4) • Provision for liaison and coordination in the Commission: 4 procedures • At the level of the DGs: problem of horizontal coordination • The Secretariat General: charged with ensuring that proper communication & coordination takes place across the Commission • The ill-defined coordinating responsibility of the President of the Commission • The College of Commissioners: strong position to coordinate activity & to take a broad view of Commission affairs ‼ However, there is a feeling that the Commission continues to function in too compartmentalised a manner + insufficient attention on overall EU policy coherence Some of the problems are: • Commission’s rigid organisational framework • Too jealously guarded demarcation lines • Difficulty to look much beyond their own tasks (for Commissioners & senior officials)

  15. Organisation (5) • Power Resources Commission = political & administrative institution • Exclusive & non exclusive power of initiative • Neutrality • Present in all decision-making forums and at all stages • Access to EU’s policies information & needs • Smaller states look to the Commission for protection (most EU states = small)

  16. Key responsibilities • Proposer and developer of policies and legislation • Executive function • The guardian of the legal framework • External representative and negotiator • Mediator and conciliator • Promoter of the general interest

  17. Proposer and developer of policies and legislation • Policy initiation and development • Legislative initiation and development • Commission’s advisory committee network: • Experts  national experts and specialists • Consultative  private experts • Hybrid  combination national/private

  18. Executive functions • Rule-making powers • Similar to national executives • LT: legislative acts vs delegated/implementing • Few areas: more ‘policy-making’ • Management of EU finances • Supervisor / overseer of policy implementation • Comitology: implementing committees

  19. Guardian of legal framework • Non-compliance by M.S.: Since Maastricht: ECJ can specify financial penalty • Firm breaching EU law (restrictive practices and abuse of dominant market position): Comm. tries to reach an agreement O/W: fines • Firms breaching EU law on State aid • Potential breach on merger cases

  20. Other responsibilities • External representative and negotiator EU’s external trade relations and other agreements, High Representative is a member of the commission, key point of contact with non-member states, support for CSFP policies,… • Mediator and conciliator seeking agreement between competing interests • Promoter of general interest ‘conscience of the union’, finding a ‘general’ path to reconcile all interests. But what is ‘General Interest’?

  21. The varying influence of the Commission in the EU System • Circumstances favourable to the exercise of Commission leadership when: • it has strong & clear powers • QMV (qualified majority voting) applies in the Council • Weak control mechanisms • Uncertainty of information amongst the member states • Absence of strong conflicts in the Council & the EP • Possibility to exploiting differences between member states • Number of factors explaining why it has happened: • The increasing influence of the EC & EP • Loss of status • Defeats & failures • The growing importance of the use of “new modes of governance” • Notions of rolling back the responsibilities

  22. Concluding remarks • Commission = the most distinctive of the EU’s institutions • Extensive debates & different views • Two “polar” views • The intergovernmentalist • The supranationalist BUT: !! Commission remains central and vital to the whole EU system !!

  23. Thank you for your attention!

More Related