1 / 71

Anti-coagulants during Hemodialysis

Bancha Satirapoj , MD Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine. Anti-coagulants during Hemodialysis. Dialysis and Thrombosis. Kidney disease Inflammation E ndothelial injury Expression and activity of procoagulant factors

ordell
Download Presentation

Anti-coagulants during Hemodialysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bancha Satirapoj, MD Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine Phramongkutklao Hospital and College of Medicine Anti-coagulants during Hemodialysis

  2. Dialysis and Thrombosis • Kidney disease • Inflammation • Endothelial injury • Expression and activity of procoagulant factors • Dialysis process • Needle, blood line, blood flow • Platelet-platelet aggregation • Platelet-erythrocyte aggregation • Extrinsic and Intrinsic pathway activation

  3. IXa VIIIa Ca2+ PL Xa Va Ca2+ PL Coagulation cascade Intrinsic pathway Extrinsic pathway 1 Inhibition of one molecule of factor Xa can inhibit the generation of 50 molecules of thrombin** X Xa 50 IIa II Fibrin Fibrinogen *Rosenberg RD, et al. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1555–64. ** Wessler S, et al. ThromboDiathHaemorrh 1974;32:71–8. Clot

  4. Intrinsic pathway Extrinsic pathway PKK: HMWK ↓ KK XII XIIa Leukocyte activation Tissue factor Dialyzer surface VIIIaVIII VIIa VII XI XIa IX Ixa X Prothrombin Fibrinogen Fibrin LMWH Ca2+ HEPARIN Xa DTI Ca2+ XIII XIIIa V Va Thrombin Ca2+ Ca2+ Fibrin clot Citrate Adapted from Shen JI, et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 60(3):473-486

  5. ANTICOAGULATION IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

  6. Anticoagulation with RRT • Prevent clotting of the filter and reduction in membrane permeability • Adequate RRT • Blood loss in the clotted filter

  7. Unfractionated Heparin

  8. Unfractionated Heparin • Sulfate polysaccharide • 45 saccharide units • MW 10-16 kDa • Most common anticoagulant used for long-term hemodialysis potential surface of heparin

  9. Heparin action Stop the coagulation cascade and promoting anticoagulation

  10. UFH activity • Half-lifeof UFH = 1 hour in patients with kidney failure • Half-life of UFH = 30 minutes in patients with normal kidney function

  11. Dosing Schedules for UFH for Anticoagulation During Long-term Hemodialysis

  12. Dosing Schedules for UFH for Anticoagulation During Long-term Hemodialysis

  13. Dosing Schedules for UFH for Anticoagulation During Long-term Hemodialysis

  14. Dosing Schedules for UFH for Anticoagulation During Long-term Hemodialysis

  15. Dosing Schedules for UFH for Anticoagulation During Long-term Hemodialysis

  16. Dosing Schedules for UFH for Anticoagulation During Long-term Hemodialysis

  17. Monitor Anti-coagulations • No routinely measure anticoagulation parameters • Dialyzer clotting • Prolonged bleeding following dialysis • Monitoring with the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)

  18. Dialysis-specific factors: clotting • Low blood flow • High hematocrit • High ultrafiltration rate • Vascular access stenosis • Poor needle placement Anti-coagulant treatments

  19. STANDARD ANTICOAGULATION • Heparin: pharmacodynamicmodeling • Using an initial bolus followed by a constant fixed infusion of heparin to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) of 200 to 250 seconds • Normal = 90 to 140 seconds

  20. Improved dialyzer reuse after use of a population pharmacodynamicmodel to determine heparin doses • Dialyzer reuse rates increased significantly over time in the treatment group but remained unchanged in the control group (P<0.003) * Number of uses Use of a heparin model can improve dialyzer reuse rates Ouseph R, Brier ME, Ward RA Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;35(1):89.

  21. UFH Risks Benefits • Bleeding • Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia • Hypertriglyceridemia • Anaphylaxis • Hyperkalemia • Bone mineral disease • Decreased clotting of the dialysis circuit • Low cost • Widely available • Short half-life • Reversible with protamine

  22. Low molecular weight heparin

  23. Low molecular weight heparin • MW 4-5 kDa • 18 saccharide units • LMWH inactivate factor Xa • Lesser effect on thrombin (factor IIa)

  24. Low molecular weight heparin

  25. LMWH VS HEPARIN • More specific binding action >UFH • Easier to dose by weight • Single prefilled syringe injection • Increased half-life 2-4 hr • Prefer IV > SC • No agents for reverse its effects

  26. LMWH for Anticoagulation During Long-term Hemodialysis

  27. LMWH for Anticoagulation During Long-term Hemodialysis

  28. Monitor anticoagulations • No routinely measure anticoagulation parameters • Dialyzer clotting • Prolonged bleeding following dialysis • Monitoring with the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is not accurate • Measurement of anti-factor Xa levels keep 0.4-0.6 IU/mL or high risk bleeding 0.2-0.4 IU/mL

  29. Efficacy and safety

  30. Comparison of LMWH (enoxaparin) and standard heparin for HD anticoagulation • 36 chronic HD pts • Randomly assigned to enoxaparin (1 MKD) or standard heparin, followed for 12 wks  Single-dose protocol of enoxaparin is an effective and very convenient alternative to sodium heparin * *+ Frequency of clot formation (%) * * * * + + Grade Saltissi D, et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:2698-703.

  31. Meta-analysis: LMWH VS HEPARINBleeding: vascular access compression time LMWH and unfractionated heparin are similarly safe in preventing extracorporeal circuit thrombosis Lim W, et al. J Am SocNephrol 2004;15:3192-206.

  32. Meta-analysis: LMWH VS HEPARINExtracorporeal circuit thrombosis LMWH and unfractionated heparin are similarly effective in preventing extracorporeal circuit thrombosis Lim W, et al. J Am SocNephrol 2004;15:3192-206.

  33. Adverse effects

  34. Adverse effects: LMWH VS HEPARIN • Thrombocytopenia • Osteoporosis • Hyperkalemia • Hyperlipidemia

  35. HEPARIN-INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA IN HEMODIALYSIS • Frequency of HIT is suggested to be 8.1% of patients exposed to heparin • Significantly lower (1.8%) in patients exposed to LMWH Syed S, Nat Rev Nephrol 2009;5:501-11.

  36. HEPARIN-INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA • Type I HIT • Heparin binds, activates, and depletes platelets. • Typically occurs within the first 4 days of starting heparin therapy • Mild thrombocytopenia withaverage 100,000/mm3 • Resolves with time • Heparin therapy does not need to be stopped

  37. HEPARIN-INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA • Type II HIT • Usually occurs 5-12 day • Heparin binds to platelets, releasing platelet factor 4 (PF4) • More platelet aggregation • Paradoxical thrombus formation with limb-threatening ischemia

  38. HEPARIN-INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA • Extensive cross-reactivity (>90 percent) between the LMWH and standard heparin in terms of antibody recognition

  39. HEPARIN-INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA • No heparin hemodialysis • Regional citrate hemodialysis • Change to peritoneal dialysis • Other anti-coagulants

  40. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) • In a patient with HIT • All heparin must be stopped • Using direct thrombin inhibitors (argatroban) or Factor Xa inhibitors (danaparoid or fondaparinux) > other or no anticoagulation during RRT (1A) • In a patient with HIT who does not have severe liver failure • Using argatroban rather than other thrombin or Factor Xa inhibitors during RRT (2C) KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury 2012

  41. Adverse effects: LMWH VS HEPARIN • Thrombocytopenia • Osteoporosis • Hyperkalemia • Hyperlipidemia

  42. Effect of LMWH on bone metabolism in patients on maintenance hemodialysis • 40 patients on stable hemodialysis using unfractionated heparin (UFH) for more than 24 months • Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP) reflecting osteoclastic activity was elevated in 35% of patients. • Following LMWH treatment, TRACP was reduced by 13% (p<0.05) LMWH may partially alleviate osteoporosis associated with UFH administration in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Lai KN, et al. Int J Artif Organs 2001;24:447-55.

  43. Bone Mineral Disease • UFH is known to increase the risk of osteoporosis in pregnancy

  44. Adverse effects: LMWH VS HEPARIN • Thrombocytopenia • Osteoporosis • Hyperkalemia • Hyperlipidemia

  45. Heparin-induced hyperkalemia in chronic hemodialysis patients: comparison of LMWH and unfractionated heparin Comparison of unfractionated heparin (UH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) protocols Hottelart C, et al. Artif Organs. 1998;22(7):614-617.

  46. Heparin-induced hyperkalemia in chronic hemodialysis patients: comparison of LMWH and unfractionated heparin Comparison of unfractionated heparin (UH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) protocols Hottelart C, et al. Artif Organs. 1998;22(7):614-617.

  47. Hyperkalemia • Hypoaldosteronism with resultant hyperkalemia is a known side effect of UFH • Predialysispotassium levels decreased from 5.66 mEq/L to 5.15 mEq/L when patients were given LMWH instead of UFH Hottelart C, et al. Artif Organs. 1998;22(7):614-617.

  48. Adverse effects: LMWH VS HEPARIN • Thrombocytopenia • Osteoporosis • Hyperkalemia • Hyperlipidemia

  49. Reduced lipid concentrations during four years of dialysis with LMWH 500- 400- 300- 200- 100- 0- LMWH Triglycerides, mg/dL Heparin Heparin -20 -10 0 10 20 30 Time, months Triglyceride levels were decreased when patients switched to LMWH and rebounded when they reverted to UFH Deuber HJ, Schulz W. Kidney Int 1991;40:496-500.

  50. Reduced lipid concentrations during four years of dialysis with LMWH 350- 300- 250- 200- 150- 100- 50- 0- LMWH Heparin Heparin Cholesterol, mg/dL -20 -10 0 10 20 30 Time, months Cholesterol levels were decreased when patients switched to LMWH and rebounded when they reverted to UFH Deuber HJ, Schulz W. Kidney Int 1991;40:496-500.

More Related