1 / 33

Overview of Interim Guidelines for Subject Matter Eligibility Robert Weinhardt – Business Practice Specialist TC3600

Overview of Interim Guidelines for Subject Matter Eligibility Robert Weinhardt – Business Practice Specialist TC3600. Interim Guidelines. Purpose: To assist examiners in determining whether a claim is directed to statutory subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

oralee
Download Presentation

Overview of Interim Guidelines for Subject Matter Eligibility Robert Weinhardt – Business Practice Specialist TC3600

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of Interim Guidelines for Subject Matter EligibilityRobert Weinhardt – Business Practice Specialist TC3600

  2. Interim Guidelines • Purpose: To assist examiners in determining whether a claim is directed to statutory subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. • Published in the O.G. 11/22/2005 • Period for public commentary runs until June 30, 2006. • Submit comments via email addressed to: AB98.Comments@uspto.gov

  3. Interim Guidelines Intro • What’s In: • Statutory Categories • Judicial Exceptions • Practical Application • Preemption

  4. Interim Guidelines Intro • What’s Out: • “Not in the Technological Arts” • Freeman-Walter-Abele • Mental Steps or Human Steps • Machine Implemented • Data Transformation

  5. Prerequisites to AnalysisUnder 101 • Determine what applicant invented. • Review the spec and claims. • Identify and understand: • Any utility and/or practical application asserted by applicant; • The meaning of claim terms; and • Claim scope. • Conduct a thorough search. • What is known in the art can contribute to understanding the invention.

  6. Analysis Under 101 • Does the claimed invention fall within one of the four statutory categories? • Does the claimed invention fall within a judicial exception? • Does the claimed invention provide a practical application? • Does the claimed invention preempt a judicial exception?

  7. 1) Statutory Categories • What do we grant patents for? • 35 U.S.C. §101 reads: “Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefore, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title.”

  8. Statutory Categories • A “machine”, “manufacture”, and “composition of matter” all define things or products. • A “process” defines actions i.e. inventions that set forth a series of steps or acts to performed.

  9. Not in One of the Statutory Categories • Literary works per se. • Rules to play a game per se. • Legal agreements per se, e.g. an insurance policy. • Signals per se. • A computer program, logic or language per se.

  10. If Not, Don’t Stop • If the examiner can establish that a claim does not fall into a statutory category, that does not preclude complete examination for all other conditions of patentability. • The examiner must continue with the 101 analysis and must still examine the claims for compliance with 102, 103 and 112.

  11. 2) Judicial Exceptions • Despite the apparent sweep of 35 U.S.C. §101, the Supreme Court has specifically identified three categories of nonstatutory subject matter: • Laws of nature, per se • Natural phenomena, per se • Abstract ideas, per se

  12. Judicial Exception Examples • Laws of nature • e=mc2; f=ma • Natural phenomena • the heat of the sun; electricity; a new mineral • Abstract ideas • mathematical algorithms; legal rights

  13. If Yes, Don’t Stop • If a judicial exception is found in the claim, further analysis under 101 is required. • If a judicial exception is not found in the claim, the claim must fall within a statutory category and meet the other conditions of 101.

  14. 3) Practical Application • Two ways to provide a practical application of a judicial exception: • Physical Transformation, OR • Produce A Useful, Concrete, and Tangible Result

  15. Physical Transformation • The claimed invention transforms an article or physical object to a different state or thing. • If transformation is found, this ends the analysis for statutory subject matter. • Transformation of data is not “physical transformation,” nor are physical acts necessarily a “physical transformation.” • Example: manufacturing a tire by curing rubber.

  16. Physical Transformation • Even if a judicial exception is a limitation of the claimed invention, e.g. a law of nature, if it is applied in the physical transformation, a practical application is provided. • The claims still need to be checked for utility under 101 however.

  17. Useful, Concrete, Tangible • If no physical transformation appears in the claim, check for a “useful, concrete and tangible result”. • The focus is on the result, not the steps or structure used to produce the result. • A useful, concrete and tangible result must be either specifically recited in the claim or flow inherently therefrom.

  18. Useful, Concrete, Tangible • Even if a judicial exception is a limitation of the claimed invention, e.g. a law of nature, if it is applied to produce a useful, concrete and tangible result, a practical application is provided.

  19. “Useful” • The claimed invention as a whole must satisfy the utility requirement of 101: • specific, • substantial, and • credible utility. • These criteria require evaluation of the specification and the knowledge in the art.

  20. “Useful” • A complete disclosure should contain some indication of why the claimed invention is useful. • If the claimed invention does not fulfill any of the disclosed utilities, determine if the utility would have been recognized by those in the art.

  21. “Concrete” • Usually, a claimed invention is not concrete when a result cannot be assured or is not reproducible. • Concrete is not a requirement that the result must be 100% accurate (e.g., a claim directed to estimating, predicting or approximating something does not necessarily lack concreteness) • May require a determination of the level of ordinary skill in the art.

  22. Enablement • In instances where the invention cannot be used as intended without undue experimentation, an appropriate rejection of the claim as being nonstatutory under 35 U.S.C. 101 should be accompanied by a lack of enablement rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112 first paragraph.

  23. “Tangible” • “Real world” result. • Not necessarily tied to a machine; not a duplicate of “physical transformation”. • In other words, the opposite of “tangible” is “abstract”. • Thoughts are not “real world” results. • Example: Calculating a price of an item to sell and then conveying the calculated price to a potential customer

  24. Descriptive Material and Practical Application • Computer-related products such as software, data structures, and collections of data are also evaluated for a practical application. • Computer-related products are classified in one of two groups: • Functional Descriptive Material • Non-Functional Descriptive Material

  25. Functional Descriptive Material • “Functional descriptive material" includes data structures and computer programs which impart functionality when employed as a computer component. • The definition of "data structure" is "a physical or logical relationship among data elements, designed to support specific data manipulation functions." • See The New IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms 308 (5th ed. 1993).

  26. Functional Descriptive Material • Functional Descriptive material per se is not statutory. • Cf.In re Warmerdam, disembodied data structure claim. • Functional Descriptive material in combination with an appropriate computer readable medium must be capable of producing a useful, concrete and tangible result when used in a computer system. • Cf.In re Warmerdam – data structure stored in a computer memory, and In re Lowry, 32 USPQ2d 1031 (Fed. Cir. 1994) – data structure in a “computer readable medium”. • The “computer readable medium” must be physical structure, not a signal, which permits the functionality to be realized with the computer.

  27. Non-Functional Descriptive Material • Non-functional descriptive material per se is an abstract idea, and therefore is not statutory. • Non-Functional Descriptive Materialisnot statutory even if in combination with a physical medium. • No useful, concrete or tangible result is produced.

  28. Examples of Non-Functional Descriptive Material Even when non-functional descriptive material is stored to be read or outputted by a computer without any functional interrelationship, they do not impart functionality to the computer, i.e., they are not computer components. • Data base per se • Mere arrangements of facts or compilations of data • Share price on a disk • Music • Literature • Art • Photographs • Data formats, frames or packets

  29. Practical Application • A claim to a proper computer readable medium (not e.g. a signal) encoded with functional descriptive material that can function with a computer to effect a useful, concrete and tangible result (e.g. running an assembly line or executing a stock transaction) satisfies the practical application test.

  30. If Yes, Don’t Stop • Finding a practical application does not end the analysis under 101.

  31. 4) Preemption • A claim may not preempt abstract ideas, laws of nature or natural phenomena. • Further, a claim may not preempt every “substantial practical application” of an abstract idea, law of nature or natural phenomena because it would in practical effect be a patent on the judicial exceptions themselves.

  32. Preemption • Thus, even though a practical application is found in the claim, we must determine if every “substantial practical application” is being claimed. • If every substantial practical application is being claimed, the claim is non-statutory under 101.

  33. Thank You

More Related