A two level electricity demand model evaluation of the connecticut time of day pricing test
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 10

A TWO-LEVEL ELECTRICITY DEMAND MODEL. Evaluation of the Connecticut Time-of-Day Pricing Test. PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 49 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

A TWO-LEVEL ELECTRICITY DEMAND MODEL. Evaluation of the Connecticut Time-of-Day Pricing Test. By J.A Hausman , M. Kinnucan , D. McFadden Presented By Julius Kimutai Abstract.

Download Presentation

A TWO-LEVEL ELECTRICITY DEMAND MODEL. Evaluation of the Connecticut Time-of-Day Pricing Test.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


A two level electricity demand model evaluation of the connecticut time of day pricing test

A TWO-LEVEL ELECTRICITY DEMAND MODEL. Evaluation of the Connecticut Time-of-Day Pricing Test.

By J.A Hausman, M. Kinnucan, D. McFadden

Presented

By Julius Kimutai

Abstract.

A two-stage budgeting model is developed for electricity demand where consumption is treated as a different commodity. The model is applied to TOD price situations and also declining block price situations. Then the model is tested in a forecasting application to TOD customers.


Introduction

Introduction.

  • Time-of-day( TOD) electricity has received increased attention in the post-1974 era of sharply increased energy prices. Generating capacity for electricity can be divided into 3 main types : BASE LOAD CAPACITY, INTERMEDIATE CAPACITY and PEAK CAPACITY.

  • TOD prices offer a possible method of decreasing AVERAGE GENERATION COST per KWH of demand by causing peak demand to shift into other hours of the day when only base load capacity is required. Also can be set to approximate WELFARE OPTIMUM.

  • They analyze the results of Connecticut Peak Load Pricing Test. Where meters were installed in 199 households and readings of household electricity consumption were recorded every 15 minutes for a period of one-year.

  • The papers approach is that they treat electricity demand within a two stage budgetary context. Letting electricity demand in each period be a different commodity, they estimate relative household demands across periods conditional on relative prices, the appliance stock, socioeconomic xctics of the household and the weather.


Theoretical approache 2 two level budgeting model

THEORETICAL APPROACHE 2. Two-level budgeting model.


The model contd

The model contd.


A two level electricity demand model evaluation of the connecticut time of day pricing test

Two level budgeting procedure imposes separability between electricity consumption and the consumption of other commodities. The idea behind the approach is that the household decides the total to be spent on electricity along with how much to spend on other commodities.


The effects of appliance holdings socioeconomic factor and weather are incorporated

The effects of appliance holdings, socioeconomic factor, and weather are incorporated


Multivariate approach

MULTIVARIATE APPROACH


Estimation first level demand estimation

ESTIMATION.First level demand estimation


A two level electricity demand model evaluation of the connecticut time of day pricing test

Estimation contd.They use the first level demand to construct the price index which enters the second level daily consumption equations. They validate the model by performing forecasts using estimated coefficients . The peak level demand forecasts do fairly well in forecasting the relative load curve. The intermediate forecasts are less successful with three out of nine periods having relatively large forecast errors.


Model validation and conclusion

Model validation and conclusion

  • The model appears to perform relatively well in the forecast environment, especially in predicting peak period demands.

  • They conclude that it is worthwhile to consider using such a tool in the other TOD experiments where cross elasticities could also be estimated since the data design in the Connecticut test did not permit these elasticities to be estimated.


  • Login