Download
1 / 61

a L1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 300 Views
  • Updated On :

Mercantilism, Risk, and Portable Capital: Inventing the Newly Rich Week 11 Lecture 2 19 November 2004 OUTLINE: Mathematics and rationalization: The Quest for Efficiency “Re-investing” the world with Value Private Property and Consumption What is a thing worth? (M.S.R.P. = ???)

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'a L1' - omer


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Mercantilism risk and portable capital inventing the newly rich l.jpg

Mercantilism, Risk, and Portable Capital: Inventing the Newly Rich

Week 11 Lecture 2

19 November 2004


Slide3 l.jpg

OUTLINE: Newly Rich

Mathematics and rationalization: The Quest for Efficiency

“Re-investing” the world with Value

Private Property and Consumption

What is a thing worth? (M.S.R.P. = ???)


I mathematics and efficiency l.jpg
I. Mathematics and efficiency Newly Rich

A legacy of Mathematics: Economic rationality and efficiency


Slide5 l.jpg

“Newly Thinkable” values: Newly Rich

Body as machine; clockmaker cosmos; Labor = Property; Rationality; Efficiency; Calculation; invention of race as principle of identity /de-humanize

“Acceptable losses”

“Maximizing Profit”

CF: Galileo - math/numeracy as the new idiom/language


Slide7 l.jpg

Essential ideas for rise of Newly Richeconomic view of human being:

1) Human being as machine ---> division of labor

Cosmos as mechanical clock ---> immutable laws of competition, market, Invisible Hand --> The Divine Clockmaker


Absolutely key idea ii re investing the world with value l.jpg
ABSOLUTELY KEY IDEA: Newly RichII. Re-Investing the World With Value

Work is GOOD!

Calvin, Calvin, Calvin!!

NB: This is a total INVERSION of old values!!


Slide9 l.jpg

Old Values Newly Rich: Profit, risk, greed are

BAD!

Greed is a cardinal SIN!

“Work” is punishment for Adam’s Original Sin

Has power has power powerless


Slide10 l.jpg

  • GOOD WORK IS A SIGN OF ELECTION Newly Rich

    • Ill works are a sign of damnation

    • Fundamental shift from Luther: “The Xtn will do good works, but apparently good works can be carried out by a non-believer.”

    • Calvin: “Good works are testimonies of God dwelling in us.”

REVIEW: Calvin’s contribution

  • GOOD WORKS A REMEDY FOR ANXIETY!

    • I know I’m chosen if I do good works

    • Good works strengthen assurance in the believer that s/he is saved

    • No need for “FAITH ALONE”


Slide11 l.jpg

REVIEW: Newly Rich

  • The Lord fits each one of us to look for our VOCATION [“calling”]

    • a subjective and individual place in the world

  • God appoints duties to every person so that “he may not needlessly wander about in life.”

  • All actions are judged in God’s sight by one’s vocation.

Rembrandt: portraits = VOCATIONS



Slide13 l.jpg

P.S. electionNOW we can talk about “class”! It is defined as our relationship to

capital


Slide14 l.jpg

New Value: election Work is Good.

RISK is Good.

Success is a sign of our election.


Slide15 l.jpg


Iii private property l.jpg
III. Private Property election

Locke (again!?): Two Treatises on Government (1690)

26. Though the earth and all inferior creatures be common to all men, yet every man has a "property" in his own "person." This nobody has any right to but himself. The "labour" of his body and the "work" of his hands, we may say, are properly his. Whatsoever, then, he removes out of the state that Nature hath provided and left it in, he hath mixed his labour with it, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property. It being by him removed from the common state Nature placed it in, it hath by this labour something annexed to it that excludes the common right of other men. For this "labour" being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others.

31. But the chief matter of property being now not the fruits of the earth and the beasts that subsist on it, but the earth itself, as that which takes in and carries with it all the rest, I think it is plain that property in that too is acquired as the former. As much land as a man tills, plants, improves, cultivates, and can use the product of, so much is his property. He by his labour does, as it were, enclose it from the common. Nor will it invalidate his right to say everybody else has an equal title to it, and therefore he cannot appropriate, he cannot enclose, without the consent of all his fellow-commoners, all mankind. God, when He gave the world in common to all mankind, commanded man also to labour, and the penury of his condition required it of him. God and his reason commanded him to subdue the earth- i.e., improve it for the benefit of life and therein lay out something upon it that was his own, his labour. He that, in obedience to this command of God, subdued, tilled, and sowed any part of it, thereby annexed to it something that was his property, which another had no title to, nor could without injury take from him.

For Locke, the job of government is to PROTECT this property.


Slide17 l.jpg

ARGUMENT: How can you justify private property? election

1. State of Nature: God gives us everything in common

2. Yet: I have my own “person” --- cf. Descartes: I am sure of I

3. The “labor” of my “person” is mine

4. When I put labor into something, I take it out of the State of Nature

5. I can keep as much as I can use without spoiling


Slide18 l.jpg

WHAT DOESN’T SPOIL? election

Gold, silver, money have the value that is the “tacit agreement of men”; note how many times Locke uses the word CONSENT

NB: Nominalist turn: money/gold/silver have no value in themselves; rather, they have the value [name] agreed upon by “tacit consent”


Slide19 l.jpg

But how do we acquire “private property”? election

Meaning, you can loan money to non-Christians, but not to Christians.

But Jews can loan money to Christians.


Slide20 l.jpg

Anti-Semitism: election

Recall Cantor - blame Jews for the Plague

Project anxieties

(Cf: Douglas - purity; Spain 1492)


Slide21 l.jpg

Hitler, electionMein Kampf --- uses obviously medieval metaphors::

Jews as bankers and usurers


Slide22 l.jpg

Shylock provides the “bond” [guarantee] for the ships at sea --- but loans at interest [a pound of flesh]


Slide23 l.jpg

Medieval invention of “Purgatory” --- an escape-valve --- usurers don’t necessarily have to go to Hell forever… can pay off their mortal sins in Purgatory and others can mediate for them by indulgences and masses

Pope Pius in 1730s: Maybe Catholics can loan money, too.

How about at…4.5%…

NB: It was a sin; now it is ok.


Slide24 l.jpg

Review: MERCANTILISM --- usurers don’t necessarily have to go to Hell forever… can pay off their mortal sins in Purgatory and others can mediate for them by indulgences and masses

Creation of Trade Companies: Dutch East India Co.; British East India Co


Slide25 l.jpg

Mercantilism --- usurers don’t necessarily have to go to Hell forever… can pay off their mortal sins in Purgatory and others can mediate for them by indulgences and masses: American colonies export raw goods to England

England uses raw materials to manufacture finished products

Finished products exported/sold to American colonies

Consumer goods: from colonies:

Tobacco

Indigo

Coffee

Chocolate


Slide26 l.jpg

Mercantilism: --- usurers don’t necessarily have to go to Hell forever… can pay off their mortal sins in Purgatory and others can mediate for them by indulgences and massesthe “Columbian Exchange”

  • 1. Colonial possessions: markets for exports and suppliers of raw materials

    • Manufacturing forbidden in colonies

    • Commerce to be a monopoly of mother country


Slide27 l.jpg

Mercantilism --- usurers don’t necessarily have to go to Hell forever… can pay off their mortal sins in Purgatory and others can mediate for them by indulgences and masses[cont’d]

  • 2. Large population

    • Supply labor, market, and soldiers

    • In practice, it depended essentially on imported labor from Africa that could be forced to work like machines [avg. lasted 7 years in West Indies]


How much is something worth l.jpg
How Much is Something Worth? --- usurers don’t necessarily have to go to Hell forever… can pay off their mortal sins in Purgatory and others can mediate for them by indulgences and masses

Thomas Aquinas: Summa Theologica [1200s]

NB: What is a thing worth? Fixed essences = essentialism = eternal


Slide29 l.jpg

First, Aquinas sets up his opponents’ arguments: --- usurers don’t necessarily have to go to Hell forever… can pay off their mortal sins in Purgatory and others can mediate for them by indulgences and masses


Slide30 l.jpg

Then Aquinas answers his opponents and draws his own conclusion --- he appeals to the Gospel of Matthew in his deduction:

There is such a thing as a FIXED (just) price for an item

(what would a nominalist say???)


Slide31 l.jpg

REVIEW: conclusion --- he appeals to the Gospel of

Essentialism v. “NOMINALISM”

There is no essential connection between a thing and the name (representation / meaning) we give it

IN OTHER WORDS: names --- and meanings AND PRICES--- are ARBITRARY and CONTINGENT agreements

Shakespeare: “A rose by any other name would still smell sweet as a rose.”


Slide32 l.jpg

Locke has justified private property and as much of it as you can use so long as it doesn’t spoil. No intrinsic or essentialist “worth” --- rather, what is mutually consented to.


Slide33 l.jpg

So the cost of something is equal to the labor and material put into it.

But how do we compute the cost of labor?

If the human body is a machine…couldn’t one calculate the labor it performs in some mathematical fashion??


Slide34 l.jpg

Human labor as machine put into it.

Marx: have you turned a human being [labor] into just another commodity? [something to be exchanged with money]


Slide35 l.jpg

  • “Real [natural] price” = price in labor; exchange of labor

  • “Nominal [market] price” = price in capital [value consented to]

  • Note how this radically changes Thomas Aquinas: what is a thing “worth”??? What is a “just price”?

  • These “essentialist” questions don’t make sense in this system.


Adam smith the wealth of nations 1776 l.jpg
Adam Smith, self-interestThe Wealth of Nations (1776)


Slide37 l.jpg

  • NB: Adam Smith INVENTS the word “Mercantilism” in order to talk about what he is against. He is rather arguing for a laissez-faire capitalist Liberalism

    • [“laissez-faire” = “allow to do”]

  • Smith’s capitalist Liberalism: unregulated individual activity leads to greatest good for all; state should simply preserve order and avoid interference

  • Competition, not monopoly.

  • Note what he says on the function of Empire [to supply mother country with luxuries --- cocoa, coffee, tea, sugar]

  • Are American colonies worth the expense?


Slide38 l.jpg

Netherlands becomes 17th-c. Superpower; Dutch Calvinists as traders

Calvinism: worldly prosperity sign of divine favor: relation to Bible?


New values l.jpg

Turn to Atlantic Work is GOOD traders

RACE as a biological category

Europeans v. Non-Europeans

New Values:


Slide40 l.jpg

KEY: PORTS traders

Note shift from Mediterranean to Atlantic: not Venice / Italian Peninsula but UK, Netherlands, France, Spain, Portugal


Slide41 l.jpg

The DUTCH Calvinists: traders

Dutch Revolt: 1572-1648

Calvinists discontent with Charles V (Spain)

under the Holy Roman Empire

Achieve de facto independence in 1587

Spanish truce 1600-1615; re-engage as part of

Thirty Years War

Recognize Dutch Independence 1648

During revolt, extraordinary

economic development

Dutch East India Co. chartered

1605

1572: £9million in trade goods

1648: £32million

Great Tulip Crash of 1637


Slide44 l.jpg

Dutch tulip craze: “To a Dutchman of the Golden Age, the tulip was not a mundane and readily available flower. It was a brilliant newcomer, still bearing something of the allure of the exotic East and obtainable only in strictly limited quantities.”


Slide46 l.jpg

What is something tulip was not a mundane and readily available flower. It was a brilliant newcomer, still bearing something of the allure of theworth?

What is a just price?

Questions start to become meaningless…

Need new way of thinking them through


Slide47 l.jpg

New Gap classic T: $12.95 tulip was not a mundane and readily available flower. It was a brilliant newcomer, still bearing something of the allure of the

Made of: 100% cotton


Slide48 l.jpg

Banana Republic Basic Crew: $15.50 tulip was not a mundane and readily available flower. It was a brilliant newcomer, still bearing something of the allure of the

Made of: 100% cotton


Slide49 l.jpg

Abercrombie Logo T: $24.50 tulip was not a mundane and readily available flower. It was a brilliant newcomer, still bearing something of the allure of the

Made of: 100% cotton

(and a logo)


Slide50 l.jpg

Abercrombie No-T tulip was not a mundane and readily available flower. It was a brilliant newcomer, still bearing something of the allure of the

Maybe it’s not about the T?

Made of: 100% beefcake


Slide51 l.jpg

“Real” price = labor put into making this very valuable t-shirt

“Market” price = object’s value as a commodity [i.e., as interchangeable unit of exchange]. But what are they selling??!


Slide52 l.jpg

“Market” price = value as commodity t-shirt

[i.e., as interchangeable unit of exchange]


Slide53 l.jpg

Why do we buy stuff at prices that are highway robbery? t-shirt

A #1: Because we

Are all MARXISTS!

A #2: STATUS


Slide54 l.jpg

  • What stabilizes into order? SELF-INTEREST AND COMPETITION turn chaos into order like clockwork.

  • --- I look for lowest price. Prices adjust to what the “market” will bear. [supply / demand]

  • NB: Wealth of Nations a “Copernican revolution” in conception of human person/ morality

  • Medieval: greed/avarice deadly sins --- selfishness

  • Modern: self-interest the passions that make the clockwork universe run smoothly


Slide55 l.jpg

Classic work --- 1977 turn chaos into order like clockwork.

Thesis:

Traditional/Biblical: pursuit of material interests condemned as one of seven deadly sins: AVARICE [greed] --- I.e., unethical and immoral

17th-18th cc. transformation: pursuit of material interests eventually --- hidden reasons of God --- work ethically and morally to contain unuruly / destructive human desires.


Slide56 l.jpg

Georg Friedrich Handel, turn chaos into order like clockwork.“All We Like Sheep Have Gone Astray”

“All we like sheep have gone astray, everyone to his own way…We have turned, we have turned, Everyone to his own way…”


Slide57 l.jpg

London coffeehouse, 1705 turn chaos into order like clockwork.


Slide58 l.jpg

Coffee: symbol of turn chaos into order like clockwork.

mercantilist world of empire and luxury items [sugar, tobacco]


Slide59 l.jpg

SUMMARY POINTS: turn chaos into order like clockwork.

1. A benevolent Deity: Newton, Locke, Smith

2. Laws of Nature --- clockwork laws implanted in nature/us for the best.

3. Appearances deceive: fixed price vs. market price

Self-interest appears to be selfish and lead to anarchy

In reality (for Smith): greatest good for individual leads to the greatest good of all [“Invisible Hand”]

4. Subjective individualism: my good and my desires center

5. “Copernican revolution” in human sentiment:

Old: self-interest/competition/greed are AVARICE

New: they are the positive values bringing order out of chaos


Slide60 l.jpg

Baroque world: a universe run by an omniscient Provident God …. who, like a giant Clockmaker, has made “the very best of all possible worlds”

In the coffee houses and salons, a new intellectual world of “Enlightenment” will emerge --- talk about religious tolerance, social contracts and the virtues of liberty and human freedom . . . conversations ironically made possible by an institution of absolutism we have already seen . . .


ad