1 / 14

SO4029 Sociology of the City

Power, Politics

olympia
Download Presentation

SO4029 Sociology of the City

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. SO4029 Sociology of the City Urban Governance & Politics

    2. Power, Politics & Policy Power & Resources Functions of Local State/Govt.: Welfare Provision Regulator of Local Economy An intermediary in the formation of collective identity A coercive agent of social order and discipline (Savage et al p.154) Also - Infrastructure, planning, sanitation, local environment etc.

    3. The Structure of Urban Politics Politicians Professionals & Bureaucrats The ‘Parapolitical Structure’: Pressure groups Business organisations Labour & trade union organisations Conservation societies and other special interest groups (Nimby) Homeowner groups and tenants associations Urban Social Movements

    4. Theories of Urban Governance Elite Theories – see Machiavalli (16th C.), Pareto, Mosca, political intrigue and cunning, democracy largely illusory; Michels, ‘Iron Law of Oligarchy’ – rule by confederation of those at top of political/organisational tree ‘Public Choice’ – Dahl – ‘no one group can monopolise power; Arrow(1951); Almond (1990) – local politics needs to be responsive to voters exercising rational choice (see Parker P.120-121) See Parker p.120See Parker p.120

    5. Urban Political Economy – (see Castells; Harvey) – neo-Marxist/left liberal perspective – urban political system as a consequence of capitalist/market competition and influence Urban ‘Growth Machine’ – Logan & Molotch – ‘boosterism’ and ‘growth coalitions’ – collective economic elite? Urban Regime Theory – Elkin & Stone – ‘informal yet relatively stable groups with access to institutional resources’ – informal collection of economic elites – urban ‘movers’ and ‘shakers’ Consensus- whether cities are controlled by elite is a matter of debate. However, elites tend to dominate the decision making process in most cities. (see Gottdiener, Savage, Parker) Theories of Urban Governance ‘Glocal’ Governance - ‘Glocal’ Governance - Mention ‘glocal governance’‘Glocal’ Governance - ‘Glocal’ Governance - Mention ‘glocal governance’

    6. The Changing Nature of Urban Governance 1) Until mid 19th Century – Oligarchy of local bourgeoisie 2) 1850-1910 - Municipal Socialism – public service, paternalism, liberal reform (& corruption) 3) 1910 – 1940 – The depression leads to greater role of local government – housing, health, education, welfare. (Business leaders supplanted by civic minded lower middle classes)

    7. The Changing Nature of Urban Governance 4) 1940 -1975 – ‘Urban Managerialism’ (Rex & Moore (1967) – Professionals and Politicians (facilitating the needs of capitalist enterprise while mitigating its negative effects) 5) mid 1970’s – Decline of local government – centralised control and privatization/quasi-marketisation of local services – ‘civic entrepreneurialism’ 6) New Phase of Local Government? – Increasing Public Concerns over Environment & Sustainability (Knox & Pinch, 2000; Savage et al, 2003)

    8. Urban ‘Democracy’ Politics in the Industrial City: Parish, Borough & County to Elected Council 1889 (England & Wales) USA ‘Bossism & Political Machines’ ‘Gerrymandering’

    9. Late 19th & Early 20th C. Workforce Needs of Capital/Industry – ‘Devalorisation’ Individual Provision (Market Failures) Bridging the Gap: Public Health (Public ‘Good’) Education Housing Welfare Transport Legitimation of Local Government Urban Governance & ‘Collective Consumption’ (Castells) Night sewer men 19th c see ByrneNight sewer men 19th c see Byrne

    10. The Challenge to Collective Consumption ‘Fiscal Crisis’ of 1970’s – Public wants and tax base out of sync. Erosion of the Tax Base Reproductive self sufficiency v reproductive dependency (‘overload’ & ‘dependency’)- (see Saunders, 1986) Thatcherism – Removal of local tax raising powers and spending. Local authorities (labour) seen to be representatives of the ‘feckless’ urban poor spending the taxes of the ‘hard-working’ middle classes. (Similar patter of ‘Privatism’ in USA under Reagan) Transfer of public services to private firms and ‘quangos’ Reduction of Executant role of Local Government (Savage et al, 2003).

    11. Political Participation in Local Elections Declining electoral turnout generally, and particularly in local elections < 50% more commonly 25-30%

    12. Political Participation Key Reasons for voter apathy– Don’t need to act No point in acting Socio-spatial (Gottdiener): Suburbanisation (see also secessionist movements & ‘divorce the city’) Centralisation Privatism Globalization – (Effectiveness and Locus of Decision-making)

    13. Filling the Gap: Urban Social Movements Alternative cultures Urban street as a locus of conflict Migration, diversity and public protest Castells (1978) – mobilisation for rights to collective consumption Pickvance (1985) – linked sub-model of urban movements 1) Provision and Access to Housing & Urban Services 2) Control and Management of the Urban Environment 3) Defensive Movements around Environmental or Social Threats Urban (& Suburban) Social Movements & Issue Politics

    14. Metropolitan Social Policy: The Ongoing Debate (Liberals) Social Intervention: ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’ – collective self interested action is often against wider social interests Uneven Development & Policy: Redistribution Infrastructure and Housing (Conservatives) Market Intervention: Support for Economic Development Support for Global Competition (Gottdiener & Hutchison, 2006) (New Boosterism?)

    15. Social Justice (Harvey, 1973) Development of non-exploitative forms of social, economic, occupational and political organisation Combat social and economic marginalisation Empower the disenfranchised Enable widespread consultation on urban projects and their design Enact social control in a non-oppressive manner that does not unnecessarily inhibit empowerment and self-expression Recognise and mitigate the negative ecological effects of urban developments, including their impact on future generations

More Related