1 / 17

Subtropical Low Cloud Feedback in a Superparameterized GCM - A Mechanism and a CRM Column Analogue

This study investigates the subtrropical low cloud feedback in a superparameterized GCM by comparing simulations with control SSTs versus SST+2K. The results show that the cloud response is physically understandable and sensitive to grid resolution, with an increase in low clouds in the subtrpical regions and summer high latitude.

Download Presentation

Subtropical Low Cloud Feedback in a Superparameterized GCM - A Mechanism and a CRM Column Analogue

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Subtropical low cloud feedback in a superparameterized GCM - a mechanism and a CRM column analogue Peter N. Blossey Matthew C. Wyant Christopher S. Bretherton Department of Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington (thanks also to Marat Khairoutdinov and CMMAP)

  2. Clouds in a superparameterized GCM • Superparameterization - a climate model with a small cloud-resolving model (CRM) running in place of the normal physical parameterizations in every grid column. • Computationally expensive, but may simulate turbulent clouds (especially deep convection) more realistically. • SP-CAM (Khairoutdinov and Randall 2005) uses 2D CRMs with 32x30 gridpoints,x = 4 km - under-resolves boundary-layer Cu, Sc. • Wyant et al. (2006) examined SPCAM cloud response to an idealized climate warming by comparing 3.5-year simulations with control SSTs vs. SST+2K. • Is the cloud response: • physically understandable? • sensitive to grid resolution?

  3. SPCAM has reasonable net CRF and low clouds • Patterns good; not enough offshore stratocumulus; ‘bright’ trades/ITCZ. • LTS = 700 - 1000 • correlated to net CRF over subtropical oceans. • - Natural separator between subtropical cloud regimes. Use LTS for Bony-type cloud regime sorting’ to analyze subtropical (30S-30N) oceanic low cloud response

  4. +2K cloud/CRF changes • SWCF trends dominate net Þ low cloud response. • Low cloud increases in subtropics, summer high-latitude. • LTS increases over all ocean regions.

  5. Typical vertical structure in trades (SE Pac) • Cloud fraction and inversion strength increase together. • Net CRF (not shown) proportional to cloud fraction. Inversion strengthens and LTS increases Subsidence changes are location-dependent.

  6. LTS-sorted low-latitude ocean cloud response warm SST cold SST high LTS subsidence low LTS high LTS subsidence low LTS • 10-20% relative increase in low cld fraction/condensate across all high-LTS (cool-SST, subsiding) regimes.

  7. Other LTS-ordered fields high SST low SST low SST high SST diverse changes 1-2% moister PBL more PBL rad cool low LTS high LTS low LTS high LTS

  8. Conceptual model of SP-CAM trade ‘Cu’ feedbacks Radiative Mechanism Higher SST More absolute humidity More radiative cooling More convection More clouds Possible issues: • SP-CAM under-resolution • Sensitive to GHG & warming scenario since radiatively-driven.

  9. Column Analogue for SP-CAM low-cld feedbacks • Calculate MMF composite for LTS decile (e.g. 80-90%). • Use composite , horizontal advective T/q tendencies and SST. Nudge to composite winds. A realistic wind direction profile is also needed (RICO). • Allow mean subsidence to adjust to local diabatic cooling to keep SCM T profile close to SP-CAM sounding. (More on next slide.) • Nudge moisture above surface layer to counteract effects of sporadic deep convection and detraining high cloud in SP-CAM composite forcings. • Run to a statistically-steady state. Key assumption 1: (like Zhang&Breth 2008, Caldwell&Breth 2008) - Regime-mean +2K cloud response can be recovered from regime-mean profile/advective tendency changes.

  10. Key assumption 2:Vertical Velocity Feedbacks • In low latitudes, the free-tropospheric temperature profile is remotely forced by deep convection over the warm parts of the tropics. • Weak temperature gradient approximation (WTG): Stratified adjustment (compensating vertical motions) prevents build-up of local temperature anomalies. • Our new WTG formulation for column modeling builds on Caldwell & Bretherton (2008); related to approaches used by Mapes (2004), Raymond & Zeng (2005),Kuang (2008). • Compared to existing approaches, it has the advantage of a clear derivation from a relevant physical model applicable to quasi-steady dynamics.

  11. Vertical Velocity Feedbacks (Derivation) • Assume small perturbation to a reference state. • The linear, damped, hydrostatic, quasi-steady momentum and mass conservation equations in pressure coordinates give: • These equations can be combined to relate * to Tv*: • Assuming sinusoidal pertubations in x of wavenumber k: A horizontal length scale , where k=(2), and momentum-damping rate am are needed. We choose =650km and am=1/(2 days) w/ am vertically uniform.

  12. LTS80-90 forcings and profiles ,q profiles; SST Hor. advection ctrl +2K + q nudging winds averaging period

  13. Results • CRM has deeper moist layer, but similar +2K cloud response. • Mean and +2K cld response depend a bit on setup details, wind shear. CRM SP-CAM

  14. Cu-layer radiative forcing/nudging SP-CAM • Radiative heating change in the same sense in CRM as in SP-CAM, though not as strong. • Vertical velocity feedback  is small compared to SP-CAM 0, has little change in +2K run. • Q nudging small compared to vadv. Q nudge CRM CRM Vertical Advection

  15. LES resolution (x=100 m, z=40 m, Nx=512) • Large reduction in mean low cloud and SW cloud forcing. • +2K low cloud change similar in magnitude but different in structure. LES CRM

  16. Interpretation 4 km makes Cu clouds too weak and broad • Excessive Cu needed to flux water up to inversion. LES CRM

  17. Conclusions • Subtropical boundary-layer cloud increases dramatically in SP-CAM simulations with 2 K warmer SST. • Tropospheric warming increases the clear-sky radiative cooling of the moist Cu layer, driving more Cu cloud. • A column CRM analogue suggests that SP-CAM mean cloud are greatly overestimated due to coarse CRM resolution. The structure of the +2K cloud changes depends on resolution. • LES column analogues show promise for studying greenhouse+aerosol effects on boundary-layer clouds; further research needed into the optimal formulation of large-scale dynamical feedbacks on the column. • See poster later today for a static version of this talk.

More Related