1 / 14

Active galaxies, thermal conduction and gas in galaxy groups and clusters

Active galaxies, thermal conduction and gas in galaxy groups and clusters. Suparna Roychowdhury. Collaborators: Mitchell Begelman, JILA Mateusz Ruszkowski,JILA Biman Nath, RRI. Astronomy Group , Raman Research Institute Bangalore, India.

nuru
Download Presentation

Active galaxies, thermal conduction and gas in galaxy groups and clusters

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Active galaxies, thermal conduction and gas in galaxy groups and clusters Suparna Roychowdhury Collaborators: Mitchell Begelman, JILA Mateusz Ruszkowski,JILA Biman Nath, RRI Astronomy Group, Raman Research Institute Bangalore, India Groups of galaxies in nearby universe, Santiago, Chile, 5 - 9 december, 2005

  2. Groups and clusters of galaxies • Most galaxies found in groups (<50 members) or clusters (100-1000) • Mass range between 1013 -- 1015 M • Size varies between 1--few Mpc • Contains large amount of hot gas (intracluster gas)--~10% of the total mass • Temperature between 1--10 keV Coma cluster NGC 2300(central part)

  3. Properties of ICM • ICM self-gravity negligible • Adiabatic gas infall into dark matter clumps(no dissipation) similar scaling laws as dark matter • S = T/ne2/3 • ICM temp. determined by dark matter potential well • Thermal speed of protons~ velocity dispersion of galaxies

  4. Expected Scaling relations • Lx n2T1/2R3  T2 (since T  M/R) • S  T (since objects forming at the same epoch have same mean density) Voit & Bryan(2001) • S  T0.65--> density in groups is lower than expected • Steeper relation observed : Lx  T2.8 • Observations Show Deviations From Scaling Relations!!

  5. Preheating by supernovae or AGNs? SR & BBN (2003) • fresh look at ICM (with universal temp. profile(Lokenet.al (2002)) in hydrostatic equilibrium • find excess entropy requirement Need ~ 0.5 - 1keV per particle Bialek et.al (2001)

  6. AGNs in clusters • A large fraction of the mechanical energy of jets is deposited in the ambient medium • Buoyant bubbles of relativistic plasma can also deposit energy • Cosmic rays from AGNs can also preheat • the gas in groups – possibly connected to Li-6 • abundance (Nath, Madau & Silk 2005) • Radio galaxies preferentially reside in poor clusters (Bahcall & Chokshi 1992; Best 2004)

  7. Buoyant bubbles and effervescent heating (Dalla Vecchia et al 2004) • Buoyant bubbles of relativistic plasma can rise and deposit energy by doing pdV work • For a large flux of bubbles, the `effervescent’ heating rate can be related to AGN luminosity (Begelman 2001) • Believed to be effective in quenching cooling flows---can they also explain the excess entropy at large radii? A2597 (McNamara et al 2001)

  8. Energy requirements • Time evolution of ICM with effervescent heating, cooling and thermal conduction--compare entropy with observations after Hubble time • Required energy input EAGN Mcl1.5 Deduced relation: MBH  Mcl5/3 (extension of MBH– Mhalorelation?) (Ferrarese & Merritt 2000)

  9. Roychowdhury et. al, 2005, ApJ • gas density decreases with time when heating • is on and decreases after heating has been • switched off. • effects of heating and thermal conduction • are seen even at large radii (beyond 0.5 rvir)!

  10. (Ponman et al 2002) • No obvious entropy cores in poor clusters • In conflict with expectations from earlier preheating models • First heating model with AGNs, radiative cooling and thermal conduction which does not produce isentropic cores – gentle positive gradient in the entropy profiles Roychowdhury et. al (2005)

  11. Support for radio loud AGN heating (Croston et al 2005) • Gas in groups with radio loud AGNs is at a higher entropy (than gas in groups with radio quiet AGNs)

  12. Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect and cluster gas • CMB photons are inverse Compton scattered by hot electrons decreasing the CMB flux in the RJ region in the direction of the cluster • Enhanced entropy decreases the amount of distortion !!

  13. SZ angular power spectrum • Effervescent heating decreases the power spectrum more than previously thought

  14. Summary • Feedback from AGNs may explain the excess entropy in galaxy groups and clusters • Effervescent heating is a viable model. • Predict MAGN Mcl 5/3. • Recent observations reveal the connection between excess entropy and the presence of radio loud AGNs in groups. • Decrease in SZ power spectrum larger than previously thought.

More Related