1 / 34

BEST INTERESTS OR LEGAL RECTITUDE: Australian MHT stakeholder and case-flow implications

This article examines the limitations of relying solely on best interests or therapeutic jurisprudence as a basis for Mental Health Tribunal (MHT) practice in Australia. It argues for a nuanced approach that considers the domains of law, medicine, and social factors to achieve fairness and optimal treatment outcomes. The implications for MHT stakeholders and case-flow management are explored.

norris
Download Presentation

BEST INTERESTS OR LEGAL RECTITUDE: Australian MHT stakeholder and case-flow implications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    More Related