1 / 38

Gaming as a Course of Study

Legitimizing video games within the academy Jim Whitehead Associate Professor, Computer Science Univ. of California, Santa Cruz ejw@cs.ucsc.edu. Gaming as a Course of Study. Some media form academic disciplines. Fiction English Literature Newspapers & magazines

Download Presentation

Gaming as a Course of Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Legitimizing video games within the academy Jim Whitehead Associate Professor, Computer Science Univ. of California, Santa Cruzejw@cs.ucsc.edu Gaming as a Course of Study

  2. Some media form academic disciplines • Fiction • English Literature • Newspapers & magazines • Journalism, Communications • Movies • Film Studies, Cinematic Arts • Television • Television Studies, Cinema-Television • Hypertext/Web • Web Engineering, Web Conference, ACM Hypertext By hans_s, Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/archeon/17009869/

  3. Other media do not • Telegraph, Telex, Fax • Telephone, cell phones • Citizen’s Band radio • Instant messaging • Email • Board games • These have all been the focus of substantial academic study… • … but have not led to the formation of focused academicdisciplines • Why? By get directly down, Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/65172294@N00/147205810//

  4. Understanding ourselves • Media that create academic disciplines: • Are mass media • Tell stories (fiction and nonfiction) that allow us to reflect on the human condition • Help us understand ourselves • Are deeply embedded in culture • Are modes of cultural production • Video games share these traits Persuasive Games, 2008 http://www.persuasivegames.com/games/game.aspx?game=fatworld//

  5. Forming a discipline • Video games share qualities of other successful media focused disciplines • As a highly interactive media, allows direct engagement with people • Tremendous potential for powerful, transformative experiences • By comparison, other media are more passive • How is a legitimate new discipline formed? • What gives it staying power?

  6. What is legitimacy? • Legitimacy is the state of being legitimate • Legitimate (Merriam-Webster Online) • In accordance with law, lawful • Word derives from Latin legitimus, from leg- (law) • Conforming to recognized principles or accepted rules and standards • That is, meeting social norms of a community • Born in wedlock

  7. Who confers legitimacy? • Legitimacy of an academic discipline is a distributed decision making process • Academic disciplines • Creation of journals, conferences • Institutions • Creation of positions, curricula, departments • Accreditation of programs

  8. New disciplines emerge from existing ones Cinema Arts Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH) Communication/New Media Studies Video Games (theory & praxis) Artificial Intelligence(AAAI) Digital Media Human Computer Interaction (SIGCHI)

  9. New disciplines emerge from existing institutions Video Games Universities(Schools & Departments) Industry Professional Societies Funding Agencies

  10. Problems of interdisciplinarity • Video games are highly interdisciplinary • Bridge arts and engineering • Multiple tensions • Inside universities • Hiring & tenure • Creating academic programs in existing departments (or cross-departmental programs) • Inside professional societies • Publishing in existing conferences & journals • Inside funding agencies • No targeted programs

  11. Benefits of Legitimacy • Resolves problems of interdisciplinarity • Specialized departments • Faculty hired & promoted in discipline-specific department • Academic programs offered in tailored department • Specialized disciplinary home • Focused conferences & journals • Dedicated funding opportunities • Funding decisions focus on merit within discipline • Reduces need to justify focus of inquiry

  12. Achieving Legitimacy by meeting needs of Industry

  13. Vocational Training • Engineering education has always been pragmatic • Traditionally more vocational than liberal majors • Students keenly interested in good job opportunities post graduation • Hence, training students for industrial jobs has appeal • Games industry is large, and growing • Good high-paying jobs

  14. Potential for mismatch • Industry has short term focus • Academia has timespans of decades+ • Reward structures differ • Universities reward novelty • Industry rewards risk aversion, innovation within a genre • Lack of understanding of how research can lead to dramatically different game experiences

  15. Industry: Recommendations • Use vocational training as one source of legitimacy • Do not make it the sole source • Universities should engage in long-term research and teaching agendas that may not always mesh with short-term industrial needs • The fortunes of industries change over decadal time spans • Consider the pinball game industry… • Need broader base of legitimacy

  16. Achieving Legitimacy via sources inside Colleges and Universities

  17. Legitimacy inside colleges & universities • The goals of a research university are to • Create new knowledge • Research • Educate students • Courses & degree programs • Perform service to society • To achieve legitimacy, must substantively address first two goals • In a teaching focused university, is often sufficient to address teaching

  18. Universities: Teaching Video Games • Broad success • Multiple degree programs in North America & Europe • Technically focused, interdisciplinary, art focused • Many courses on game making & game studies • Student interest is strong • Degree programs & courses generate strong enrollments UCSC: 100 students in first year of major (Fall 2007), 320 students in intro game design class (Winter 2008) • Enrollments generate resources • Need for specialized faculty

  19. Universities:Research in Video Games • Mixed • Some degree programs lack associated research mission • Courses taught by lecturers with no expectation of creating a research program • Few dedicated research groups worldwide • Small number of multi-person groups • Otherwise, mostly 1 or 2 individual faculty per institution

  20. Universities: Danger of Decoupling Teaching & Research • At research universities, long term survival depends on strong research • Without research, a few bad years of enrollment can lead to a program being canceled • Lack of research mission makes all other aspects of legitimation much harder

  21. Consider Home Economics at Cornell • 1899 conference at Lake Placid • Led to courses (1903-04) • Dept. of Home Economics (1907) • Inside School of Agriculture • College of Home Economics (1925) • But no Dean until 1941! • Marriage course wildly popular • Source of anxiety among more conservative faculty • Post WW-II, as an applied science, at a disadvantage compared to basic sciences for research funding • Applied sciences less prestigious within academy • 1969: Changes name to Human Ecology • Also helps form Women’s Studies program Martha van Rensselaer and Flora Rose, First co-directors of College of Home Economics 1920’s rmc.library.cornell.edu/homeEc/cases/intro.html

  22. Pitfalls of Home Economics • Strong focus on vocational training • Not perceived to be as rigorous as other degrees • Knowledge created is very applied • Very practical, but with limited theoretical contribution to other sciences • Strongly gendered • Initially viewed as a way to attract women to universities • Later viewed as reinforcing gender stereotypes women were working to overcome in the 1960’s & 1970’s

  23. Universities: Recommendations • When creating degree programs in research universities • Staff mostly with tenure-track research faculty • Emphasize synergy between research and teaching • Emphasize humanistic aspect of creating computer games – not just vocational training for games jobs • Stress computer games research • Work hard to make programs welcoming to women • Recognize that formation of a new department is a likely outcome over 5-15 year timespan

  24. Approaches for Legitimizing Computer Games Degree Proposals • Internal sources • Support from senior faculty • Gravitas effect • Support from administration • Support from other departments • Engage library • External sources • Emphasize research potential in games • Funding opportunities • Successful programs at other institutions • Power of precedent • Accreditation • Relevance to industry

  25. Achieving Legitimacy via Professional Societies

  26. Attributes of mature disciplines • Conferences • Computer Science tends to follow conference per community model • Major conference under academic control • Mature, transparent peer review process • Multiple satellite conferences & workshops • Journals • At least one journal where best work appears • Top academics in field are editors • Reification inside professional society • SIG within ACM, TC inside IEEE

  27. Video games conferences: where do we stand? • Conferences • GDC • DIGRA • ACM Sandbox • AIIDE • IEEE Computational Intelligence and Games • Future Play • CyberGames • Serious Games Summits • Microsoft Academic Days Computer Games in Education • No first-tier conference covering game studies research and game engineering research (AI, graphics, networking, software eng., etc.)

  28. Video game journals: where do we stand? • No ACM or IEEE Transactions level journal focused on video games • ACM Computers in Entertainment • A magazine (not journal), limited engagement from community • Journal of Game Development • Well organized, needs more submissions • Game Studies • First tier, needs administrative support

  29. Reification inside professional societies: where do we stand? • No ACM Special Interest Group • IEEE has Games Technical Committee • Part of Computational Intelligence Society • Not broadly engaged by games research community • Education SIG inside IGDA • Broad participation of community • IGDA lacks scholarly apparatus • DIGRA • Game studies focus • Not widely known inside Computer Science • Conference, not journal

  30. Professional Societies: Recommendations • Games community needs to decide upon single conference to be the primary research venue • Bringing designers and techies under same umbrella will be tough (ACM Hypertext as model) • Create Transactions level journal in IEEE or ACM for technical work • Move Game Studies to a commercial publisher (but retain openness) • Create an ACM SIG, or broadly engage IEEE Games Technical Committee • OR, develop scholarly apparatus within IGDA

  31. Achieving Legitimacy via Funding Agencies

  32. Attributes of mature disciplines • Successful creation of multiple programs for research funding • Multiple government agencies provide research funding • Broad acceptance of merits of long-term research agenda of discipline

  33. Research Funding: Where do we stand? • Serious Games • Broad resonance within funding agencies • Multiple substantial research efforts in this space • Often an applied science • Kudos to Ben Sawyer and Mike Zyda • No US funding programs dedicated to basic computer games research • Need to seek funding within other disciplines

  34. Research Funding: Recommendations • Start process of creating a basic computer games research program inside one or more funding agencies • US centric ideas: • Computing Research Association • Computing Community Consortium program • NSF workshops

  35. What we must do • Articulate a broad research agenda in computer games • Justification for conferences, journal • Permits reification inside professional societies • Used to justify research funding programs • Justifies depth of research area when hiring new research faculty • Helps justify new degree programs, especially at MS and PhD level

  36. What might a research agenda look like? • Deep procedurality inside games • Adaptive storytelling • Automatic level generation, Procedural art creation • Games that teach • Serious games, K-12, college subjects • Harnessing game reward systems outside games • Understanding the activity of design • Understanding the human/game system • Emotive elements of games, characters • Social dynamics of virtual worlds • Real-time computer graphics • Especially non-photorealistic graphics

  37. Summary • Creation of degree programs is only a first step • Need to create video games discipline • Process of doing so will lead to legitimacy • As we bring in new students, faculty, important to create disciplinary apparatus • Key: developing broad research agenda in video games

More Related